by Brucetiki » Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:40 am
by Barto » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:42 am
Brucetiki wrote:Bring back last year's ad - that was brilliant.
by whufc » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:50 am
by sjt » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:38 pm
Brucetiki wrote:Just saw the new SANFL television ad, and must admit I'm very disappointed with it.
Very tacky, and along the lines of the infamous Tim Shaw ads from a few years ago. Also a few slight exaggerations (why pay $90?) as well.
Bring back last year's ad - that was brilliant.
by JK » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:44 pm
by Dirko » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:48 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:I actually didn't think it was too bad, certainly better than the Tim Shaw days
by smac » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:52 pm
SJABC wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:I actually didn't think it was too bad, certainly better than the Tim Shaw days
I agree. Snout's Hill was a bit down on numbers though
by nickname » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:27 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:I actually didn't think it was too bad, certainly better than the Tim Shaw days
by Dirko » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:31 pm
smac wrote:Must have used footage from after the GF then...
by Barto » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:41 pm
whufc wrote:BUT the delivery is terrible.
by Dutchy » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:42 pm
whufc wrote:On the new ad the concept is ok, BUT the delivery is terrible.
.
by Brucetiki » Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:33 pm
sjt wrote:Brucetiki wrote:Just saw the new SANFL television ad, and must admit I'm very disappointed with it.
Very tacky, and along the lines of the infamous Tim Shaw ads from a few years ago. Also a few slight exaggerations (why pay $90?) as well.
Bring back last year's ad - that was brilliant.
Agree last years theme was better. I guess their message is directed at getting kids back to the footy off the couch. The $90 would be referring to what it costs for an computer game. My nephew paid $99 for one Xbox game.
by am Bays » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:05 pm
by Columbo » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:23 pm
nickname wrote:Agreed. Not appalling but uninspired and uninspiring. Vision of people queueing to buy food - that'll get the masses excited.
by JK » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:31 pm
by Lunchcutter » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:40 pm
by CoverKing » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:44 pm
whufc wrote:On the new ad the concept is ok, BUT the delivery is terrible.
Was it just me or was there a fair chunk of the add showing highlights with Central in it. Not that im complaining also come to think about it i don't recall seeing South or West in there.
by spell_check » Wed Mar 25, 2009 4:55 pm
CoverKing wrote:whufc wrote:On the new ad the concept is ok, BUT the delivery is terrible.
Was it just me or was there a fair chunk of the add showing highlights with Central in it. Not that im complaining also come to think about it i don't recall seeing South or West in there.
lol there is definitely no south or west! suppose we probably dont have many if any highlights
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |