SA Footy • View topic - Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

by **sturtpeter** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:33 pm

I am tired to death of seing the SANFL's best FF totally unfairly played against.

Will this ensure a new interpretation or will the current panel be more assertive?

by **once_were_warriors** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:38 pm

Ahh blow it out your asz

by **bayman** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:38 pm

you have just proved you are an idiot, he gets frees sometimes & other times he gives them away, his problem is when he gives them away HE mouths off & gives away 25 metre penalties & is the worst offender at doing this in the league

by **Wedgie** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:44 pm

once_were_warriors wrote:Ahh blow it out your asz

Very appropriate! :lol:

by **bulldogproud** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:44 pm

Pete, the best full forward in the State is actually not playing much at full forward any more due to the constant attention which he received - Daniel Schell. He proved today just how good a forward he is by kicking four goals in fifteen minutes when moved to the forward line in the third quarter. Full forwards unfortunately just have to deal with the attention they receive.
Cheers

by **sturtpeter** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:47 pm

Wedgie and Chrissy!

He gets crucified week in week out.

A now retired SANFL player allegedly provoked him at Oval Avenue two years ago.

I think Brant's the best thing since sliced bread.

Go U Premiers!

by **sturtpeter** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:48 pm

P.S.

Daniel's a mate of mine.

Why don't the Doggies reward him with an offensive role?

Go Sturt!

by **bulldogproud** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:49 pm

Pete, all forwards seem to be crucified each week. I don't think that Brant is an orphan in that regard. That is all I am saying.

Cheers

by **Jardog** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:51 pm

You must be joking Sturtpeter,half of his goals were from free kicks last season.

by **gadj1976** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:52 pm

SP

You're an embarrassment to the club, go away!

by **SnappyTom** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:53 pm

sturtpeter wrote:P.S.

Daniel's a mate of mine.

Why don't the Doggies reward him with an offensive role?

Go Sturt!

Schell asked to move down back, for career longevity.
If he had stayed in the forward line at the start of 2007 he'ds be a spent force by now.

It's well known we structure our game around a solid back 6. He is missed when he moves up forward, but his effort in the third quarter today was worth the price of admission. I like McConnell too, he's a great goal sneek, and gets under the guard well... ST...

by **sturtpeter** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:55 pm

Tom!

I agree.
Hope you are well.
as far as the inappropriate poster, Get a life.

Thanks!

by **mighty_tiger_79** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:56 pm

sturtpeter wrote:Tom!

I agree.
Hope you are well.
as far as the inappropriate poster, Get a life.Thanks!

talking to yourself now SP

by **bulldogproud** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:57 pm

Pete, as Snappy said Schelly does not want to play up forward. It was his call and he was fed up with being constantly 'attended to' just in the way you say Brant is.

Cheers

by **SnappyTom** » Sun May 04, 2008 8:57 pm

sturtpeter wrote:Tom!

I agree.
Hope you are well.
as far as the inappropriate poster, Get a life.

Thanks!

I'll catch up with you at the Round 23 clash at The Ponderosa, SP.
Big Bad Brant will be kept goal-less on that night, no doubt scragged and manhandled* by Schell... :shock:

2008 finds me well...

by **Punk Rooster** » Sun May 04, 2008 9:00 pm

sturtpeter wrote:Go U Premiers!

you barrack for Geelong & Centrals?

by **GWW** » Sun May 04, 2008 9:08 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
sturtpeter wrote:Go U Premiers!

you barrack for Geelong & Centrals?

No he's just a fan of Mike Rann.

by **southee** » Sun May 04, 2008 9:24 pm

Sturt supporters :roll:

by **Dirko** » Sun May 04, 2008 9:29 pm

WTF ? In the games I've seen Chambo (v Glenelg) he's usually kicked a few, Sammy has had him under control though, and yep...he's given a few frees away, yapped at the Umpire & thanks mate that'll be 25...

Just to think if his old man used protection...there would be no Chambo :lol:

by **woodwt** » Sun May 04, 2008 9:41 pm

Oh please

Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Who is online

Around the place

Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect

Around the place

Join us