Page 1 of 2

U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:11 am
by Wedgie
Too good, Central's are a machine.
Just got home so I'm sorry I didn't post earlier.
Central's are awesome.
Goodnight.

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:20 am
by MightyEagles
Where's the pics?

Forget about the question, just found them.

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:21 am
by Wedgie
MightyEagles wrote:Where's the pics?


Coming, but I only took pics before the game and I haven't got to bed yet, feeling a tad lethargic.
No pics of the actual game as I thought I'd actually watch a game for a change, that was a mistake! :?

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:08 pm
by SnappyTom
Wedgie wrote:
MightyEagles wrote:Where's the pics?


Coming, but I only took pics before the game and I haven't got to bed yet, feeling a tad lethargic.
No pics of the actual game as I thought I'd actually watch a game for a change, that was a mistake! :?


Did we finally beat an SANFL "PowerHouse" in a Grand Final, Wedgeman...

ST...

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:31 pm
by HeartBeatsTrue
SnappyTom wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
MightyEagles wrote:Where's the pics?


Coming, but I only took pics before the game and I haven't got to bed yet, feeling a tad lethargic.
No pics of the actual game as I thought I'd actually watch a game for a change, that was a mistake! :?


Did we finally beat an SANFL "PowerHouse" in a Grand Final, Wedgeman...

ST...


OK... I'll do it... I know you've been waiting for it.....

You still havent beaten Port in a grand final. ;)

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:36 pm
by SnappyTom
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:
OK... I'll do it... I know you've been waiting for it.....

You still havent beaten Port in a grand final. ;)


But Wedgeman outlined all the Powerhouses, and North were in there.
I thought this got us over the Port only criteria.

:D :D :D

ST...

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:38 pm
by Wedgie
SnappyTom wrote:
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:
OK... I'll do it... I know you've been waiting for it.....

You still havent beaten Port in a grand final. ;)


But Wedgeman outlined all the Powerhouses, and North were in there.
I thought this got us over the Port only criteria.

:D :D :D

ST...


You beat one but you didn't become one.

You're only a Powerhouse if you beat the Port Adelaide Football Club in GFs.
Everyone knows that. :wink:

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:41 pm
by SnappyTom
Didn't say we'd become on, just wondered if we finally beat one...

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:43 pm
by Wedgie
SnappyTom wrote:Didn't say we'd become one


I didn't say you said that you'd become one. :?

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:46 pm
by SnappyTom
Wedgie wrote:
SnappyTom wrote:Didn't say we'd become one


I didn't say you said that you'd become one. :?


No, but for some reason you did say we didn't become one. Not sure why, because it's the first time it was raised.
You stated a couple of months ago that we'd never beaten a powerhouse of the SANFL before in a GF, but that's been laid to rest, eh!

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:47 pm
by Wedgie
SnappyTom wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
SnappyTom wrote:Didn't say we'd become one


I didn't say you said that you'd become one. :?


No, but for some reason you did say we didn't become one.

Yeah but you said you didn't say you'd become one when I didn't say that you said you'd become one. :?

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:50 pm
by SnappyTom
Wedgie wrote:
SnappyTom wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
SnappyTom wrote:Didn't say we'd become one


I didn't say you said that you'd become one. :?


No, but for some reason you did say we didn't become one.

Yeah but you said you didn't say you'd become one when I didn't say that you said you'd become one. :?


You still drinking, Wedgeman!
While rapt with the result (a win), I'm a bit disappointed the match wasn't a close one. The last SANFL beauty was 1999 as far as neutrals and closeness are concerned. Seems that in the modern era there are bigger results than previous times.

Spoils it for half the fans, that's all.

But we've now beaten a Powerhouse, without becoing one - woohoo...

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:59 pm
by Wedgie
SnappyTom wrote:You still drinking, Wedgeman!

No, and I take offence that you insinuate I may be. I didn't insult you at all.

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:31 pm
by Dog_ger
Looked for you my friend....

Your a hard man to find in a carpark of red.....

Your sea or red buddies told me you had gone into the groung early.....

With Gritted teeth of course :lol:

I don't think they liked me scarf...? :wink:

Well done the teams of the North.

1 & 2. =D>

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:38 pm
by Brucetiki
I think 6 premierships in 8 years is enough to be classed as a Powerhouse era. So what if we haven't beaten Port - they haven't been good enough to make in this era that's not Centrals problem.

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:53 pm
by Aerie
SnappyTom wrote:While rapt with the result (a win), I'm a bit disappointed the match wasn't a close one. The last SANFL beauty was 1999 as far as neutrals and closeness are concerned. Seems that in the modern era there are bigger results than previous times.

Spoils it for half the fans, that's all.

But we've now beaten a Powerhouse, without becoing one - woohoo...


I thought the 2005 GF was a great game up until the last quarter...

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:35 pm
by spell_check
The only powerhouse in the SANFL at the moment is the CDFC. I've gone through this earlier in the year; someone in that thread said that beating the West Indies has no special meaning anymore, because they haven't been a power since the mid 90s. That's the comparison from International Cricket to the SANFL scene now.

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:43 am
by Mic
I see Centrals winning the flag next year as well. North have a long long way to go until they are the standard of Centrals.

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:11 am
by Dog_ger
Almost good enough for an AFL invitation. That would get rid of the SANFL bye and even up the competition a little hey guys....? :lol: :lol: :wink:

Re: U-Dogs

PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:29 am
by johntheclaret
Dog_ger wrote:Almost good enough for an AFL invitation. That would get rid of the SANFL bye and even up the competition a little hey guys....? :lol: :lol: :wink:


Come out of the clouds Dog_ger :roll: