SA Footy

i just had a look at (our sponsors) sportsbets premiership market & their market says that north will miss & port will make it (i'm inclined to agree with them although i can see norwood missing as well especially if they lost this week)

glenelg $2.50
sturt $2.50
cent $5.00
PORT $13.00
norwd $17.00
NORTH $21.00
eagles $31.00

start discussing folks !!!

Gambling is a sin and you are all going to hell....

$5 must be the longest Central has been in years. Very good value in my eyes.

Pseudo wrote:$5 must be the longest Central has been in years. Very good value in my eyes.

I was thinking the same thing Pseudo, might put $100 on them I reckon...

And then go to hell according to Tassie...

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Gambling is a sin and you are all going to hell....

where or when was it a sin ? & don't look me up when you get there

If/when port make the finals they will have available ....Surjan, Maric, Wilson, and probably Burgoyne and Johncock . So much for not relying on AFL players

LBT wrote:If/when port make the finals they will have available ....Surjan, Maric, Wilson, and probably Burgoyne and Johncock . So much for not relying on AFL players

Serious question: are the AFL clubs obliged to make eligible players available for the finals? Thinking in particular of someone like Maric, who hasn't played for the Maggies since early May, would probably be viewed as a first-22 Crow nowadays and may just want to join in mad Monday and finish the season with the rest of the lads.

SimonH wrote:

LBT wrote:If/when port make the finals they will have available ....Surjan, Maric, Wilson, and probably Burgoyne and Johncock . So much for not relying on AFL players

Serious question: are the AFL clubs obliged to make eligible players available for the finals? Thinking in particular of someone like Maric, who hasn't played for the Maggies since early May, would probably be viewed as a first-22 Crow nowadays and may just want to join in mad Monday and finish the season with the rest of the lads.

Thats probably true, Port and the crows may elect to hold their players back as they have done in the past like Westoff last year and Perrie in North finals campaigns.

SimonH wrote:

LBT wrote:If/when port make the finals they will have available ....Surjan, Maric, Wilson, and probably Burgoyne and Johncock . So much for not relying on AFL players

Serious question: are the AFL clubs obliged to make eligible players available for the finals? Thinking in particular of someone like Maric, who hasn't played for the Maggies since early May, would probably be viewed as a first-22 Crow nowadays and may just want to join in mad Monday and finish the season with the rest of the lads.

If the Cows are out early though and Maric has a choice between mad monday/sunday or whenever it all kicks off and playing a final, what do you think he'd rather pick?

I'd be playing footy.

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Gambling is a sin and you are all going to hell....

the worlds best poker player is a devoit catholic....nothing in the bible about gambling

anyone would think its illegal

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Gambling is a sin and you are all going to hell....

Do they have gambling in hell?

Tassie Blues wrote:

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Gambling is a sin and you are all going to hell....

Do they have gambling in hell?

i bet they do

Dutchy wrote:

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Gambling is a sin and you are all going to hell....

the worlds best poker player is a devoit catholic....nothing in the bible about gambling

anyone would think its illegal

Tigers figthing - I like it

Blue Boy wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Gambling is a sin and you are all going to hell....

the worlds best poker player is a devoit catholic....nothing in the bible about gambling

anyone would think its illegal

Tigers figthing - I like it

what is a FIGTHING ? i've heard of 'figmal' & a 'fig leaf' but i don't know what a 'fig thing' is

bayman wrote:

Blue Boy wrote:Tigers figthing - I like it

what is a FIGTHING ? i've heard of 'figmal' & a 'fig leaf' but i don't know what a 'fig thing' is

Maybe that's the thing which is typically obscured by a well-placed fig leaf

Tassie Blues wrote:

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Gambling is a sin and you are all going to hell....

Do they have gambling in hell?

Yep, and you always lose in the end just like here!

Pseudo wrote:$5 must be the longest Central has been in years. Very good value in my eyes.

Out to about $8 at some point in 2005.

well as we get to the last round the bookies got north right but saturdays clash of port v wwt's will determine whether they are right with port

bayman wrote:well as we get to the last round the bookies got north right but saturdays clash of port v wwt's will determine whether they are right with port

Bayman are WWT still $31 ? might be a nice bet if I did bet that is

Mickyj wrote:

bayman wrote:well as we get to the last round the bookies got north right but saturdays clash of port v wwt's will determine whether they are right with port

Bayman are WWT still $31 ? might be a nice bet if I did bet that is

sportsbet's premiership odds (1/9/08)

sturt evens
glenelg 2/1
central 11/4
port 14/1
wwt 20/1
norwd 20/1

i'd suggest mickyj that you'd get better odds going all up everyweek if indeed they went top