Name your most hated players in the league

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Name your most hated players in the league

Postby dash61 » Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:56 pm

Name your club of support
Name your three most hated players
Name your 3 players you'd welcome to your club

Mine : Westies

Mosted Hated:
1) Gowans Brothers (Count them as one)
2) Brett Backwell
3) Damian Squire

Love To Have
1) Gowans Brothers (Count them as one) (Doggies)
2) Brett Backwell (Gay Bays)
3) Alleway (Norths) Or Adam Fisher (Gay Bays)
Last edited by dash61 on Wed Mar 22, 2006 7:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
dash61
 

Postby sydney-dog » Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:19 pm

I still say the Stringer Brothers and Scotty Salisbury
sydney-dog
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby sturt1 » Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:24 pm

I dont hate this guy but I get the impression that alot of sanfl (minus roosters) fans hate him - Chris Ladhams. I would love to him at Sturt.
But it was more than a victory for Greece. It was a stirring example to free people throughout the world of what a few brave men can accomplish once they refuse to submit to tyranny.
sturt1
Under 18s
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:29 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby zipzap » Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:34 pm

sturt1 wrote:I dont hate this guy but I get the impression that alot of sanfl (minus roosters) fans hate him - Chris Ladhams. I would love to him at Sturt.


Ooh, I like Blankety Blanks.

Cyril said, "Chris Ladhams...I would love to BLANK him at Sturt".

Answers on a postcard...
"A no vote from any club means there is some sort of risk involved in our entry into the competition not working," Steven Trigg.
User avatar
zipzap
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Bluebird Bakery
Has liked: 248 times
Been liked: 39 times

Postby Rik E Boy » Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:39 am

zipzap wrote:
sturt1 wrote:I dont hate this guy but I get the impression that alot of sanfl (minus roosters) fans hate him - Chris Ladhams. I would love to him at Sturt.


Ooh, I like Blankety Blanks.

Cyril said, "Chris Ladhams...I would love to BLANK him at Sturt".

Answers on a postcard...


Back in your box, Peter the Phantom Puller ****. :wink:

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28571
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1885 times

Postby bloodsucker » Fri Mar 24, 2006 11:37 am

sydney-dog wrote:I still say the Stringer Brothers and Scotty Salisbury


Yep, pricks of the highest order.
bloodsucker
 

Postby Booney » Fri Mar 24, 2006 11:42 am

Michael Aish from here to the grave.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61591
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8186 times
Been liked: 11916 times

Postby MST » Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:59 pm

Support: Sturt

Three 'disliked' players:
S. Bamford (pack skirter)
V. Rugolo (overweight/overrated)
B. Backwell (overrated. Another player who never troubles the laundry lady)

Three 'if only they were double blue' players:
J. Clayton
T. Inkster
P. Scoullar
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Rik E Boy » Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:21 pm

S Carter
W Mahoney
D Leys

Magpie boofheads all. At least Grave Danger could actually play.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28571
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1885 times

Postby doggies4eva » Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:24 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:S Carter
W Mahoney
D Leys

Magpie boofheads all. At least Grave Danger could actually play.

regards,

REB


I was wondering when someone was going to mention Grave Danger. He might have been able to play but was usually too busy going the biffo.

Russell Ebert also used to give me the shits - come on umpie they weren't legal handballs :evil:

And for number three?? Maybe Rick Davies for his amazing ability to con the umpire into getting frees in front of goal. No one else gets them there :x
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

To REB

Postby Lunchcutter » Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:28 pm

[quote="Rik E Boy"]S Carter
W Mahoney
D Leys

Magpie boofheads all. At least Grave Danger could actually play.

regards,

REB[/quote]


Pretty sure that was B Leys (Bryan)
User avatar
Lunchcutter
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Salisbury
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Postby blueandwhite » Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:17 pm

Without doubt in the past David Granger. He is now where he should have been years ago. I also have no respect for the club who employed him and also encouraged him to act in a manner that was damaging to the public profile of the game.

As for todays players

1. definitely Damien Squire. absolute sheep dog, runs forward of the ball, sure has skills and speed but rarely wins a contested possesion.
2. Gowans Bros inc.
3.Culpitt.- will be interesting to see how he is recieved at the bay where he was a hero and now will be a villain.
Tiocfaidh ár Lá
User avatar
blueandwhite
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Cloney Harp
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 219 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Postby Booney » Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:29 pm

doggies4eva wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:S Carter
W Mahoney
D Leys

Magpie boofheads all. At least Grave Danger could actually play.

regards,

REB


I was wondering when someone was going to mention Grave Danger. He might have been able to play but was usually too busy going the biffo.

Russell Ebert also used to give me the shits - come on umpie they weren't legal handballs :evil: .

And for number three?? Maybe Rick Davies for his amazing ability to con the umpire into getting frees in front of goal. No one else gets them there :x


No one should evermention Russell Ebert in a negative way.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61591
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8186 times
Been liked: 11916 times

Postby am Bays » Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:37 pm

Booney wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:S Carter
W Mahoney
D Leys

Magpie boofheads all. At least Grave Danger could actually play.

regards,

REB


I was wondering when someone was going to mention Grave Danger. He might have been able to play but was usually too busy going the biffo.

