ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

All discussions to do with the SANFL

ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby smac » Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:26 pm

What a great day! Although I'm sure the final result helped that along...

Dogs were a little up and down, but did enough to ensure the win and were the better team on the day.

Will drink some more tonight and think of some best players and a match review to post later.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby Dog_ger » Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:34 pm

A Truly great ANZAC DAY clash.

Turn up the volume guys.

http://www.anzacday.org.au/education/tff/images/last_post.wav
Smile :)

It's only Money $$$ :)

What is happening to our SANFL guys...
User avatar
Dog_ger
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Salisbury Downs
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 19 times

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby MightyEagles » Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:01 pm

Wasn't a too bad of a game. Umpires were a little poor in the 3rd, but set up what could have been a even closer finish.
Reserves was a good game.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby Apachebulldog » Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:24 pm

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!

Three goals to North in the third quarter from bullshit frees could of cost the Doggies the win, however they rallied in the last quarter and hung in for a very nice win !!!!!!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby am Bays » Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:37 pm

Bull shit frees? pfft didn't look bull shit on TV and why wasn't Slade penalised for calling the boundary umpire a f***ing cheat twice (once you'd let go but twice??? especially when it was so audible it wasn't funny) when he tried a blind turn to keep the ball in play.

If the umpire had clamped down on Slade then maybe he would have kept his mouth shut in the 3rd qtr when he gave away the two 25 m penalties....

Also in the last qtr when Gowan got the free kick and 25 m when Allaway came in late why wasn't it reversed when Faulkner charged Allaway???

After the goal from the two 50 s in the 3rd qtr the free kick count was 16 - 14 Centrals way so its not like North were getting a ride :roll: :roll: .
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19769
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby smac » Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:40 pm

Tas, you of all people should not think an even free kick count means umpires did a good job, or were consistent.

And Faulkner thought Allaway was an alleyway when he tried to run through him, honest mistake...
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby Ian » Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:41 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Bull s***t frees? pfft didn't look bull s***t on TV and why wasn't Slade penalised for calling the boundary umpire a f***ing cheat twice (once you'd let go but twice??? especially when it was so audible it wasn't funny) when he tried a blind turn to keep the ball in play.

If the umpire had clamped down on Slade then maybe he would have kept his mouth shut in the 3rd qtr when he gave away the two 25 m penalties....

Also in the last qtr when Gowan got the free kick and 25 m when Allaway came in late why wasn't it reversed when Faulkner charged Allaway???

After the goal from the two 50 s in the 3rd qtr the free kick count was 16 - 14 Centrals way so its not like North were getting a ride :roll: :roll: .
I'm glad a nuetral supporter said it
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:25 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 93 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby am Bays » Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:42 pm

smac wrote:Tas, you of all people should not think an even free kick count means umpires did a good job, or were consistent.



True, but watching the game at home with a few quiet West Ends nothing untoward about the umpiring IMO...
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19769
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby smac » Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:45 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
smac wrote:Tas, you of all people should not think an even free kick count means umpires did a good job, or were consistent.



True, but watching the game at home with a few quiet West Ends nothing untoward about the umpiring IMO...

Ha - you were pi55ed!

Seriously, I thought the umpires were OK. A few decisions were a little confusing, but take out the fact I was at the game and perhaps a couple (or more :wink: ) metres from the umpire, he may have seen some things better than I. A couple of replays still looked dodgy but I'm sure North supporters will say the same - all square at the end of the day.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby Ian » Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:51 pm

smac wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
smac wrote:Tas, you of all people should not think an even free kick count means umpires did a good job, or were consistent.



True, but watching the game at home with a few quiet West Ends nothing untoward about the umpiring IMO...

Ha - you were pi55ed!

Seriously, I thought the umpires were OK. A few decisions were a little confusing, but take out the fact I was at the game and perhaps a couple (or more :wink: ) metres from the umpire, he may have seen some things better than I. A couple of replays still looked dodgy but I'm sure North supporters will say the same - all square at the end of the day.


Yeh, there was a couple of baffling decisions (or non decisions) that went both ways, but the double 50m and the 25's in the 3rd, even a couple of Dogs fans near us admitted that they came from undisciplined stuff.

In the end a good game of footy, the best side on the day won, only low point was the comment made to an active soldier wearing his medals, he was asked something along the lines of was he proud of the killing of inocent people to get the medals, very poor form any day, on ANZAC day it was just plain disgraceful.
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:25 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 93 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby am Bays » Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:54 pm

smac wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
smac wrote:Tas, you of all people should not think an even free kick count means umpires did a good job, or were consistent.



True, but watching the game at home with a few quiet West Ends nothing untoward about the umpiring IMO...

Ha - you were pi55ed!



Hic!! :partyman: :drinkers: :tonqe: :drinkers: :drinkers:

then

:vom:
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19769
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby Apachebulldog » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:01 pm

Still some very baffling decisions against the Dogs .

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby smac » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:20 pm

Ian wrote:Yeh, there was a couple of baffling decisions (or non decisions) that went both ways, but the double 50m and the 25's in the 3rd, even a couple of Dogs fans near us admitted that they came from undisciplined stuff.

In the end a good game of footy, the best side on the day won, only low point was the comment made to an active soldier wearing his medals, he was asked something along the lines of was he proud of the killing of inocent people to get the medals, very poor form any day, on ANZAC day it was just plain disgraceful.

I agree with the thoughts about the 25's... We did the same against Sturt, too slow to learn that the umpires are cracking down on things - at least we did change today (eventually), unlike the Sturt game.

Your low point sounds like very poor form to me, I'm sure the person who said that would be much happier under Japanese rule, or worse.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby rod_rooster » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:34 pm

Ian wrote:only low point was the comment made to an active soldier wearing his medals, he was asked something along the lines of was he proud of the killing of inocent people to get the medals, very poor form any day, on ANZAC day it was just plain disgraceful.


That was a disgrace and the young chap who was drinking underage with a group of his mates was one of the biggest dickheads i have ever seen. In fact the whole group of them were a bunch of ungrateful rude knobs whose biggest achievement in life will be learning to walk on their hind legs.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby smac » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:36 pm

And now we should rise above and get back to footy discussions...
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby rod_rooster » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:39 pm

smac wrote:And now we should rise above and get back to footy discussions...


Agreed. Sorry to take things of track but those f*ckwits just really got to me.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby smac » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:40 pm

No need to apologise, I just don't want to still be discussing that on page 3. :wink:
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby redden whites » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:48 pm

I thought the umpires did a teriffic job today.The crowd calls are getting as bad as footy park Crows game though.Some people just have no idea.
User avatar
redden whites
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:09 am
Location: On the way to Bonnie Doon
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby locky801 » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:58 pm

Keep it quite short and simple, the best side in the comp won the game, their coach should be very pissed off with the end result as far as the winning margin was
Life is about moments, Create them
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 59098
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 4494 times
Been liked: 1451 times

Re: ANZAC Clash: Central V North Match Review

Postby mumbles » Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:27 pm

GO U DOGGIES
mumbles
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 4:29 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: am Bays and 17 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |