Norwood v South review

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Norwood v South review

Postby am Bays » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:37 pm

Okay Final score courtesy of JAS

JAS wrote:Nwd 11-12-78
Sth 11-12-78

Goals
Nwd...Aish x 4, Donahue x 3, Walker x 3, Trotter x 1
Sth....Otten x 4, Warren x 3, Torney, Bachman, Ellis x 1 each...and I missed one sorry

Quarters
Nwd...2-3...8-6...11-9...11-12-78
Sth....2-5...3-7....8-7....11-12-78

Regards
JAS


Post away your thoughts, I'm tipping this will be a tame thread compared to the same discussion on Redleg Talk. Don't think too many of the punters on it will be happy with blowing a seven goal lead.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19769
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Round 5 Anzac Evening Norwood vs South @ Coopers

Postby therisingblues » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:41 pm

Crowd: 2,873
Both sides finished on 11-12-78
1980 Tassie Medallist wrote:BIG game for South this one. Lose and the respect they have earnt following their 3-0 start will evaporate as other sides will believe it was just an apparition and the "real" South has returned.

Win here and they are 4-1 and setting themselves up for a shot at the finals.


This, the last post of the preview thread pretty well sums up South's predicament.
But what do make of option "C"?
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby therisingblues » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:43 pm

Wow, that was bloody fast whoever shifted my topic into a post onto this thread! :lol:
Well done! :D
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby am Bays » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:44 pm

*pffff - spins gun on finger and then puts it back into the holster* :wink:
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19769
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby Royal City » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:50 pm

Doh!!! had $20 on South at $2.30.

Is it just a matter of the Eagles knocking the panthers out of the five.???
Royal City
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:12 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby brod » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:52 pm

Walker has to one, if not only positive to come from The Parade this season
User avatar
brod
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19195
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: Willaston
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 28 times

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby brod » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:53 pm

Add the form of Jesse Aish, but theres not much else
User avatar
brod
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19195
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: Willaston
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 28 times

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby therisingblues » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:53 pm

:lol: @ Tassie.

Yes, the Legs should be mighty p1ssed off that they let this one slip.
The Panthers on the other hand have achieved their biggest comeback to date. Pity for them they didn't capitalize on it, but that surely sounds a warning to other clubs that though the Panther may looked screwed, he will pounce as soon as you drop your gaurd,
The SMAC weather report on Parade said that the weather was woeful, so they made up that deficit in wet slippery conditions also if I understand correctly.
I think Jack has instilled character in to this team.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby bayman » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:57 pm

it would have to be the most amazing match i've seen in a long time, the first quarter south dominated & only led by 2 points at quarter time, then in the 2nd term it was norwoods turn to dominate especially when torney went off & looked good at times & terrible at other times & the same could be said of south & by half way through the 3rd term norwood had got to a 43 point lead & had kicked 8 unanswered goals, then late in the 3rd the tide turned again & south started to control basically the rest of the game, parry took 2 marks on the goal line in the last quarter which ultimately got them the draw, player of the future is taylor walker, i've seen him twice now & he is a class act with a great pair of hands
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby PhilH » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:59 pm

After 5 rounds, South will be in outright 2nd with a percentage approx 46, amazing.
User avatar
PhilH
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:04 am
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 163 times
Grassroots Team: Happy Valley

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby Sojourner » Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:06 am

Just got back in from the Parade!

Really enjoyed the game, thought we were gone for all money in the latter part of the second quarter, yet as has been the case in all our games bar the one against Sturt, we showed character and gritted our way back into it this time with a draw. The siren went as we were making another blast into our forward fifty, so another ten seconds and it could have been ours, yet there is always an "only if" in Footy I suppose!

South have much work to do to make sure that we can be a club that plays competitively week in and week out, yet I do feel that the Panthers are begining to really play out four quarters of football and the side does look fitter and stronger than last years side and the difference is quite noticable.

Aaron Kite played really well for Norwood and I wont be surprised if he gets his go with the Crows sooner rather than later!

Brickbats however to some idiot from Norwood who during the Anzac day ceremony and customary silence had to open his hole and yell "Norwood", which was really tacky and showed a massive amount of disrespect to not only the ANZAC legend but his own team that were observing the silence along with everyone else, still there are always going to be d1ckheads involved at any SANFL club attempting to ruin it for everyone else I suppose!

Norwood won the reserves and played quite a high standard of game in doing so. For South I felt that Curtis Perrey played a really good game and made a good case for his inclusion in the league side!

Would be interesting to have been in the rooms afterwards, its always an interesting feeling when the result is a draw, yet considering that we did make up a seven goal deficit I would suspect that John Cahill would be relitivley pleased with the result, especially that we got out of a loss by a goal kicked in the last minute or so!
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby Matt the Panther » Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:12 am

What a bizarre game.

