Messenger 18/09/07: Is it time to bounce this tradition?

Is it time to bounce this tradition?
18Sep07
THERE'S something majestic about the first bounce of the first final, and of a Grand Final.
But will we ever see the last bounce? My money says yes, and soon.
Bouncing the ball to start play and at stoppages is not compulsory for SANFL umpires, but younger umps with AFL aspirations still do, as required by the AFL.
An obvious reason to dislike the bounce is it can unnecessarily give one team an advantage, but then again, it adds a lot of character to this Australian game.
But there's plenty of other reasons why the bounce should be on its last legs, including the short and long term toll it takes on umpires' bodies.
Bouncing the ball requires an explosive exertion of force through an umpire's body, not unlike doing some hard labour with a sledge hammer.
Doing this every few minutes in a game is a great physical strain, and SANFL umpiring director Shane Harris is an advocate for getting rid of the bounce.
``It's not a natural action,'' Harris says.
``We started throwing the ball up in 2005 and the feedback from our senior umpires was their recovery with their hamstrings and backs was a lot better and quicker.
``Personally I'd love to see the bounce go, all it does is put pressure on the umpires.''
Tim Pfeiffer, who umpired the weekend's North v Eagles game, has benefited from being allowed to throw the ball up.
With 365 SANFL and 44 AFL games behind him, 39-year-old Pfeiffer says removing the bounce could be credited with keeping some of the league's older umpires going.
``It's hard to know, but it might have added one or two years,'' Pfeiffer says.
``(Bouncing) puts a lot of extra pressure through your stomach and back to get the ball to a certain height.''
Pfeiffer says bouncing the ball has a mental impact too.
``I was reasonably consistent, but inevitably there'd be a bounce that goes off and you'd be worried about it next time, it affects your concentration.''
But he is skeptical on whether change is on the way.
``It's a unique part of our game, there's no other game that does it.
``But then again should we hang onto it just because it's unique?''
So where to? Even keeping the bounce in some token role like the start of a game, or for Grand Final day would require umpires to be in training for it. So as unique as it is, it seems time to throw the bounce out.
DALE CLARKE
18Sep07
THERE'S something majestic about the first bounce of the first final, and of a Grand Final.
But will we ever see the last bounce? My money says yes, and soon.
Bouncing the ball to start play and at stoppages is not compulsory for SANFL umpires, but younger umps with AFL aspirations still do, as required by the AFL.
An obvious reason to dislike the bounce is it can unnecessarily give one team an advantage, but then again, it adds a lot of character to this Australian game.
But there's plenty of other reasons why the bounce should be on its last legs, including the short and long term toll it takes on umpires' bodies.
Bouncing the ball requires an explosive exertion of force through an umpire's body, not unlike doing some hard labour with a sledge hammer.
Doing this every few minutes in a game is a great physical strain, and SANFL umpiring director Shane Harris is an advocate for getting rid of the bounce.
``It's not a natural action,'' Harris says.
``We started throwing the ball up in 2005 and the feedback from our senior umpires was their recovery with their hamstrings and backs was a lot better and quicker.
``Personally I'd love to see the bounce go, all it does is put pressure on the umpires.''
Tim Pfeiffer, who umpired the weekend's North v Eagles game, has benefited from being allowed to throw the ball up.
With 365 SANFL and 44 AFL games behind him, 39-year-old Pfeiffer says removing the bounce could be credited with keeping some of the league's older umpires going.
``It's hard to know, but it might have added one or two years,'' Pfeiffer says.
``(Bouncing) puts a lot of extra pressure through your stomach and back to get the ball to a certain height.''
Pfeiffer says bouncing the ball has a mental impact too.
``I was reasonably consistent, but inevitably there'd be a bounce that goes off and you'd be worried about it next time, it affects your concentration.''
But he is skeptical on whether change is on the way.
``It's a unique part of our game, there's no other game that does it.
``But then again should we hang onto it just because it's unique?''
So where to? Even keeping the bounce in some token role like the start of a game, or for Grand Final day would require umpires to be in training for it. So as unique as it is, it seems time to throw the bounce out.
DALE CLARKE