Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:42 pmShould Sturt make the move from Unley to Mt Barker?
.Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:42 pmRe: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:54 pmNo too far for me and they should take that into consideration .
.Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:04 pmwell i've said no
i can see that they could get a 'hills' type of supporter base to add to its supporter base, however they would have to have an oval up to league standard & this could be the stumbling block as it could cost too much money to do so, for those that are thinking standard of oval just remember when we've had country games the league has inspected the ground & ammenities to see if they were up to a league standard
i can see that they could get a 'hills' type of supporter base to add to its supporter base, however they would have to have an oval up to league standard & this could be the stumbling block as it could cost too much money to do so, for those that are thinking standard of oval just remember when we've had country games the league has inspected the ground & ammenities to see if they were up to a league standard
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:53 pmBloody Oath ! Fantastic up at Mt Barker in the middle of winter ! 
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:05 pmSJABC wrote:Bloody Oath ! Fantastic up at Mt Barker in the middle of winter !
Real footy weather?
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:07 pmSojourner wrote:Should Sturt make the move from Unley to Mt Barker?
your not suggesting they move to the hills league & therefore giving the sanfl an 8 team comp ?
only kidding you blue boys
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:24 pmNo !!!
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:26 pmBlue Boy wrote:No !!!
Why not?
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:13 amWell, if they can't get the oval at Upper Sturt...
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:11 amNo. To far to travel by public transport
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:10 pmThiele wrote:No. To far to travel by public transport
its closer than Elizabeth
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:12 pmStuff Mt Barker, move 'em to Mt Gambier, get rid of 'em.
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:13 pmSojourner wrote:Should Sturt make the move from Unley to Mt Barker?
Mt. Barker, Western Australia - for sure.
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:29 pmThe Ash Man wrote:Stuff Mt Barker, move 'em to Mt Gambier, get rid of 'em.
Mt. Gambier is in Glenelg's zone. Would this mean the Bays could claim all the decent Sturt players?
BTW I voted no. Would be interested to see the split in votes from Sturt fans compared to the other 8 fan bases.
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:57 pmLovely location.
Not our Home!
Not our Home!
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:31 pmFurther out....
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 10:24 pmNo Way!!
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 10:42 pmI hear Siberia is after a footy team at the moment
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 10:43 pmInteresting poll to have on a board for supporters of all the clubs.
Re: Should Sturt move to Mt Barker
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 10:44 pmSnappyTom wrote:Sojourner wrote:Should Sturt make the move from Unley to Mt Barker?
Mt. Barker, Western Australia - for sure.
I'd be in that, except with the price of petrol it would cost just as much to go to a home game.