by Big Phil » Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:42 am
by whatever » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:02 am
by Mic » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:09 am
by Mickyj » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:42 am
Mic wrote:First half was fairly close. North rested a few players in the 2nd half like White and Sporn. Don't know about Port but North had lots of players missing like Allan, Younie, Alleway, etc. Port seemed to take the game very seriously, one of their guys got reported for a hip-and-shoulder to the head. Decent 'crowd' there, 200-300 people, Port supporters seemed very excited about the win.
by topsywaldron » Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:09 am
Mic wrote:Port supporters seemed very excited about the win.
by beenreal » Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:27 am
topsywaldron wrote:Mic wrote:Port supporters seemed very excited about the win.
I'm eagerly awaiting beenreal's summation of yet another glorious stepping stone on the shining path of Port's transcendent rise to the exalted altar.
by Mickyj » Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:48 am
beenreal wrote:topsywaldron wrote:Mic wrote:Port supporters seemed very excited about the win.
I'm eagerly awaiting beenreal's summation of yet another glorious stepping stone on the shining path of Port's transcendent rise to the exalted altar.
Good signs for the Magpies as they sounded a warning to the rest of the competition. Very potent attack with multiple goal kickers:
Mercer 4, Loobe 3, Clayton, Waterhouse, Dolling, Perkins 2, Mardling, Murray, Saunders, Bowes 1.
Good to see Clive give off four handballs as well.![]()
North were missing Alleway, Ackland, Allan, McEntee, Ryswyk, Younie, and O'Hara, but we were missing a couple, and you can only beat the opposition that comes your way.
by SDK » Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:55 am
by beenreal » Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:35 pm
Mickyj wrote:beenreal wrote:topsywaldron wrote:Mic wrote:
Good signs for the Magpies as they sounded a warning to the rest of the competition. Very potent attack with multiple goal kickers:
Mercer 4, Loobe 3, Clayton, Waterhouse, Dolling, Perkins 2, Mardling, Murray, Saunders, Bowes 1.
Good to see Clive give off four handballs as well.![]()
North were missing Alleway, Ackland, Allan, McEntee, Ryswyk, Younie, and O'Hara, but we were missing a couple, and you can only beat the opposition that comes your way.
Beenreal how did the Magpies improve from the week before ?
And if stated above there was 200 - 300 why would there appear less fans than the week before when the Power was playing ?I suppose the North faithful stayed home .
and i am asking a serious question not taking the Piss .as last week the Magpies started like a train on fire .then went missing and then came back.
cheers
by Mickyj » Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:21 pm
[/quote][/quote]beenreal wrote:
Beenreal how did the Magpies improve from the week before ?
And if stated above there was 200 - 300 why would there appear less fans than the week before when the Power was playing ?I suppose the North faithful stayed home .
and i am asking a serious question not taking the Piss .as last week the Magpies started like a train on fire .then went missing and then came back.
cheers
by Wedgie » Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:22 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Mickyj » Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:12 pm
Wedgie wrote:There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!
by NFC » Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:59 pm
whatever wrote:NOTE : Phil Davis played the reserves, shocking first quarter but very good after that in the reserves. He will play a lot of senior football this year. He has added a bit of size to his frame.
by NFC » Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:00 pm
Wedgie wrote:There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!
by whufc » Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:20 pm
NFC wrote:Wedgie wrote:There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!
The crowds at the two Norwood trials have been much larger than I've ever seen before. This is encouraging for the league.
by NFC » Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:33 pm
whufc wrote:NFC wrote:Wedgie wrote:There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!
The crowds at the two Norwood trials have been much larger than I've ever seen before. This is encouraging for the league.
Is this a reflection of the crap style of football that is being played in the NAB cup, are people finally coming back to the good guys.
by Pseudo » Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:12 pm
NFC wrote:The NAB Cup is awful and gets worse every year. Rule changes + garbage squads + poor umpiring = rubbish and boring competition.
by Voice » Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:42 pm
NFC wrote:Wedgie wrote:There was a lot more than 200-300 there, I was amazed at how large the crowd was, largest Ive seen for a trial game probably ever. More there than most South/West league games. There was 200-300 in the bar alone!
The crowds at the two Norwood trials have been much larger than I've ever seen before. This is encouraging for the league.
by whatever » Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:13 am
NFC wrote:whatever wrote:NOTE : Phil Davis played the reserves, shocking first quarter but very good after that in the reserves. He will play a lot of senior football this year. He has added a bit of size to his frame.
Thanks mate. Where did he play, in defence? What improved in his game from the first quarter?
by maidenmagpie » Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:44 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |