could port & norwood finish bottom 2 ?

the once mighty teams, well can/will they ? some possibility i'd think
Interceptor wrote:Willing to put any money on that bayman?![]()
I'll give you one thing -that two of these clubs' favourite sons have now suffered nightmare-like coaching careers.
GWW wrote:Interceptor wrote:Do you think Trevor Hill is really a favourite son at Norwood? His only connection to the club is coaching the Redlegs the last few years, having previously been a player at North and WT. Or are you referring to McIntosh as Norwood's favourite son?
Barto wrote:Interesting times if it happens.
Of the two, I doubt Norwood will finish at the foot of the table.
bayman wrote:the once mighty teams, well can/will they ? some possibility i'd think
Interceptor wrote:Willing to put any money on that bayman?![]()
bayman wrote:the once mighty teams, well can/will they ? some possibility i'd think
SABRE wrote:bayman wrote:the once mighty teams, well can/will they ? some possibility i'd think
Your polarising suggestion deserves full points for bravery 'bayman'.
Although history is against it, if my research is correct (cue-spelly), it has happened only once.
I understand 1886 saw a four team competition where the season ended as follows:
1st - Adelaide
2nd - South Adelaide
3rd - Norwood
4th - Port Adelaide
I believe that the only other time we & Port came close to bottom together,
was in the six team comp. of 1900:
4th - Norwood
5th - West Adelaide
6th - Port Adelaide
Info taken from & thanks given to - Full Points Footy
Booney wrote:Barto wrote:Interesting times if it happens.
Of the two, I doubt Norwood will finish at the foot of the table.
Getting a long way ahead of yourself with that avatar Barto. Although we are struggling at the moment we have Wets and South to play soon.
Just because you have a plethora of spoons in your cupboard it doesn't mean that in May you can start giving them away...