Russell Ebert also used to give me the shits - come on umpie they weren't legal handballs :evil: .

And for number three?? Maybe Rick Davies for his amazing ability to con the umpire into getting frees in front of goal. No one else gets them there :x


No one should evermention Russell Ebert in a negative way.


Except Bruce Webber, "alledgedly" at Russell's house September 1987, "Russell you have nothing to worry about [you will be our coach next year]"....two weeks later.....

All alledged of course.......
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19724
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2122 times

Postby Booney » Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:40 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
Booney wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:S Carter
W Mahoney
D Leys

Magpie boofheads all. At least Grave Danger could actually play.

regards,

REB


I was wondering when someone was going to mention Grave Danger. He might have been able to play but was usually too busy going the biffo.

Russell Ebert also used to give me the shits - come on umpie they weren't legal handballs :evil: .

And for number three?? Maybe Rick Davies for his amazing ability to con the umpire into getting frees in front of goal. No one else gets them there :x


No one should evermention Russell Ebert in a negative way.


Except Bruce Webber, "alledgedly" at Russell's house September 1987, "Russell you have nothing to worry about [you will be our coach next year]"....two weeks later.....

All alledged of course.......


No one should ever mention Bruce Webber in a negative wa.................*ahem*,lets all move forward. :wink:
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61591
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8186 times
Been liked: 11916 times

Re: To REB

Postby Rik E Boy » Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:46 pm

Lunchcutter wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:S Carter
W Mahoney
D Leys

Magpie boofheads all. At least Grave Danger could actually play.

regards,

REB



Pretty sure that was B Leys (Bryan)


LOL. Yep, B Leys, D Leys is a guy I work with DOH :oops:

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28571
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1885 times

Postby Blue Boy » Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:58 pm

[quote="blueandwhite"]
1. definitely Damien Squire. absolute sheep dog, runs forward of the ball, sure has skills and speed but rarely wins a contested possesion.

Are you making this judgement on games against the panthers in which of late Sturt have won most of - or have you seen him play any other games.

I have seen him win the ball many times.

Sturts game plan is some one to win the ball and then every one run forward with handball until we can deliver it clearly to a forward. So in games against South that is probably all you see cause you guys dont get the ball.

And yes before any one has a crack Sturt's game plan does struggle against some teams. Especially against the Eagles - just cant beat em ever.
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Postby doggies4eva » Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:01 pm

Blue Boy wrote:
blueandwhite wrote:1. definitely Damien Squire. absolute sheep dog, runs forward of the ball, sure has skills and speed but rarely wins a contested possesion.

Are you making this judgement on games against the panthers in which of late Sturt have won most of - or have you seen him play any other games.

I have seen him win the ball many times.

Sturts game plan is some one to win the ball and then every one run forward with handball until we can deliver it clearly to a forward. So in games against South that is probably all you see cause you guys dont get the ball.

And yes before any one has a crack Sturt's game plan does struggle against some teams. Especially against the Eagles - just cant beat em ever.


Or us at Unley :lol:
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby MST » Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:35 pm

[quote="blueandwhite"]Without doubt in the past David Granger. He is now where he should have been years ago. I also have no respect for the club who employed him and also encouraged him to act in a manner that was damaging to the public profile of the game.

As for todays players

1. definitely Damien Squire. absolute sheep dog, runs forward of the ball, sure has skills and speed but rarely wins a contested possesion.


You must be having a laugh 'bluey'. Squire, as well as having the most exquisite skills in the competition, finds the footy with a knack and football smarts that precious few players have. He never gets caught with the ball and picks up many of his touches in heavy traffic rather than 'forward of the ball' as you foolishly suggest. He is a supremely talented player but never in his career has he carried the tag of being selfish or lairy. He does the little things well also and is one of the best when it comes to holding the player in a tackle and applying a block or smother.
Each of us is entitled to an opinion and whether right or wrong I offered mine earlier.

BUT, to suggest D. Squire is a forward running player who accrues cheap touches is plain wrong.

Were you not at Noarlunga last year when he had 40+ touches and kicked three goals in five third quarter minutes??????

PURE GENIUS.
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby drebin » Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:40 pm

MST wrote:Support: Sturt

Three 'disliked' players:
S. Bamford (pack skirter)
V. Rugolo (overweight/overrated)
B. Backwell (overrated. Another player who never troubles the laundry lady)

Three 'if only they were double blue' players:
J. Clayton
T. Inkster
P. Scoullar


Well I could take you task about your assessment of Bamford MST. Re Squire, he is not exactly an in an under type either - he is a creative runner as he plays on the ball and iss expected to be attacking and creative. Bamford is primarily a wingman but over the past year he has played more on the ball in bursts off the bench and has put his body (albeit a thin one!) on the line and has showed a tougher side to him and gets plenty of hard balls as well as beign attacking and creative. So be careful about your assessments of players before you stick it up others - remember everyone has a different view point of certain players.
drebin
 

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |