Wayde Mills report

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Wayde Mills report

Postby Harry the Horse » Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:54 am

Can anyone explain to me how you can be found guilty for striking an "unknown" Woodville-West Torrens player?

Was at the game although didn't see this incident. Still, how can the League make a charge stick if they don't know who he hit? Anyone see it?
User avatar
Harry the Horse
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:13 am
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 23 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby Big Phil » Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:13 pm

Harry the Horse wrote:Can anyone explain to me how you can be found guilty for striking an "unknown" Woodville-West Torrens player?

Was at the game although didn't see this incident. Still, how can the League make a charge stick if they don't know who he hit? Anyone see it?


On watching a taped replay of the game the other night, there were a few big bralws in this game so perhaps it was in one of them ?
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20299
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby Pseudo » Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:27 pm

Big Phil wrote:On watching a taped replay of the game the other night, there were a few big bralws in this game so perhaps it was in one of them ?

I had heard that there was no video footage of the specific incident.

I don't know if Mills pleaded guilty, which would make video evidence redundant.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12254
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby Grahaml » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:11 pm

If they can be sure he hit someone, but not sure who surely he's still guilty? I see how it would be tough to have a situation where this could happen, but perhaps if the umpire saw him hit a player, but was immediately more concerned with breaking up a fracas than getting the number of the player who was hit, this could happen.
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby Big Phil » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Pseudo wrote:
Big Phil wrote:On watching a taped replay of the game the other night, there were a few big bralws in this game so perhaps it was in one of them ?

I had heard that there was no video footage of the specific incident.

I don't know if Mills pleaded guilty, which would make video evidence redundant.


I'm pretty sure it said in the paper Mills pleaded NOT GUILTY Pseudo...
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20299
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby wycbloods » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:34 pm

Was he suspended or given a reprimand?
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby Harry the Horse » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:39 pm

Got one game after pleading not guilty. So no video evidence ... and they've accepted the word of an umpire who said ... "Duh, I saw him hit someone."

Interesting.
User avatar
Harry the Horse
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:13 am
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 23 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby redandblack » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:57 pm

I also watched the game tape. The reaction of the Eagles player certainly suggested that something untoward had happened.

That's not evidence, but.......
redandblack
 

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby wycbloods » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:59 pm

Harry the Horse wrote:Got one game after pleading not guilty. So no video evidence ... and they've accepted the word of an umpire who said ... "Duh, I saw him hit someone."

Interesting.


Thanks

So Mills, Backwell and Grima are all chances to miss the game V the bloods. Should make for a closer game than i had anticipated.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby Harry the Horse » Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:00 pm

You can add Logan to that who will def play for the Powders
User avatar
Harry the Horse
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:13 am
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 23 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby wycbloods » Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:01 pm

Harry the Horse wrote:You can add Logan to that who will def play for the Powders


Geez it gets better all the time :D
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby Dirko » Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:09 pm

What a crock of shit...

WM: "I plead not guilty of hitting the bloke who no-one knows if I hit or not"

SANFL: "OK, looking at the video which there's none, and after listening to the umpire
say he had no idea who you hit, you're guilty"

WM: "OK, umm, can you please explain how I was sent off with the blood rule from a
bleeding nose & chin, and why some Eagles bloke wasn't reported as well?"

SANFL: "um we had no conclusive evidence, but nontheless, we'll give you a game"

******* Morons..... :roll:
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby MAY-Z » Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:12 pm

Grahaml wrote:If they can be sure he hit someone, but not sure who surely he's still guilty? I see how it would be tough to have a situation where this could happen, but perhaps if the umpire saw him hit a player, but was immediately more concerned with breaking up a fracas than getting the number of the player who was hit, this could happen.


lol at that comment - when the fight was on in teh last qtr teh only umpire that was anywhere near it for the duration of about 2-3 mins was a boundary umpire.

then acouple of minutes later in the same spot the fight starts again but with the ball in the area this time the umpire is only watching the fight and not the play
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby MAY-Z » Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:14 pm

redandblack wrote:I also watched the game tape. The reaction of the Eagles player certainly suggested that something untoward had happened.

That's not evidence, but.......


agreed he probably did hit someone but mills was teh only player to come off the ground under the blood rule after getting a whack to the face so there is probably a lucky eagles player out there too
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby drebin » Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:22 pm

Another baffling outcome from the "Tribunal" (using that term loosely too). One game for striking who??? No body knows yet he gets "conked" on the "snozzer" himself and no one gets done for that?

Surely the umps could have just picked any Eagles player and blamed him (apparently you don't need to too much evidence these days!) and given him one to even it up or better still do nothing to anyone!

The whole reporting / tribunal hearing system has become a laughing stock almost beyond a joke these days and it is time for the SANFL to overhaul it.
drebin
 

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby BL&G_Ump » Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:29 pm

Judging by the amount of Eagles players running around with head strapping, Mills had a field day!!!!
BL&G_Ump
Rookie
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:46 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby Mickyj » Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:38 pm

MAY-Z wrote:
Grahaml wrote:If they can be sure he hit someone, but not sure who surely he's still guilty? I see how it would be tough to have a situation where this could happen, but perhaps if the umpire saw him hit a player, but was immediately more concerned with breaking up a fracas than getting the number of the player who was hit, this could happen.


lol at that comment - when the fight was on in teh last qtr teh only umpire that was anywhere near it for the duration of about 2-3 mins was a boundary umpire.

then acouple of minutes later in the same spot the fight starts again but with the ball in the area this time the umpire is only watching the fight and not the play


yep true
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby Mickyj » Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:39 pm

drebin wrote:Another baffling outcome from the "Tribunal" (using that term loosely too). One game for striking who??? No body knows yet he gets "conked" on the "snozzer" himself and no one gets done for that?

Surely the umps could have just picked any Eagles player and blamed him (apparently you don't need to too much evidence these days!) and given him one to even it up or better still do nothing to anyone!

The whole reporting / tribunal hearing system has become a laughing stock almost beyond a joke these days and it is time for the SANFL to overhaul it.


Perhaps he got hit in retaliation to who he hit .I have no idea as I was trying to watch both the ball and the first fight.then the second or restarted fight.
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby MatteeG » Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:40 pm

BL&G_Ump wrote:Judging by the amount of Eagles players running around with head strapping, Mills had a field day!!!!


Apparently all the bays players kept running into other Eags players due to their panic to get away from Cheep... :roll:
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
User avatar
MatteeG
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4926
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:36 pm
Has liked: 519 times
Been liked: 510 times
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Wayde Mills report

Postby Mickyj » Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:41 pm

BL&G_Ump wrote:Judging by the amount of Eagles players running around with head strapping, Mills had a field day!!!!


Nah BL&G
Eagles players where hitting heads going for the ball .
Bays players were shouldering each other in a marking contest.it could have been worse the second bays player hit the first one very hard.
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |