Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:10 pmPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:19 pmPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:20 pm
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:23 pmPseudo wrote:Each coach got to vote 4 times on a 3-2-1 basis?
That would guarantee that Jars ended the poll with at least 12 points...
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:44 pmPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:50 pmHeartBeatsTrue wrote:Based on success there's no disputing it going to Laird. You could even give him the coach of the decade award.
Based on club improvement you cant go past MacGowan.
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:57 pmPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:38 pmBPBRB wrote:Pseudo wrote:Each coach got to vote 4 times on a 3-2-1 basis?
That would guarantee that Jars ended the poll with at least 12 points...
I wonder how many Mickan would have got for "personality" and 1/4 and and 3/4 time speeches?
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:43 pmAerie wrote:BPBRB wrote:Pseudo wrote:Each coach got to vote 4 times on a 3-2-1 basis?
That would guarantee that Jars ended the poll with at least 12 points...
I wonder how many Mickan would have got for "personality" and 1/4 and and 3/4 time speeches?
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:51 pmPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:25 pmHeartBeatsTrue wrote:Based on success there's no disputing it going to Laird. You could even give him the coach of the decade award.
Based on club improvement you cant go past MacGowan.
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:32 pmhondo71 wrote:HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Based on success there's no disputing it going to Laird. You could even give him the coach of the decade award.
Based on club improvement you cant go past MacGowan.
Sturt finished 5th in 2005, 3rd in 2004, 4th in 2003, premiers in 2002. That one bad season in 2006 has distracted us I reckon.
Look at their team for Sunday and tell me that isn't a fair bit better than any team outside the top 5.
No disrespect to Rick, but I don't buy the line that this is a potential wooden-spooner massively over-achieving. They are about where they should be IMO.
Back to topic - well deserved award for Roy Laird
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:22 amDutchy wrote:hondo71 wrote:HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Based on success there's no disputing it going to Laird. You could even give him the coach of the decade award.
Based on club improvement you cant go past MacGowan.
Sturt finished 5th in 2005, 3rd in 2004, 4th in 2003, premiers in 2002. That one bad season in 2006 has distracted us I reckon.
Look at their team for Sunday and tell me that isn't a fair bit better than any team outside the top 5.
No disrespect to Rick, but I don't buy the line that this is a potential wooden-spooner massively over-achieving. They are about where they should be IMO.
Back to topic - well deserved award for Roy Laird
Well said Hondo, Im sick of this poor sturt stuff, how about Mickan getting the Bays in the finals from the bottom of the ladder after 7 games for the first time since 1999? much bigger achievement than McGowan
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:01 ammighty_tiger_79 wrote:Aerie wrote:BPBRB wrote:Pseudo wrote:Each coach got to vote 4 times on a 3-2-1 basis?
That would guarantee that Jars ended the poll with at least 12 points...
I wonder how many Mickan would have got for "personality" and 1/4 and and 3/4 time speeches?
Ooh! Yeah! Cop that bays fans![/quote]
well it has been mentioned on here before from BAY FANS!!!!!
we acknowledge he may not have personality like jars or be inspirational at the breaks but he has been getting results
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:07 amPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:08 amWedgie wrote:Congratulations Roy Laird, easily the best coach going around in the SANFL, all class.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:10 amPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:11 amBPBRB wrote:Wedgie wrote:Congratulations Roy Laird, easily the best coach going around in the SANFL, all class.
No doubt the only choice IMO
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:26 amhondo71 wrote:HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Based on success there's no disputing it going to Laird. You could even give him the coach of the decade award.
Based on club improvement you cant go past MacGowan.
Sturt finished 5th in 2005, 3rd in 2004, 4th in 2003, premiers in 2002. That one bad season in 2006 has distracted us I reckon.
Look at their team for Sunday and tell me that isn't a fair bit better than any team outside the top 5.
No disrespect to Rick, but I don't buy the line that this is a potential wooden-spooner massively over-achieving. They are about where they should be IMO.
Back to topic - well deserved award for Roy Laird
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:27 amsmithy wrote:Are they all idiots or are you a genious ?