SA Footy

1. Warren (14 goals)
2. Cupido (13 goals)
3. Chambers (11 goals)
3. Vlatko (11 goals)
5. Rogers (10 goals)

Anyone know why Nick Gill and his 15 goals this season don't make the top spot or even the top 5 according to the paper?
Its not as though he would have slipped under the radar with a quiet one in Rd 4 and they definately counted the game as they added Chambers goals to his tally.
I'm amazed that they continuously find new ways to stuff up.

de Jongh also has 11 goals for the year.

They also have West as last even thought they have a better percentage than Sturt.

I checked this as after Friday I was sure we would be bottom - and by how much I wanted to find out by.

Might I add that I haven't seen the match statistics for North and Sturt yet. They don't publish them on Saturdays, but they're not in there today either.

spell_check wrote:Might I add that I haven't seen the match statistics for North and Sturt yet. They don't publish them on Saturdays, but they're not in there today either.

They're still trying to add up Nick Gill's marks and kicks!

Wedgie wrote:

spell_check wrote:Might I add that I haven't seen the match statistics for North and Sturt yet. They don't publish them on Saturdays, but they're not in there today either.

They're still trying to add up Nick Gill's marks and kicks!

That would figure.

But they had enough time to produce a big article about Wangas return to the SANFL and a pic of him and the coach???

drebin wrote:But they had enough time to produce a big article about Wangas return to the SANFL and a pic of him and the coach???

I think that statement says it all there Drebin in certain media's eyes there is only port adelaide in the sanfl !!
No offence to the port fans you people are ok is just the media

Definitely don't think there's a Port Adelaide bias at the Sunday Mail (I'm not a Port supporter, either).

Nonetheless, pretty poor to f.ck up the goalkicking ladder. Does anyone know where they source their info from - or is it all compiled in-house?

JessicaRabbit69 wrote:Definitely don't think there's a Port Adelaide bias at the Sunday Mail (I'm not a Port supporter, either).

Nonetheless, pretty poor to f.ck up the goalkicking ladder. Does anyone know where they source their info from - or is it all compiled in-house?

JessicaRabbit69 I wasnt just referring to the mail but the whole Adelaide media thats all.
My mind goes back to a finals game a few years ago when port played the Eagles at footy park with KG and Ebert broadcasting it was as if why would another team turn up and play when its a final with port adelaide in it , heavans forbide that Port lost it !!

the eagles and norwoods game review was very poor 2 different stories by the one reporter !!