Page 1 of 10

2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:14 am
by bayman
can north upset the eagle applecart or will the eagles book a 2nd semi final berth ?

Re: qualifying final eagles v north adelaide

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:14 am
by bayman
eagles easily

Re: qualifying final eagles v north adelaide

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:51 am
by Mic
North are a complete mixed bag - you never know what you're going to get. We have the potential to win the Premiership, we also have the potential to lose out of the finals in straight sets.

Re: qualifying final eagles v north adelaide

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:59 am
by RoosterMarty
North will win

Re: qualifying final eagles v north adelaide

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:42 am
by scott
Hold the phone, mathematically Sturt can still be featuring in this game at the expense of Woodville/West Torrens.

If Glenelg beat the Eagles roughly between 16 and 17 goals then the Double Blues will supersede W/WT for the extra chance.

For an exact score, if the Eagles register 30 points tomorrow, the Tigers would need to score 133 for Sturt to get the double chance. If W/WT score 60 points, Glenelg would need 160 points precisely. If the Eagles score 90 points, the Tigers would need 188 points.

Unlikely, but still...

Re: qualifying final eagles v north adelaide

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:27 am
by Mickyj
scott wrote:Hold the phone, mathematically Sturt can still be featuring in this game at the expense of Woodville/West Torrens.

If Glenelg beat the Eagles roughly between 16 and 17 goals then the Double Blues will supersede W/WT for the extra chance.

For an exact score, if the Eagles register 30 points tomorrow, the Tigers would need to score 133 for Sturt to get the double chance. If W/WT score 60 points, Glenelg would need 160 points precisely. If the Eagles score 90 points, the Tigers would need 188 points.

Unlikely, but still...


Fat frigging chance Scott
Go you mighty high flying reigning premier EAGLES

Re: qualifying final eagles v north adelaide

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:35 am
by Ecky
Well said Scott - I was about to point out the same thing. :)

Go the Tigers!

Re: qualifying final eagles v north adelaide

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:24 am
by Rushby Hinds
scott wrote:Hold the phone, mathematically Sturt can still be featuring in this game at the expense of Woodville/West Torrens.

If Glenelg beat the Eagles roughly between 16 and 17 goals then the Double Blues will supersede W/WT for the extra chance.

For an exact score, if the Eagles register 30 points tomorrow, the Tigers would need to score 133 for Sturt to get the double chance. If W/WT score 60 points, Glenelg would need 160 points precisely. If the Eagles score 90 points, the Tigers would need 188 points.

Unlikely, but still...



Ah hell, i wish i had read your post before spending 15 minutes with a slide rule, sun dial and abacus! :oops:

Eerily, we both uses a same example (WWT scoring 30 points)

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:28 am
by Dog_ger
Has North Played their Best Too EARLY....?

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:29 am
by Rushby Hinds
Dog_ger wrote:Has North Played their Best Too EARLY....?


????


They had a very slow start to the season.

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:36 am
by daveswar
Dog_ger wrote:Has North Played their Best Too EARLY....?

Yep 1 and a 1/2 1/4's and it wasn't early it was late. Just running into form and the difference between us and eagles last time was one Mrs. Mcgregor who will not be taking part in this match.

Go u mighty c's

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:42 am
by Aerie
daveswar wrote:
Dog_ger wrote:Has North Played their Best Too EARLY....?

Yep 1 and a 1/2 1/4's and it wasn't early it was late. Just running into form and the difference between us and eagles last time was one Mrs. Mcgregor who will not be taking part in this match.

Go u mighty c's


I thought it was the umpires?

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:51 am
by daveswar
Umpires? Who mentioned umpires? My name is not wedginald!! You win you lose umps may seem to have something to do with it but they are easy targets. If you play well enough the umps don't come into it. Take it on the chin and play on.

3 blind mice..., etc(only really hurts when it's colour blindness eh Wedgie)

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:56 am
by Dog_ger
Must have bee a bloody good game for Rooster supporters......

Mrs_Dog_ger came back so pumped she thumped me....

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:00 pm
by Hondo
Well, the top 3 ended up exactly as most of us predicted at the start of the season.

Eagles and North are very evenly matched up and Centrals are not as far ahead of them as some would think. Should be a great few weeks coming up!

The reigning premier deserves to be favourite however I defy any rational supporter to build up an 'easy win' case this week

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:01 pm
by Strawb
Dog_ger wrote:Must have bee a bloody good game for Rooster supporters......

Mrs_Dog_ger came back so pumped she thumped me....

So did Mrs Dogger still get breakfast in bed??

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:44 pm
by Dog_ger
With a bacon and egg muffin Strawb......

Green Tea......

And many kisses.....

Eat your heart out Buddy....

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:26 pm
by purch
Could be an interesting week at the tribunal...Eagles by plenty (unless it's the Bays by plenty today & everything changes)

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:40 pm
by Strawb
Dog_ger wrote:With a bacon and egg muffin Strawb......

Green Tea......

And many kisses.....

Eat your heart out Buddy....

Hell I had to work this morning but tomorrow morning I will serve Mrs Strawbs breakfast in bed. Also I will try and get my own Kind of breakfast in Bed ;)

Re: 2007 Qualifying Final North v Eagles

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 6:23 pm
by Rucciangelo
daveswar wrote:
Dog_ger wrote:Has North Played their Best Too EARLY....?

Yep 1 and a 1/2 1/4's and it wasn't early it was late. Just running into form and the difference between us and eagles last time was one Mrs. Mcgregor who will not be taking part in this match.

Go u mighty c's


According to Ron Fuller today the Eagles will have a peaceful easy feelin' that Ken McGregor and Bernie Vince will be allowed to play finals...in the long run!