SA Footy

Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?

therisingblues wrote:Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?

more like winning is the only reason he is there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dols wrote:

therisingblues wrote:Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?

more like winning is the only reason he is there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Just quoting this post so we can reflect back on this when the Chad is quoted in the press to the contrary.....

Dols wrote:

therisingblues wrote:Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?

more like winning is the only reason he is there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So when he gets told from above to take a player off in the last quarter because he has played x ammount of minutes thats fine?
Will Chad play his players in the positions he wants and not what position he is told they must play?
At the end of the day he is just a puppet for the AFL side

Jim05 wrote:

Dols wrote:

therisingblues wrote:Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?

more like winning is the only reason he is there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So when he gets told from above to take a player off in the last quarter because he has played x ammount of minutes thats fine?
Will Chad play his players in the positions he wants and not what position he is told they must play?
At the end of the day he is just a puppet for the AFL side

sounds like you are talking about your domestic relationship. Nice story[emoji106]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Jim05 wrote:

Dols wrote:

therisingblues wrote:Dols.
I couldn't be bothered watching the whole video, but after viewing the first minute I'm assuming that Chad is going to say words to the affect that the Magpies will try and win or whatever, and you think this is irrefutable proof that the Magpies are all about winning flags and not just player development?
Is this correct?

more like winning is the only reason he is there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So when he gets told from above to take a player off in the last quarter because he has played x ammount of minutes thats fine?
Will Chad play his players in the positions he wants and not what position he is told they must play?
At the end of the day he is just a puppet for the AFL side

You're both right. Winning A grade games is the ultimate imperative.

Rising Power wrote:You're both right. Winning A grade games is the ultimate imperative.

Of course it is and so it should be.
Cornes may say he is there to win but when push comes to shove looking after the A grades fitness and form comes before a B grade win

Jim05 wrote:

Rising Power wrote:You're both right. Winning A grade games is the ultimate imperative.

Of course it is and so it should be.
Cornes may say he is there to win but when push comes to shove looking after the A grades fitness and form comes before a B grade win

Exactly. But I still expect a win.

I'm not fazed by Cornes coaching Port , not sure he is what they need to develop players though as he said he would be a tough coach. Words were good but delivery wasn't congruent. I'm more waiting for what will happen if Power have another poor year. Crowds will drop so what then ? No SANFL bailouts and no new Oval . Interesting next few years for the Power.

Dols wrote:

twosheds wrote:Au contraire, the primary focus of the power reserves is to develop players for the league side - not win games of football. Whilst I'm sure the players give their all and try to win; this is not the number 1 directive that will be given to Chad.

are you calling chad a lier?



What's a "lier" ?

a lier is a typo, your dad not pulling out is a big mistake


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

Call an ambulance , my sides are splitting from your attempted riposte. Seriously if you believe that he will call the shots there's a bridge in Sydney you might want to look at purchasing.

In the cold hard light of day, I reckon Dols will think he made a dick of himself with the pathetic shit he posted last night.

Spargo wrote:In the cold hard light of day, I reckon Dols will think he made a dick of himself with the pathetic shit he posted last night.

yesterday afternoon??? No posts last night tard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dols wrote:

Spargo wrote:In the cold hard light of day, I reckon Dols will think he made a dick of himself with the pathetic shit he posted last night.

yesterday afternoon??? No posts last night tard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You had a go at Jim05 at 7:54pm, that's night in most people's books (if you had half a brain you'd realise it states what time you post at the top each time) - have another drink, legend.

Hardly night and no drinks last night tard. Want to make it personal, I will.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dols wrote:Hardly night and no drinks last night tard. Want to make it personal, I will.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1- 7:54pm is night, no refuting.
2- YOU made it personal when you started the name calling with tard.
Maybe you SHOULD have a drink, legend.

Kids, please refrain from the personal comments. They're only for me and fellow Admin and Mods

Spargo wrote:1- 7:54pm is night, no refuting.

Yep, considering that at 7:54pm and at this time of year the sun has well and truly gone from the sky.

In fact, 7:30pm is the official commencement of 'night', based on when Channel 10 used to send Fat Cat to bed.

Wedgie wrote:Kids, please refrain from the personal comments. They're only for me and fellow Admin and Mods

Sorry dad.

Spargo wrote:

Dols wrote:Hardly night and no drinks last night tard. Want to make it personal, I will.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1- 7:54pm is night, no refuting.
2- YOU made it personal when you started the name calling with tard.
Maybe you SHOULD have a drink, legend.

ok I will


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wedgie wrote:Kids, please refrain from the personal comments. They're only for me and fellow Admin and Mods

Hooray!!

I can make personal comments!!

Where's that Booney pr!ck!