SA Footy

does anyone know the results of vthe tribunal tonight, tuesday 18/4

its official, gowans is a prick, allegebly

Which one?

Adelaide Hawk wrote:Which one?

does it matter

What's the bet that C.Gowans got off.

MightyEagles wrote:What's the bet that C.Gowans got off.

Yep.

From Footysa

South Adelaide player David Clarke has been supended for one game at the SANFL tribunal last night.
Chris Gowans was found not guilty of striking Trevor Cranston.

It was a ridiculous report. It was a fair bump. The umpires would be better umpiring basketball. Although I don't want it thought that I am blaming Centrals poor effort on bad umpiring. Glenlelg would have won anyway.

doggies4eva wrote:It was a ridiculous report. It was a fair bump. The umpires would be better umpiring basketball. Although I don't want it thought that I am blaming Centrals poor effort on bad umpiring. Glenlelg would have won anyway.

I can't believe you just said that doggies4eva. I happened to be at the game, having a look and definately should have got matches. Listening in to 5RPH they even admitted he should get matches. Just another tribunal joke - proven time and time again that Centrals players get it easier at the tribunal, especially if their due to play the Eagles next week. In the past we have seen the gowans twins, even luke cowan escape suspension in the week leading up to the Eagles, mind you all were very reportable offences and should have received bans. Why I am so surprised. Get yourself a life tribunal panel and do the job your paid to do.

Ian wrote:

MightyEagles wrote:What's the bet that C.Gowans got off.

Yep.

From Footysa

South Adelaide player David Clarke has been supended for one game at the SANFL tribunal last night.
Chris Gowans was found not guilty of striking Trevor Cranston.

How many times have the Gowans got off at the tribunal in total now?

You Eagles supporters are a bunch of wankers bit like Jimmy.Was at the match saw it nothing in it,then confirmed what I saw on the replay later.Should never have been reported and who cares what the guys on the radio say,half the time they are dribbling shit and get most of the players names wrong.I do agree that Cowan should have been reported though but he will not play this week anyway.Look get that Eagles guy raffle ticket out of your eyes and try to watch the game a bit closer.Your side will prob flog us again this week anyway,half our side is out injured.

Watching the Gowans /Cranston incident last night on the tube and it looked iffy.

Don't think it should have resulted in games, reckless more than negligent/intentional.

However they should get done on stupidity and bringing the game into disrepute!!!

Cranston was a bit reckless himself wasn`t he,nobody whinging about him.Was there any real contact to Cranston,should never have been reported.Amazing how people only see what they want to see.Dont the Gowans twins have more premierships than the tigers.

eaglehaslanded wrote: proven time and time again that Centrals players get it easier at the tribunal, especially if their due to play the Eagles next week. In the past we have seen the gowans twins, even luke cowan escape suspension in the week leading up to the Eagles, mind you all were very reportable offences and should have received bans. Why I am so surprised.

What is it with you Eagles supporters always more hard done by than anyone else

Terry wrote:You Eagles supporters are a bunch of wankers bit like Jimmy.Was at the match saw it nothing in it,then confirmed what I saw on the replay later.Should never have been reported and who cares what the guys on the radio say,half the time they are dribbling shit and get most of the players names wrong.I do agree that Cowan should have been reported though but he will not play this week anyway.Look get that Eagles guy raffle ticket out of your eyes and try to watch the game a bit closer.Your side will prob flog us again this week anyway,half our side is out injured.

already thinking of excuses for their next loss???

i thought dogs fans never made excuses?

come on tierre

Any Gowans should get weeks just for being there in the first place. When will they learn?

Having watched the incident many times including slow motion, it was nothing but a hip and shoulder which caught the opposition player high.

All these negative comments about the Gowans are just sour grapes. The honest ones amongst you have named the Gowans as the players they would like to most have in their team. They are hard at the ball and skillfull. I would hate to see the game get any softer than it now is.

eaglehaslanded wrote:

doggies4eva wrote:It was a ridiculous report. It was a fair bump. The umpires would be better umpiring basketball. Although I don't want it thought that I am blaming Centrals poor effort on bad umpiring. Glenlelg would have won anyway.

I can't believe you just said that doggies4eva. I happened to be at the game, having a look and definately should have got matches. Listening in to 5RPH they even admitted he should get matches. Just another tribunal joke - proven time and time again that Centrals players get it easier at the tribunal, especially if their due to play the Eagles next week. In the past we have seen the gowans twins, even luke cowan escape suspension in the week leading up to the Eagles, mind you all were very reportable offences and should have received bans. Why I am so surprised. Get yourself a life tribunal panel and do the job your paid to do.

Boo hoo. Life is so unfair. The Eagles never get anything. Now run home and tell Mummy.

cennals05 wrote:

eaglehaslanded wrote:

doggies4eva wrote:It was a ridiculous report. It was a fair bump. The umpires would be better umpiring basketball. Although I don't want it thought that I am blaming Centrals poor effort on bad umpiring. Glenlelg would have won anyway.

I can't believe you just said that doggies4eva. I happened to be at the game, having a look and definately should have got matches. Listening in to 5RPH they even admitted he should get matches. Just another tribunal joke - proven time and time again that Centrals players get it easier at the tribunal, especially if their due to play the Eagles next week. In the past we have seen the gowans twins, even luke cowan escape suspension in the week leading up to the Eagles, mind you all were very reportable offences and should have received bans. Why I am so surprised. Get yourself a life tribunal panel and do the job your paid to do.

Boo hoo. Life is so unfair. The Eagles never get anything. Now run home and tell Mummy.

Maybe you misunderstood my quote earlier cennalso5. I wasn't stating how hard done by the Eagles were I was stating how good a run with the tribunal Centrals get especially the Gowans twins. For god sake they could just about king hit some poor bloke in front of the umpire and still get off with nothing more than a slap on the wrist. To put it quite frankly cennals05 I think the SANFL incl tribunal panel run scared from Centrals because they never seem to get handed out the appropiate penalties. If you do the crime you should do the time and unfortunately for some reason or another that doesn't normally happens when it comes to the Dogs.

I'm amazed that Waterhouse didn't get rubbed out for continually ramming that Eagles guy head into the ground in last years prelim final.

doggies4eva wrote:I'm amazed that Waterhouse didn't get rubbed out for continually ramming that Eagles guy head into the ground in last years prelim final.

So am I. I don't want the SANFL to go how the AFL tribunal gives out anything to anyone, but I wouldn't want them to go totally opposite, either.