Port v North trial @ Alberton

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby Big Phil » Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:42 am

Only have final scores, no other results. Anyone that was at the game care to make comment on what they saw...

Final Score:

Port - 19.15 = 129
North 9.7 = 61


Port Adelaide by 68 points.
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20299
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby whatever » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:02 am

I am no good at this stuff but better than nothing

Port 4.1 9.4 12.8 19.15
North 3.2 6.3 7.5 9.7

Mercer, Lobbe 3, Clayton, Mardling, Perkins, Waterhouse 2, Bowes, Murray, Dolling, Weetra 1
Stewart, Millar, Brown, Tapscott, Thiele 1

yes I know some are missing, better than nothing though

PORT

Gareth Bowes - very good, a Clayton look alike but more of a link man and deliverer to the forwards. Foot skills looked average early but in the second half he kept hitting targets.

Lobbe - looks to lumber around but as a key forward he kept making the contest and takes the pressure off of Mercer and Waterhouse. Competes well at ground level, good mark without having strong hands.

Barham - contested well at CHF but hardly touched it, he wont dominate but again he adds structure to the forward line.

NORTH

Cohen Thiele - dominated early, a real relevation. Now ready for senior football.


North played a lot of kids so dont read a lot into the result other than Port is a better outfit than last year. Magpie supporters get on board. Top 3 a possibility.

North supporters will finally see some kids get pushed up to the seniors.

NOTE : Phil Davis played the reserves, shocking first quarter but very good after that in the reserves. He will play a lot of senior football this year. He has added a bit of size to his frame.
whatever
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby Mic » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:09 am

First half was fairly close. North rested a few players in the 2nd half like White and Sporn. Don't know about Port but North had lots of players missing like Allan, Younie, Alleway, etc. Port seemed to take the game very seriously, one of their guys got reported for a hip-and-shoulder to the head. Decent 'crowd' there, 200-300 people, Port supporters seemed very excited about the win.
User avatar
Mic
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:17 pm
Has liked: 171 times
Been liked: 156 times

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby Mickyj » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:42 am

Mic wrote:First half was fairly close. North rested a few players in the 2nd half like White and Sporn. Don't know about Port but North had lots of players missing like Allan, Younie, Alleway, etc. Port seemed to take the game very seriously, one of their guys got reported for a hip-and-shoulder to the head. Decent 'crowd' there, 200-300 people, Port supporters seemed very excited about the win.


Seeing last week they lost ;)
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby topsywaldron » Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:09 am

Mic wrote:Port supporters seemed very excited about the win.


I'm eagerly awaiting beenreal's summation of yet another glorious stepping stone on the shining path of Port's transcendent rise to the exalted altar.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby beenreal » Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:27 am

topsywaldron wrote:
Mic wrote:Port supporters seemed very excited about the win.


I'm eagerly awaiting beenreal's summation of yet another glorious stepping stone on the shining path of Port's transcendent rise to the exalted altar.


Good signs for the Magpies as they sounded a warning to the rest of the competition. Very potent attack with multiple goal kickers:
Mercer 4, Loobe 3, Clayton, Waterhouse, Dolling, Perkins 2, Mardling, Murray, Saunders, Bowes 1.

Good to see Clive give off four handballs as well. :shock:

North were missing Alleway, Ackland, Allan, McEntee, Ryswyk, Younie, and O'Hara, but we were missing a couple, and you can only beat the opposition that comes your way.
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby Mickyj » Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:48 am

beenreal wrote:
topsywaldron wrote:
Mic wrote:Port supporters seemed very excited about the win.


I'm eagerly awaiting beenreal's summation of yet another glorious stepping stone on the shining path of Port's transcendent rise to the exalted altar.


Good signs for the Magpies as they sounded a warning to the rest of the competition. Very potent attack with multiple goal kickers:
Mercer 4, Loobe 3, Clayton, Waterhouse, Dolling, Perkins 2, Mardling, Murray, Saunders, Bowes 1.

Good to see Clive give off four handballs as well. :shock:

North were missing Alleway, Ackland, Allan, McEntee, Ryswyk, Younie, and O'Hara, but we were missing a couple, and you can only beat the opposition that comes your way.


Beenreal how did the Magpies improve from the week before ?
And if stated above there was 200 - 300 why would there appear less fans than the week before when the Power was playing ?I suppose the North faithful stayed home .
and i am asking a serious question not taking the Piss .as last week the Magpies started like a train on fire .then went missing and then came back.

cheers
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby SDK » Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:55 am

The competion needs a strong Port and Norwood and it looks like we will get that this year.
North are an unknown quantity yet but I think they will be right up there at end of year.
I think South and West are the only two who you would not expect to make the finals. Westies can not play finals with that list and game plan.

First game Norwood v Port....can not wait !
SDK
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 51 times

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby beenreal » Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:35 pm

Mickyj wrote:
beenreal wrote:
topsywaldron wrote:
Mic wrote:
Good signs for the Magpies as they sounded a warning to the rest of the competition. Very potent attack with multiple goal kickers:
Mercer 4, Loobe 3, Clayton, Waterhouse, Dolling, Perkins 2, Mardling, Murray, Saunders, Bowes 1.

