SA Footy

whufc wrote:

OnSong wrote:

HH3 wrote:

OnSong wrote:Think of the money they will save from not having to bring the tarps!

You do realise Ports reputation is rising, whereas the Crows are making themselves out to be cockheads....

Eventually the tables could turn, and Port might be wearing the State guernsey, coz they'll be the "team for all South Australians"

Won't happen

That's what west coast said about Freo and look how close that's getting

With that arrogance of yours you could be mistaken for trigg

Well, off-field success could make it easier to afford the tarps. I guess that's a positive.

whufc wrote:This plot of land we call South Australia must have done something really bad in a past life

We have be dealt the hand of life that includes

Adelaide Crows
Port Power
Redbacks
Adelaide United
Adelaide Rams

I think its because of all the negativity that comes from people who live in SA. Most of what is written on this forum is negative whether it be about the Crows, Power, SA Cricket, SA Soccer etc.

Get this:

SANFL club presidents are questioning why they were not consulted. Norwood president Joe Tripodi told The Advertiser: "We should have been notified and consulted."

Why? So you could disregard your members wishes and sell them out? Again?

Crows cant wear the State Jumper herd about 10 mins ago

Sanity prevails.

RB wrote:Sanity prevails.

Maybe from the SANFL but not from the Crows, should never have got this far in the 1st place.

Gotta love G McIntosh's quote about the Crows: "That's what happens when people in bullshit castles make bullshit decisions".
You Macca are a deadset LEGEND!

cracka wrote:

whufc wrote:This plot of land we call South Australia must have done something really bad in a past life

We have be dealt the hand of life that includes

Adelaide Crows
Port Power
Redbacks
Adelaide United
Adelaide Rams

I think its because of all the negativity that comes from people who live in SA. Most of what is written on this forum is negative whether it be about the Crows, Power, SA Cricket, SA Soccer etc.

WRONG!
It's because those clubs are run by peanuts and in the case of most of them supported by peanuts.
Adelaide City and the 36ers have done quite well at times.

Think the big wigs at the AFL might have had something to do with the reversal!!!!!

"SANFL club presidents are questioning why they were not consulted.

Norwood president Joe Tripodi told The Advertiser: "We should have been notified and consulted."

Also in question is why the SANFL administration did not pass Adelaide's request to the SA Football Commission in the first place."

So Whicker didn't let the commission or the SANFL clubs know of this decision? Just how much hubris does Whicker and the AFC have?

Wedgie wrote:Gotta love G McIntosh's quote about the Crows: "That's what happens when people in bullshit castles make bullshit decisions".
You Macca are a deadset LEGEND!

Didn't miss anyone LOL.

regards,

REB

DOC wrote:Get this:

SANFL club presidents are questioning why they were not consulted. Norwood president Joe Tripodi told The Advertiser: "We should have been notified and consulted."

Why? So you could disregard your members wishes and sell them out? Again?

Gosh am I that pre-diddly-ictable? See you in Vegas.

regards,

REB

Wedgie wrote:

cracka wrote:

whufc wrote:This plot of land we call South Australia must have done something really bad in a past life

We have be dealt the hand of life that includes

Adelaide Crows
Port Power
Redbacks
Adelaide United
Adelaide Rams

I think its because of all the negativity that comes from people who live in SA. Most of what is written on this forum is negative whether it be about the Crows, Power, SA Cricket, SA Soccer etc.

WRONG!
It's because those clubs are run by peanuts and in the case of most of them supported by peanuts.
Adelaide City and the 36ers have done quite well at times.

I'm pretty sure that if I could be bothered going through the basketball thread I'd find negative things written about the 36ers.
The crows, power, redbacks & united all have done quite well at times as well but that doesn't stop the crap being written.

Isn't it amazing former South Australian football greats who wore that jumper before the crows came into existence talked down on the crows wearing it. Honestly what right do the crows have of wearing that Jumper sweet F.A. correct me if I am wrong and I will be happily corrected but weren't the crows at the time against State of Origin football? Weren't they complaining that their "Stars" May get injured in a meaningless game and pretty much killed it. Now they want to claim the rights to that jumper. I got two words for them **** OFF. I am a Victorian and even I disagreed with the Crows wearing that jumper. That would be like the Western Bulldogs demanding the AFL they should be allowed to wear the big white V because Teddy Whitten wore that jumper 31 times and the was the chairman of selectors. I am glad the SANFL have finally stood up to the crows and said no to them. To all you crow Wanks saying the Crows were founded on 9 clubs it was 10 people forget Woodville. Also the crows were only founded because Port went to the AFL and said OI we want in. The then SANFL crapped themselves and hastily made the crows up so that they could prevent the Magpies getting into the AFL. Port played the hand the AFL wanted. Because back in 1986 the then VFL wanted a SA team with a WA team into the VFL and they were told the South Australian public are not ready for VFL football. Even as far back as 1981 when a combined Port-Norwood side was offered South Melbourne's VFL License and the SANFL turned it down.
No AFL team has the right to a State jumper West Coast copped flack for wearing the WA one back in 2007 and the last time the crows did try this stunt they has to ADD the AFC on the front as the SANFL then said no to them using SA. The team for all South Australian is just a marketing stunt much like The University of Texas using we are Texas.

Wedgie wrote:Gotta love G McIntosh's quote about the Crows: "That's what happens when people in bullshit castles make bullshit decisions".
You Macca are a deadset LEGEND!

Macca for next Adelaide CEO!

cracka wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

cracka wrote:

whufc wrote:This plot of land we call South Australia must have done something really bad in a past life

We have be dealt the hand of life that includes

Adelaide Crows
Port Power
Redbacks
Adelaide United
Adelaide Rams

I think its because of all the negativity that comes from people who live in SA. Most of what is written on this forum is negative whether it be about the Crows, Power, SA Cricket, SA Soccer etc.

WRONG!
It's because those clubs are run by peanuts and in the case of most of them supported by peanuts.
Adelaide City and the 36ers have done quite well at times.

I'm pretty sure that if I could be bothered going through the basketball thread I'd find negative things written about the 36ers.
The crows, power, redbacks & united all have done quite well at times as well but that doesn't stop the crap being written.

Please tell me when the redbacks have done well. How far back are we going?

What a shame the 2 AFL reserves sides entering the SANFL didn't get the same response as this (comparatively small) issue.

The Sleeping Giant wrote:

cracka wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

cracka wrote:I think its because of all the negativity that comes from people who live in SA. Most of what is written on this forum is negative whether it be about the Crows, Power, SA Cricket, SA Soccer etc.

WRONG!
It's because those clubs are run by peanuts and in the case of most of them supported by peanuts.
Adelaide City and the 36ers have done quite well at times.

I'm pretty sure that if I could be bothered going through the basketball thread I'd find negative things written about the 36ers.
The crows, power, redbacks & united all have done quite well at times as well but that doesn't stop the crap being written.

Please tell me when the redbacks have done well. How far back are we going?

Didn't they win the Ryobi cup in 2011/12.

Once in 28 years.......in a 6 team comp.

Sheffield shield once in 31 years.

Macca19 wrote:

Wedgie wrote:What a completely irrelevant piece of prose.

This. I dont think ive ever read such a pile of wank in my life.

Come on Macca, surely you must have read The Creed (tm) once or twice?