Page 1 of 3
weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:56 pm
by bayman
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:59 pm
by fester69
Only at Norwood. I guess the SANFL dont think Norwood fans will walk the streets smashing windows and vandalising cars after the game.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:22 pm
by Brucetiki
Obviously the SANFL thinks it's more of a Coopers Stadium issue than a Centrals v Norwood issue.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:38 pm
by Sam_goUUUdogs
fester69 wrote:Only at Norwood. I guess the SANFL dont think Norwood fans will walk the streets smashing windows and vandalising cars after the game.
Or they guess there wont be any problems as the trouble making Norwood supporters wont have the balls to travel to Elizabeth at night.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:36 am
by bulldogproud
It is because of the fact that the games at Norwood Oval are held on a Friday night and very close to a range of pubs. Too easy for people to travel there from work, be in pubs for a couple of hours before the game and so be inebriated enough to cause trouble at the matches. The solution could have been easy though: have the matches start at 6:30pm. Instead, Norwood are now confined to only having matches against teams that don't pull crowds at Norwood Oval.
Cheers
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:18 am
by smac
I have my doubts... Norwood respond the worst to our supporters out of all the clubs - I will be surprised if we aren't discussing an incident by the end of the weekend. Hope I am wrong though.
I reckon Dogs V Norwood on Saturday night at Elizabeth will only get one chance to get it right.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:26 am
by lesthemechanic
bulldogproud wrote:It is because of the fact that the games at Norwood Oval are held on a Friday night and very close to a range of pubs. Too easy for people to travel there from work, be in pubs for a couple of hours before the game and so be inebriated enough to cause trouble at the matches. The solution could have been easy though: have the matches start at 6:30pm. Instead, Norwood are now confined to only having matches against teams that don't pull crowds at Norwood Oval.
Cheers
Yes, there was only a few people at the Norwood /Sturt game 2 weeks ago. Other teams do have strong followings , not just the dogs while they are successful. I am sure most teams if they were riding the Bulldogs current wave of success would be bringing in the crowds too. It's human nature that some fans only attend when the team does well.
I do agree with the rest of your post though, could well be part of the reason for the past problems at those games, & starting earlier may have helped.
I always enjoy the night games at Norwood, always a really good atmosphere, something you don't really get at the night games at Adelaide or Elizabeth ( yet ? ).
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:40 am
by bulldogproud
Les, thanks for biting (slightly). I was only jesting about being confined to only hosting the low-drawing clubs.

Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:42 am
by bulldogproud
Norwood Oval will always bring in a great atmosphere due to the fact that supporters have to be up close to the action.
Cheers
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:48 am
by JK
I must admit, I thought the same and only found out earlier this week it's a night game, meaning I can't go due to prior engagement

(lol and not for the reason Sammy suggested).
Weather should bring this game closer again, and if our boys have any semblance of pride after last years debacle, it could actually be a tight game.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:52 am
by Sam_goUUUdogs
Constance_Perm wrote:I must admit, I thought the same and only found out earlier this week it's a night game, meaning I can't go due to prior engagement

(lol and not for the reason Sammy suggested).
damn, thought i almost had a bite
There is some truth in it though, games at the parade at night will always get a much more even split of supporters than those at Elizabeth, i guess for this reason the SANFL has decided, the larger the percentage of the crowd going for the same team means there is less chance of crowd trouble, which in theory makes sense, but we will see saturday night, hopefully they are right.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:16 pm
by Dirko
Just behave yourself sam_goyoudoggggggggggggggggssssssssssssssssssssssssss.
Happy Birthday too !
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:32 pm
by JK
Oh, happy birthday Sam, hope you have a great day (and Leg's thump your boys tomorrow

)
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:58 pm
by CENTURION
AND BRING SOME FLARES!
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:39 pm
by pipers
The problem isn't one of violence, it is one of lux.
It is so bloody dark at the Parade that people can't help but bump into each other.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:41 pm
by bulldogproud
Sammy matey, have a great b'day!!
Cheers.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 5:11 pm
by topsywaldron
smac wrote:Norwood respond the worst to our supporters out of all the clubs.
And here I was thinking Centrals fans hated cheap generalisations.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 5:16 pm
by Dogwatcher
That's an observation, not a generalisation.
If he'd called Norwood supporters a bunch of toffee nosed, late sipping, theatre attending poofs, that would be a generalisation.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 5:17 pm
by Dogwatcher
Not that that's how I'd personally call them that, but you get my drift.
Re: weren't they going to ban these games ?

Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:00 pm
by am Bays
fatalberton wrote:The problem isn't one of violence, it is one of lux.
Agreed is they used LUX instead of OMO, Drive or FAB their clothes would be brighter and they'd see each other more easily.
