Page 1 of 6

Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:44 pm
by bayman
well who could tip this confidently, obviously the make up of the teams will be crucial & while they were only trial games i have seen both teams play & at least southh went forward when they had the ball

i'll tip south but with no confidence

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:18 pm
by Thiele
I have confidence in the Bloods. Go West Adeliade

It will be a long day 4 games

u/16's 8.45 am
Resereves 11.15 am
League 2 pm
u/18s 4.45 pm

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:25 pm
by redandblack
bayman wrote:well who could tip this confidently, obviously the make up of the teams will be crucial & while they were only trial games i have seen both teams play & at least southh went forward when they had the ball

i'll tip south but with no confidence


They went forward often enough last week against Central to have 25 scoring shots, bayman.

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:30 pm
by wycbloods
We will beat south, Noarlunga holds no fears for us. We actually play good footy there. As bayman said the make-up of the sides will be important but I will, with confidence, tip the bloods by 6 goals.

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:32 pm
by Thiele
If i rember correctly we have won 2 of the past 3 times we have been up there

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:39 pm
by bayman
redandblack wrote:
bayman wrote:well who could tip this confidently, obviously the make up of the teams will be crucial & while they were only trial games i have seen both teams play & at least southh went forward when they had the ball

i'll tip south but with no confidence


They went forward often enough last week against Central to have 25 scoring shots, bayman.



hang on what did i write ? ''i have seen both teams play & at least south went forward when they had the ball'' which means exactly that what I SAW ;)

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:08 pm
by southee
wycbloods wrote:We will beat south, Noarlunga holds no fears for us. We actually play good footy there. As bayman said the make-up of the sides will be important but I will, with confidence, tip the bloods by 6 goals.


Very true...Westies always play well up there.

Hate to say it...Bloods by 3 to 4 goals. :(

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:57 am
by redandblack
bayman wrote:
redandblack wrote:
bayman wrote:well who could tip this confidently, obviously the make up of the teams will be crucial & while they were only trial games i have seen both teams play & at least southh went forward when they had the ball

i'll tip south but with no confidence


They went forward often enough last week against Central to have 25 scoring shots, bayman.



hang on what did i write ? ''i have seen both teams play & at least south went forward when they had the ball'' which means exactly that what I SAW ;)


And I wrote exactly what I saw last week :)

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:51 pm
by mr o
bloods by 5 goals

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:03 pm
by Strawb
Bloods to win lets hope our kicking improves

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:46 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
after what i saw today WEST WILL WIN quite comfortably

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:41 pm
by dash61
bayman wrote:well who could tip this confidently, obviously the make up of the teams will be crucial & while they were only trial games i have seen both teams play & at least southh went forward when they had the ball

i'll tip south but with no confidence


Bayman you saw us half strength against Norwood, It was our first trial but Norwood had already played the bays the week before and beaten them by the same as they beat us, they played a bench of 12, we had 4 and matched possession with them for a good part of the game.
We have since beaten Centrals and smashed Port Adelaide, so dont write us off yet :lol:

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:51 pm
by bayman
dash61 wrote:
bayman wrote:well who could tip this confidently, obviously the make up of the teams will be crucial & while they were only trial games i have seen both teams play & at least southh went forward when they had the ball

i'll tip south but with no confidence


Bayman you saw us half strength against Norwood, It was our first trial but Norwood had already played the bays the week before and beaten them by the same as they beat us, they played a bench of 12, we had 4 and matched possession with them for a good part of the game.
We have since beaten Centrals and smashed Port Adelaide, so dont write us off yet :lol:


unless west decide to play cupido up forward & try & score rather than flood then they could finish above 8th but atm i've only seen them once & will go on what i've seen yes west had players out that day but every team in trials have players out....remember when cupido played for south 1 year & 55 or thereabout goals for the year, the best way to win games is to kick more goals than your opponent, you've beaten an experimenting central & a team behind the others according to port gurus like NO MERCY etc, dash please do not get carried away with a trial as they DO NOT COUNT

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:12 am
by Thiele
From what i saw in th past couple of weeks Cupido has started on the wing

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:18 am
by redandblack
Bayman, the last two weeks West have had 25 scoring shots against Central and now 30, yes 30, scoring shots against Port.

Do we judge Glenelg on their first trial of the year against Norwood, as you are doing? You tell dash that trials do not count, so don't judge a team on them, but you then immediately judge West on a trial :?

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:33 am
by dash61
Very good post R&B

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:14 am
by Wedgie
West by plenty, probably 7-10 goals.

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:23 pm
by bayman
redandblack wrote:Bayman, the last two weeks West have had 25 scoring shots against Central and now 30, yes 30, scoring shots against Port.

Do we judge Glenelg on their first trial of the year against Norwood, as you are doing? You tell dash that trials do not count, so don't judge a team on them, but you then immediately judge West on a trial :?



you blokes only read what you want to or i don't write it clearly enough, i judged west on the fact the game plan on one night hasn't changed & until I SEE differently i'll have that opinion as it will be MY $$$$$$$$$ punting on footy so i'll rely on MY JUDGEMENT as it usually is profitable.............for the record i WONT be betting in the south v west game or the norwood v port game...depending on the odds (if there is value) i'll be betting on the other 2 games

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:36 pm
by mr o
do not get to excited about the up and coming season, westies supporters, we may get accused of talking up the team, to much, from the likes of mickyj and co,i beleave the term was spruking ??

Re: Rd 1 2009 South v West @ Noarlunga

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:21 pm
by redandblack
So, bayman, if a team has only a dozen scoring shots when you're at a game, then has 25 and 30 scoring shots in their next two games, you don't believe they've either changed their game plan or are effecting it better, because you didn't see it.

Whatever way I read your posts, you're judging West on a trial and then telling dash61 not to judge teams on trials.