Page 1 of 3
Dogs vs Bays scores
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:32 pmby Jimmy
early 1st qtr
Bays 3.0
Dogs 0.1
ill give scores every now and then...
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:51 pmby Jimmy
end of 1st qtr
Bays 6 goals
Dogs 2.2 i think...
anyway, bays out to a flyer...
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:56 pmby therisingblues
Nice work Jimmy. I got a busy day here, if you keep posting every now and then it makes pretty exciting reading when I get the chance to look at it. Sort of like watching a "text replay", and I get to see how the game evolved. Much appreciated!
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:02 pmby Jimmy
Bays 9.1
Dogs 2.5
wtf is going on...
bays pumping em...mcconnell is killing em
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:03 pmby Jimmy
theri, no worries mate....probably every 5-6 mins or so...
im listening to it while i have a go at NBA LIVE 05
but the bays are just, quote smithy 'running away with it'
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:13 pmby Jimmy
point to the tigers
had all the play and should be more in front
9.5
2.5
42 points the margin
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:22 pmby Jimmy
bays 10 6
dogs 2 5
dogs havent scored this qtr...
a gowans just gave away a 25 and mcconnell puts it thru...you can hear the jeers for the prick now lol!!!!!!!!
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:27 pmby am Bays
Jimmy wrote:bays 10 6
dogs 2 5
dogs havent scored this qtr...
a gowans just gave away a 25 and mcconnell puts it thru...you can hear the jeers for the prick now lol!!!!!!!!
WTF is going on, C'mon Boys, Don't let up now...we need another 70 mins of this.
The Snouts know talent when we picked McConnell as our sponsored player....Not a bad replacement for Butch on the half back flank...
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:39 pmby Jimmy
half time
10.6
3.6
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 3:01 pmby Jimmy
tigers lead by 10 goals
13 to 3
they are just pumping em....
too much pressure, mcconnell, douglas, rogers being mentioned a bit...
point to the dogs
13.7
3.6
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 3:20 pmby sturt1
Who knows the bays could break their all time record which they have over the same team
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 3:20 pmby Jimmy
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 3:21 pmby Jimmy
have i gone back to the 75 or something????
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 3:40 pmby am Bays
Jimmy, you aren't having a lend of me are you, it is cruel joke if you are having a lend of this Bays supporter.......
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 3:43 pmby Jimmy
******* bizarro world
bays 20.13 133
dogs 6.9 45
love to see them get up by a ton
:D
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 3:44 pmby Jimmy
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Jimmy, you aren't having a lend of me are you, it is cruel joke if you are having a lend of this Bays supporter.......
you couldnt write this shit mate
:D
its as real as pams tits are fake
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 4:18 pmby scott
Good god!
How much time is left?
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 4:26 pmby Jimmy
its over...they won by 90+ points
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:19 pmby Dogwatcher
Highly peeved off.
Discipline an issue.
As was experience, only nine (I think) of last year's premiership players in side.
Skills poor.
Lack of mobility in forward line (Schell out, Cowans struggling with fitness) - although Wilson's move there late in the game looked promising.
And just occasionally the umpiring was very ordinary - but we promoted that problem by looking for trouble and being indisciplined.
Well done Bays. Got us while we were down, held us there and took advantage of us. Good result for you.
Hmmm, just realised that the above par sounded like a description of rape, but it wasn't cos we consented to you screwing us by being so uncompetitive.
Posted:
Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:22 pmby CENTURION
DOH!