Page 1 of 1
Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:27 pmby MightyEagles
Eagles v Port @ Woodville
U16s
Eagles 2.0 3.3 6.6 9.8.62
Port 2.5 7.5 10.7 15.7.97
Umpireing was crap. I think they watch too much AFL footy.
U18s
Eagles 0.2 4.10 7.10 11.12.78
Port 5.2 6.4 10.11 11.16.82
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:01 pmby Bluedemon
I have noticed in the U/16's that they are calling the sling tackles a lot.
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:03 pmby whatever
Read Carefully
Under 16's
Norwood 3.4 10.10 19.13 24.18 162
North 3.0 4.0 4.3 5.4 34
Under 18's
Norwood 3.3 5.4 8.7 20.9 129
North 4.5 9.7 17.9 18.10 118
no typos in the under 18's result
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:06 pmby whatever
As for umpiring.
Under 16's excellent
Under 18's very poor.
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:11 pmby am Bays
whatever wrote:Norwood 3.3 5.4 8.7 20.9 129
North 4.5 9.7 17.9 18.10 118
no typos in the under 18's result
Did they swap Guernseys at 3/4 time Whatever??? Up by over nine goals to lose by two???
Spelly that has got to be some kind of record for the entire SANFL competition.
What do you say as a) the winning coach and b) the losing coach.
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:21 pmby whatever
North basically couldn't get the hand on a contested ball in the last quarter.
Their under 17's were killing Norwood for the first 3 quarters.
Norwood decided to play the way they should in the last and just brushed North aside like they should have all day
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:29 pmby spell_check
Well, it absolutely smashed the previous under 19s record. 36 points was the greatest:
Round 3 1965
Norwood 2.3 5.4 7.7 14.8 (92)
North 7.2 12.6 13.7 14.7 (91)
Round 9 1989
North 2.2 3.7 4.8 11.15 (81)
Sturt 5.2 5.4 10.8 10.9 (69)
However, there has been one even greater. In the Reserves, the margin was 59 points:
Round 17 1978
Woodville 2.2 3.9 5.10 16.13 (109)
Port 6.8 9.11 14.15 15.18 (108)
And in that night series match between Glenelg and Sturt, Glenelg were 59 points behind at the start of the last quarter.
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:11 pmby am Bays
yeah but they are under 11 goal turn-arounds this is over 11 goals.
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:19 pmby spell_check
am Bays wrote:yeah but they are under 11 goal turn-arounds this is over 11 goals.
I was thinking of the margin overcome - 56 points.
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:36 amby MightyEagles
whatever wrote:As for umpiring.
Under 16's excellent
Under 18's very poor.
If you are talking about the umpires yesterday at Woodville, you must have seen a different game to the ones that the Port Timekeeper and the game that I saw. The Port Timekeeper wasn't happy with the standard of the umpires.
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:36 pmby whatever
I was talking about the umpiring at prospect yesterday
Re: Rd 5 u16/rd 4 u18 results
Posted:
Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:52 pmby MightyEagles
whatever wrote:I was talking about the umpiring at prospect yesterday
That's fine then, the games at Woodville were the other way round.