SA Footy

Sturt 2-0 66%
South 2-0 52%
Glenelg 1-1 53%
North 1-0 51%
Central 1-1 46%
Norwood 1-1 45%
Port 0-2 47%
Eagles 0-2 44%
West 0-1 39%

Ive rounded a few %s down where they'd normally be rounded up so you get a better picture of who has a better perecentage between teams.

"South 2-0 65%"

I haven't done the Maths yet, but I don't think South should have such a high percentage just yet. Did you type a 6 instead of a 5 there Wedgie?

therisingblues wrote:"South 2-0 65%"

I haven't done the Maths yet, but I don't think South should have such a high percentage just yet. Did you type a 6 instead of a 5 there Wedgie?

I was thinking teh same thing a 14 pt win and a 5 pt win hardly make for a %age of 65

Back to the drawing board, brb.

Thanks guys, editted, should be 52% (I think).
By my calculations they have 202 for and 185 against.

202/387 = 52%

Must have been my Windows calculator that messed it up.

I just did the maths now, may be incorrect because I didn't use a calculator, but I got South for 202 against 185. Adds up to 387. So I got their percentage as 52.19%.
Edit, beat me to it Wedgie, but looks as though we have the same.

therisingblues wrote:I just did the maths now, may be incorrect because I didn't use a calculator, but I got South for 202 against 185. Adds up to 387. So I got their percentage as 52.19%.
Edit, beat me to it Wedgie, but looks as though we have the same.

That's cool mate, at least I know one of my figures is correct if you got the same figure.

It's only Round 2 I know, but shouldn't that be 'daylight' taking up 2nd possie?

No !

When Channel 9 flashed up the ladder during the evening news, they had the Bays in 5th spot.

FFS, was it that hard to pull out a calculator and work out the percentage?

Frickin' AMATEURS.

Pseudo wrote:When Channel 9 flashed up the ladder during the evening news, they had the Bays in 5th spot.

FFS, was it that hard to pull out a calculator and work out the percentage?

Frickin' AMATEURS.

Well at least I can add up better than Channel 9!
Don't know if that's something to add to my CV though.

LEAGUE
1. ST 2w 66.15% 4Pts
2. SA 2w 52.2% 4pts
3. GL 1w 53.52% 2pts
4. NA 1w 51.33% 2pts
5. CD 1w 46.06% 2pts
6. ND 1w 45.42% 2pts
7. PA 0w 47.22% 0pts
8. EA 0w 44.59% 0pts
9. WA0w39.88% 0pts


RESERVES
1. ND 2W 51.68% 4PTS
2. NA 1W 66.19% 2PTS
3. ST 1W 63.19% 2PTS
4. GL 1W 5615% 2PTS
5. PA 1W 54.08% 2PTS
6. EA 1W 47.51% 2PTS
7. CD 1W 39.03% 2PTS
8. WA 0W 47.59% 0PTS
9. SA 0W 34.47% 0PTS

U19

1. PA 2W 60.49% 4PTS
2. ST 2W 59.89% 4PTS
3. EA 2W 55.42% 4PTS
4. WA 1W 60.64% 2PTS
5. GL 1W 55.11% 2PTS
6. ND 0W 41.91% 0PTS
7. NA 0W 41.32% 0PTS
8. CD 0W 40.54% 0PTS
9. SA 0W 35.85% 0PTS

U17

1. PA 2W 73.95% 4PTS
2. EA 2W 71.8% 4PTS
3. ST 2W 67.49% 4PTS
4. WA 1W 53.65% 2PTS
5. GL 1W 52.30% 2PTS
6. ND 0W 46.11% 0PTS
7. SA 0W 29.62% 0PTS
8. CD 0W 24.33% 0PTS
9. NA 0W 16.16% 0PTS


I posted this after noticing the Sunday Mail stuffed up again

Wow, the U17 comp looks real even,
3 teams with % under 30
3 teams with % over 65

A big well done to the Sunday Mail who had North 7th on the table when in fact they're 2nd.
Why the hell do they bother?
Who the hell puts them together and perhaps the Sports Editor should spend a bit more time EDITTING instead of writing the pathetic piece of crap of a story he did today.