Page 1 of 1

Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:24 pm
by cd
I believe the decision tonight re Brett was guilty and reprimanded
To be confirmed

Col D
Personal Post Only - was just phoned by a mate with the above.

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:29 pm
by sturt1
cd wrote:I believe the decision tonight re Brett was guilty and reprimanded
To be confirmed

Col D
Personal Post Only - was just phoned by a mate with the above.


Tough man is brett, really showed how tough he was on friday. This post will incite a riot.

Understand this is yet to be confirmed.

For all the biased supporters their at the game on friday night, what do you think was brett unfairly treated by the umps?

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:36 pm
by pipers
I heard he was reported for being ginger... :-)

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:35 am
by Wedgie
Saw it on replay last night, basically a two handed push to the chest in a clumsy sheperd, didn't even warrant a report but did warrant a free. Scharples got straight up as there was no head contact or elbow involved as some idiot claimed unless Budgie keeps his elbows on his hands.

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:39 am
by cd
Confirmed in this morning's paper - apparently Brett pleaded guilty

Col D
Personal Post Only

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:44 am
by Rushby Hinds
Why do North players keep pleading guilty when they are innocent? :lol:

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:51 am
by Wedgie
Why do people keep posting when they can't read?
He was guilty of striking Scharples with 2 hands to his chest, its not like he hit a guy in the head and caused a concussion.

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:06 am
by LPH
Eagle reject... Eagle reject... Ooohh... Ooohh !!!! 8)

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:53 am
by Rhino
Clumsy. Not malicious.

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:10 pm
by Punk Rooster
sturt1 wrote:
cd wrote:I believe the decision tonight re Brett was guilty and reprimanded
To be confirmed

Col D
Personal Post Only - was just phoned by a mate with the above.


Tough man is brett, really showed how tough he was on friday. This post will incite a riot.

Understand this is yet to be confirmed.

For all the biased supporters their at the game on friday night, what do you think was brett unfairly treated by the umps?

Speaking of tough, what about the Sturt cheersquad, picking people off when they lose?
Hitting people with flags etc.
Wonder how that poor South supporter is they hospitalised, that was tough...

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:44 pm
by lesthemechanic
Can one of the moderators put all the Sturt bashing posts into a new thread, then maybe some of the others will stay on subject. Isn't this one about Brett O'Hara.
Anyway, I thought the incident was a worth a reprimand & not suspension, sanity prevails.He's probably itching to play against his old club in a final too.
I think he was just welcoming the little fella to the SANFL !

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:46 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
ban the sturt people!!!!!!!! :lol:

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:27 pm
by sturt1
brett could have picked someone just a bit bigger, but i still say he is tough. Tough ginger bread man.

Re: Tribunal report - Brett O'Hara

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:28 pm
by sturt1
fatalberton wrote:I heard he was reported for being ginger... :-)

:lol: