Page 1 of 2

SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:11 am
by maxyoz
Are footy threads on SANFL Board footy related enough?

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:18 am
by whatever
this is the first thread I have seen that is not footy related.

so I would normally say yes.

I am actually finding this site very good as it has imformation and some very good light hearted banter. The other great thing is there appears to be a lack of trolls.

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:19 am
by pipers
whatever wrote:The other great thing is there appears to be a lack of trolls.


Yes, trolls are discouraged.


I know I am.

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:23 am
by Rushby Hinds
Just don't mention other posters.


But you can degrade media personalities.


But what if a media personality is another poster?


Oh, the confusion.

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:26 am
by maxyoz
Aah - so footy threads are footy related enough except threads that ask if they are footy related.

Logical to me.

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:27 am
by barry_watson
whats your point maxyoz

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:29 am
by pipers
Rushby Hinds wrote:Oh, the confusion.


And it's fair game to call someone fat until they have retired, but once they hang up their boots they're off limits...

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:30 am
by Dogwatcher
Rushby Hinds wrote:Just don't mention other posters.


But you can degrade media personalities.


But what if a media personality is another poster?


Oh, the confusion.


Do you have a solution sir?

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:36 am
by maxyoz
barry_watson wrote:whats your point maxyoz


Nothing Barry, that's the whole point, pointless posting about non footy related threads on a footy related thread regarding footy relatedness.

And how is my 3rd cousin, anyway?

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:40 am
by Ecky
Someone had better quickly think up a good segue to make this thread more footy related, or it will go straight to the bin once King Wedgie hears about it!

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:46 am
by am Bays
Ok Punters, this is something that has been tossed around before and raised on this board, should we have sub forum to SANFL board for banter and more humerous threads (abuse would not be tolerated)?

One of the aims of this site is to give people the place to discuss SANFL footy in a serious manner hence why certain threads do get canned as they promote free for all slanging matches.

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:50 am
by MightyEagles
So, who do people think will win on the weekend? The bye? :lol:

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:27 am
by Pseudo
Is "SANFL threads" what is worn by a state player? :-k

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:40 am
by pipers
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:One of the aims of this site is to give people the place to discuss SANFL footy in a serious manner hence why certain threads do get canned as they promote free for all slanging matches.


With all due respect TM, the fact that people discuss footy so seriously is the primary reason that threads descend into anarchy!

That is our point.

Lighten the f*ck up people.

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:42 am
by Wedgie
King Wedgie has a nice ring to it but Im more of a fan of Emperor Wedgie as the 'evil Emporer' has a nice ing to it. ;)

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:54 am
by smithy
Wedgie wrote:King Wedgie has a nice ring to it but Im more of a fan of Emperor Wedgie as the 'evil Emporer' has a nice ing to it. ;)



WEDGIE:

When we were an Empire we were run by an emperor.
When we were a kingdom we were run by kings.
Now that we are a country we are run by ............


:)

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:57 am
by Pseudo
smithy wrote:
Wedgie wrote:King Wedgie has a nice ring to it but Im more of a fan of Emperor Wedgie as the 'evil Emporer' has a nice ing to it. ;)



WEDGIE:

When we were an Empire we were run by an emperor.
When we were a kingdom we were run by kings.
Now that we are a country we are run by ............


:)


But this is a board. Is it run by boors?

And I've always thought of Wedgie as more of a "grand poobah" than an emperor :lol:

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:57 am
by sturtpeter
Appropriate People :wink:

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:00 pm
by Big Phil
smithy wrote:
Wedgie wrote:King Wedgie has a nice ring to it but Im more of a fan of Emperor Wedgie as the 'evil Emporer' has a nice ing to it. ;)



WEDGIE:

When we were an Empire we were run by an emperer.
When we were a kingdom we were run by kings.
Now that we are a country we are run by ............


:)


I don't get it Smithy !!?? :-k

Our country is ran by our Prime Minister - Kevin Rudd :-s

Oh, hang on a minute... :shock:

Ahhh... Now I get it... We are run by a C**T !!! ?? :lol:

Nice one Smithy, well done =D> :lol: =D>

Re: SANFL Threads

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:00 pm
by Pseudo
fatalberton wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:One of the aims of this site is to give people the place to discuss SANFL footy in a serious manner hence why certain threads do get canned as they promote free for all slanging matches.


With all due respect TM, the fact that people discuss footy so seriously is the primary reason that threads descend into anarchy!

That is our point.

Lighten the f*ck up people.


As a Glenelg supporter, I require a certain amount of levity on these threads. It was once necessary to help me cope with the fact that my team was sh!t. Now it is necessary to help me cope with the fact that Glenelg is top, and therefore the foundation stones upon which my reality has been built have crumbled away! :lol: