Page 1 of 1
Not much has changed

Posted:
Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:46 pm
by Rupert My Boy
Seems like not much has changed at Noarlunga. Compulsory training over Easter, 5 guys turned up for training that were "off their face". Been out all night and went to training in a pretty ordinary state, I believe.
Re: Not much has changed

Posted:
Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:53 pm
by darley16
Rupe my boy, same can be said of a club out westside of the city, not just a south issue and somewhat expected of young footballers, some can cover it up better than others. However, i guarantee those players were worked hard on the track by Jack & Mike maybe that should have been added to your stir.
Re: Not much has changed

Posted:
Wed Mar 26, 2008 4:05 pm
by Rupert My Boy
Mr Darley, I only posted what I know, not in the habit of guessing the outcome as that only leads to silly replies from other people. As for the bit about it happening elsewhere and it's to be expected from young guys, where did you get that from, is that now a rule or a fact of life?
Re: Not much has changed

Posted:
Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:41 pm
by southee
Rupert My Boy wrote:Mr Darley, I only posted what I know, not in the habit of guessing the outcome as that only leads to silly replies from other people. As for the bit about it happening elsewhere and it's to be expected from young guys, where did you get that from, is that now a rule or a fact of life?
Where did you get that from???? Is that a fact Rupert???

Re: Not much has changed

Posted:
Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:48 am
by Mickyj
Rupert My Boy wrote:Mr Darley, I only posted what I know, not in the habit of guessing the outcome as that only leads to silly replies from other people. As for the bit about it happening elsewhere and it's to be expected from young guys, where did you get that from, is that now a rule or a fact of life?
Pity I am on holidays I could have checked with my South source will have to wait until near Anzac day to find out

Re: Not much has changed

Posted:
Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:39 am
by Rupert My Boy
Southee, that is correct as told to me on Tuesday. Came from a reliable source and I have no reason to doubt where it came from.