Good to see Clive give off four handballs as well. :shock:

North were missing Alleway, Ackland, Allan, McEntee, Ryswyk, Younie, and O'Hara, but we were missing a couple, and you can only beat the opposition that comes your way.


Beenreal how did the Magpies improve from the week before ?
And if stated above there was 200 - 300 why would there appear less fans than the week before when the Power was playing ?I suppose the North faithful stayed home .
and i am asking a serious question not taking the Piss .as last week the Magpies started like a train on fire .then went missing and then came back.

cheers


Not sure about last week because I was at Day On The Green. Asked around about last week though and was told Tim G took Jeremy Clayton, Ah Chee, Summerton, Dolling, Lokan, Saunders, Elstone and DePasquale off for the last quarter.

I did comment to a Mate about the good crowd numbers, with a fair few North supporters there as well.
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby Mickyj » Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:21 pm

beenreal wrote:
Beenreal how did the Magpies improve from the week before ?
And if stated above there was 200 - 300 why would there appear less fans than the week before when the Power was playing ?I suppose the North faithful stayed home .
and i am asking a serious question not taking the Piss .as last week the Magpies started like a train on fire .then went missing and then came back.

cheers
[/quote][/quote]

Not sure about last week because I was at Day On The Green. Asked around about last week though and was told Tim G took Jeremy Clayton, Ah Chee, Summerton, Dolling, Lokan, Saunders, Elstone and DePasquale off for the last quarter.

I did comment to a Mate about the good crowd numbers, with a fair few North supporters there as well.[/quote]

Last week very few magpie fans (compared to normal game without the Power).
Tim G was changing everyone last week .I think you guys ran the Eagles almost to stand still but not all the way,changing four guys at once.
So really the Magpies are not that much better than last week by reading your comments.
Perhaps someone who saw both games could enlighten us better .Far to early to say Port will shake the dogs of their purch.
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby Wedgie » Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:22 pm

There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby Mickyj » Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:12 pm

Wedgie wrote:There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!


Thanks Wedgie I thought that total was a bit low.
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby NFC » Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:59 pm

whatever wrote:NOTE : Phil Davis played the reserves, shocking first quarter but very good after that in the reserves. He will play a lot of senior football this year. He has added a bit of size to his frame.

Thanks mate. Where did he play, in defence? What improved in his game from the first quarter?
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby NFC » Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:00 pm

Wedgie wrote:There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!

The crowds at the two Norwood trials have been much larger than I've ever seen before. This is encouraging for the league.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby whufc » Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:20 pm

NFC wrote:
Wedgie wrote:There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!

The crowds at the two Norwood trials have been much larger than I've ever seen before. This is encouraging for the league.


Is this a reflection of the crap style of football that is being played in the NAB cup, are people finally coming back to the good guys.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28772
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2852 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby NFC » Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:33 pm

whufc wrote:
NFC wrote:
Wedgie wrote:There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!

The crowds at the two Norwood trials have been much larger than I've ever seen before. This is encouraging for the league.


Is this a reflection of the crap style of football that is being played in the NAB cup, are people finally coming back to the good guys.

Apart from the Crows, I've watched maybe 50 mins total of the NAB Cup.

The NAB Cup is awful and gets worse every year. Rule changes + garbage squads + poor umpiring = rubbish and boring competition.

Just bring on Rd.1 already...
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby Pseudo » Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:12 pm

NFC wrote:The NAB Cup is awful and gets worse every year. Rule changes + garbage squads + poor umpiring = rubbish and boring competition.

Just like the AFL season proper then. Bring on the SANFL...
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12254
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby Voice » Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:42 pm

NFC wrote:
Wedgie wrote:There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!

The crowds at the two Norwood trials have been much larger than I've ever seen before. This is encouraging for the league.

The crowd at Arctic Park wasn't to bad either. A bit harder to judge though because everyone sits in their cars but it was alot more than I expected.
User avatar
Voice
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
Location: :noitacoL
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby whatever » Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:13 am

NFC wrote:
whatever wrote:NOTE : Phil Davis played the reserves, shocking first quarter but very good after that in the reserves. He will play a lot of senior football this year. He has added a bit of size to his frame.

Thanks mate. Where did he play, in defence? What improved in his game from the first quarter?


Davis was playing CHB.

In the first quarter he just looked totally lost like a player coming back from injury that had been out for two years. Wrong spot wrong time, which looked like a lack of endeavour but I think that would be to harsh on the boy.

From there he became a dominate figure at CHB making a few big spoils and having a physical presence in the marking contest. Almost tokk 3 or 4 big contested pack marks but did not quite hold the ball long enough but still took some good marks.

Suffered a bit from tying to play AFL football at reserves level by trying to find the perfect option rather than just playing football, this got better as the game went on.

All in all if you are a Crows supporter you would have to be happy to have him on your list.
whatever
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Port v North trial @ Alberton

Postby maidenmagpie » Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:44 am

its high time the advertiser starting giving the sanfl a bit of respect,its not all afl!!!
maidenmagpie
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:08 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |