SA Footy

Open to debate.

Aj has done a fantastic job since 2004.

Seasons greetings to all.

Go SANFL!!!!!

over the full season (which is what you go by, plus they did play in the gf) yes it's north

over the first half of the season = sturt
over the 2nd half of the season = glenelg

That win over Sturt in the final round set it up for North. I know most Glenelg fans were hoping we would get another shot at them but it was not to be.

bayman wrote:over the full season (which is what you go by, plus they did play in the gf) yes it's north

over the first half of the season = sturt
over the 2nd half of the season = glenelg

Pretty well summed up, didn't matter though, just the best of the bottom 8, the Dogs were a mile in front.

sturtpeter wrote:Open to debate.

Aj has done a fantastic job since 2004.

Seasons greetings to all.

Go SANFL!!!!!

You can't be serious with some of the topics you have posted on here in the off season???

BPBRB wrote:

sturtpeter wrote:Open to debate.

Aj has done a fantastic job since 2004.

Seasons greetings to all.

Go SANFL!!!!!

You can't be serious with some of the topics you have posted on here in the off season???

No, he can't be serious. He didn't mention the S-word once!

It won't last

sturtpeter wrote:Open to debate.

Aj has done a fantastic job since 2004.

Seasons greetings to all.

Go SANFL!!!!!

Yes

bayman wrote:over the first half of the season = sturt
over the 2nd half of the season = glenelg

those stats mean nothing its the whole year thats important.

the joker wrote:

bayman wrote:over the first half of the season = sturt
over the 2nd half of the season = glenelg

those stats mean nothing its the whole year thats important.

Which is precisely why his first statement was thus:

bayman wrote:over the full season (which is what you go by, plus they did play in the gf) yes it's north

sturtpeter wrote:Open to debate.

Aj has done a fantastic job since 2004.

Seasons greetings to all.

Go SANFL!!!!!

Yes they were.

Quite easily.


Unlike Sturt who had more teams finish above them then below them.

ROFLMAO@RB. How many teams finished below Sturt? And how many teams finished above them? Certainly there weren't more finishing lower.

Might have to change that signature to just simply "I have no idea"

Grahaml wrote:ROFLMAO@RB. How many teams finished below Sturt? And how many teams finished above them? Certainly there weren't more finishing lower.

Might have to change that signature to just simply "I have no idea"

Hooray for beer! (and bourbon and red wine and baileys)

And Scotch!

Made for a good laugh though. If you change it I won't tell anyone.

Ian wrote:

bayman wrote:over the full season (which is what you go by, plus they did play in the gf) yes it's north

over the first half of the season = sturt
over the 2nd half of the season = glenelg

Pretty well summed up, didn't matter though, just the best of the bottom 8, the Dogs were a mile in front.

thats spot on

i thought no-one remembers second spot

obviously SP does

Ordinary question for mine SP, the ladder never lies ... On top of that, as far as the teams my mob came up against they were 2nd best no question, keep fishing ...

Rushby Hinds wrote:

Grahaml wrote:ROFLMAO@RB. How many teams finished below Sturt? And how many teams finished above them? Certainly there weren't more finishing lower.

Might have to change that signature to just simply "I have no idea"

Hooray for beer! (and bourbon and red wine and baileys)

IN THE SAME GLASS!

No prizes for coming second

bayman wrote:over the full season (which is what you go by, plus they did play in the gf) yes it's north

over the first half of the season = sturt
over the 2nd half of the season = glenelg

I'd say the Eagles played better footy in the second half of the year than the Bays

Constance_Perm wrote:Ordinary question for mine SP, the ladder never lies ... On top of that, as far as the teams my mob came up against they were 2nd best no question, keep fishing ...

I think that in 2007 the ladder DID lie, IMO. I thought that Port deserved to be up* the ladder possibly 2 positions*. They were very unlucky in a few games &, like I have stated before, with a few minor alterations & tweeks this year, they will be right up there*-in fact, I think that they are genuine GF candidates in '08.