Is it Rubbers? Is it the Victorians? Is it Chandler?
Is it too early?
Is Mickan the real deal?
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
pipers - League Bench Warmer
-
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:35 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 1 time
- Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran
Re: Is Mickan the real deal?
by Rushby Hinds » Mon May 19, 2008 11:19 pm
fatalberton wrote:Is it Rubbers? Is it the Victorians? Is it Chandler?
Is it too early?
I wish your Dad had worn a Rubber.
P.S. He's a top bloke actually.
But I still do.
He's still my hero even if he is a little bit crap.
-
Rushby Hinds - League - Best 21
-
- Posts: 1520
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:40 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Is Mickan the real deal?
by pipers » Mon May 19, 2008 11:24 pm
Rushby Hinds wrote:I wish your Dad had worn a Rubber.
P.S. He's a top bloke actually.
But I still do.
But then you would never have met him.
Fatalberton - bringing people together since 1973.
Just ask polks.
"loyalty is dead"
Re: Is Mickan the real deal?
by am Bays » Mon May 19, 2008 11:27 pm
No but he is having a renaisance (sp?? 
) ...
) ...Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
Re: Is Mickan the real deal?
by therisingblues » Tue May 20, 2008 1:30 am
fatalberton wrote:Is it Rubbers? Is it the Victorians? Is it Chandler?
Is it too early?
Is it mum and dad?
Is it a cockatoo?
Hey true blue!
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
-
therisingblues - Coach
-
- Posts: 6190
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
- Location: Fukuoka
- Has liked: 369 times
- Been liked: 514 times
- Grassroots Team: Hope Valley
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Football SANFL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: am Bays and 16 guests
Advertisements by Advertisement Management