Should have been further up at 1/4 time, Norwood were woeful at the beginning.
South completely controlled the play until we hit our forward line.
Second quarter, got shat on.
Third quarter hit our straps again, and finally scrounged for a draw in the last.

That last few seconds was horrible.
Was on my feet screaming "HHHAAAANNNDDDBBBYYY" - we finally kicked it to him... he's wobbling all over the place, groggy as all hell, ball is in mid air, he looks a sure bet to mark it.... and.... *siren*.

Can never be happy with a draw, but given our abysmal percentage, that extra point might prove pretty handy down the track.

Strange feeling... think our supporters have a hell of a lot more to be happy about than Norwood's.
Matt the Panther
Member
 
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:29 pm
Location: London
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby NFC » Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:21 am

brod wrote:Add the form of Jesse Aish, but theres not much else

Aish should never leave the forward fifty. Ever.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby heater31 » Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:24 am

I too have just returned home and how many more rabbits does Jack have in his hat left? Legs fans seem to be irate that the men in white decided to have a shocker. South deserved to be further in front at the first change but Norwood played the much better footy in the 2nd. The Panthers worked their way back into it in the 3rd and this inspired me to trudge out to their huddle at the last change. Jack and the Coaching staff were fairly laid back with their address and seemed to not be panicking. The supporters were showing real confidence and the players although didn't get the choccies didn't disappoint.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16680
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 533 times
Been liked: 1292 times

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby saintal » Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:37 am

30 minutes of garbage footy cost us this one. Credit to the boys in fighting back like they did. The second year in a row South have had a draw on anzac weekend :shock:

Like last week, absolutely no defensive pressure inside our forward 50. Really need to work on this. Also much too Warren focused. Zorzi wore him like a glove for most of the night. Ellis needs to presenting more.

A few more seconds and we might have pinched it. :?

Handby played a great game. Boyd good again, as were Baird, Otten, Parry. Liked the look of Kite for the legs. Aish and Zorzi are all class.

Any word on Torney?

One positive of getting a draw is that it will most likely make our % irrelevant.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
User avatar
saintal
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5822
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 464 times

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby UKPanther » Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:46 am

Was stuck in meetings during pretty much the whole match and was very pleased to get a final text from JAS saying it was a draw. Whilst I would prefer a win I am happy to take a draw in these circumstances. I don't think I have ever seen a South side come from 43 points down in the 3rd quarter to get someting out of the game. And who knows, the draw may come in handy at some point. Whilst our second quarter must have been pretty average it is a good sign to see the side tough it out and fight to the end....if we keep doing that then we will continue to improve and hopefully win some more games....

UKP :D :D
UKPanther
Under 16s
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 3:44 am
Location: Birmingham, UK
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby bayman » Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am

Royal City wrote:Doh!!! had $20 on South at $2.30.

Is it just a matter of the Eagles knocking the panthers out of the five.???



oh well you'll get $11.50 back
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby NFC » Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:25 am

Pretty shattered to be honest, how on earth we let that game slip is beyond me. We were totally DOMINANT in the second quarter and for 10 minutes of the third. We got out by 6 or 7 goals, and we still let them come back. They kicked about 2 or 3 goals late in the third term and when I looked at the scoreboard and it read that we were only 3 goals ahead I was shocked. We seemed to let them back in the game as our options dried up across the ground and South started winning every contested ball. Andy Otten destroyed us, kicking 4 goals as well as having 25 odd possessions.

The sad reality is that if the game had gone on for another minute South would've won as they were all over Norwood.

A draw isn't good enough.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby Scoop » Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:33 am

The SMAC weather report on Parade said that the weather was woeful, so they made up that deficit in wet slippery conditions also if I understand correctly.


The weather was perfect. About 2 drops of sprinkling moisture during the reserves and nothing during the league match. Not a breath of wind, neither end favoured. Perfect conditions for night football.

While a poor standard of skill on display from both sides the final quarter certainly got everyone interested and vocal. From a "football was the winner" point of view probably a fair result as both sides created plenty of opportunities but took advantage of few of them.
Insanity Multimedia and Nick Hook Photography
User avatar
Scoop
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:10 pm
Location: Henley Beach South
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Norwood v South review

Postby smac » Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:52 am

Scoop wrote:
The SMAC weather report on Parade said that the weather was woeful, so they made up that deficit in wet slippery conditions also if I understand correctly.


The weather was perfect. About 2 drops of sprinkling moisture during the reserves and nothing during the league match. Not a breath of wind, neither end favoured. Perfect conditions for night football.

While a poor standard of skill on display from both sides the final quarter certainly got everyone interested and vocal. From a "football was the winner" point of view probably a fair result as both sides created plenty of opportunities but took advantage of few of them.

That's stunning info about the weather - it rained at my place for at least two thirds of the match duration and I'm only a few km's from the Parade.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: am Bays and 16 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |