SA Footy

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:53 am**

I think Gavin Colville and Leigh Treeby came straight out of the TAC Cup competition to the Eagles, but that was sometime ago.

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:37 pm**

goddy11 wrote:
JK wrote:
PatowalongaPirate wrote:
sib wrote:Luke WIlson has played SANFL footy level before at Port with his brother. Now we got all 3 brothers together.

Wilson Brothers on the Parade.jpg

And the 4th brother

Wasn't he eaten by a shark.

Needed someone to pump up his inflated ego, and eventually let himself down.

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:49 pm**

goddy11 wrote:
JK wrote:

Wasn't he eaten by a shark.

No, that was one of his relatives:

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 2:44 pm**

Will Abbott (Norwood signing) is either an ex Sturt or Norwood player (memory fading!) who I thought may have played a league game or two but his name is not on the list in the history forum. Perhaps he played reserves.

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 6:46 pm**

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/messenger ... 30eb975125

Menu

SubscribeLogin

NEWS AFL SPORT ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS LIFESTYLE REAL ESTATE MOTORING CLASSIFIEDS

Port Adelaide SANFL captain Steven Summerton has re-signed with the club and will be available to play every league game in 2018. PICTURE: Tricia Watkinson.

WEST & BEACHES

Port Adelaide Magpies skipper Steven Summerton re-signs following SANFL rule change that allows him to play every game

Daniela Abbracciavento, Portside Weekly Messenger

December 15, 2017 4:39pm

STEVEN Summerton will be eligible to play in every Port Adelaide league game next year after a SANFL rule change.

The Magpies captain was forced to play five reserves games this past season because of a SANFL rule stipulating that available Power players had to be selected ahead of those with league contracts.

But as of 2018, the 29-year-old midfielder, who has re-signed with Port today, will be able to feature in every league game regardless of the number of AFL-listed players available.

The SANFL announced today that it had changed its rule and both the Port and Crows reserves teams would be able to field one marquee contracted player – such as Summerton – in every match.

SANFL football general manger Adam Kelly said the original rule was introduced in the first year of fielding AFL reserves teams in the state league in 2014 to uphold the integrity of the competition.

Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.

“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.

“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.

“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 6:58 pm**

Booney wrote:Menu

SubscribeLogin

NEWS AFL SPORT ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS LIFESTYLE REAL ESTATE MOTORING CLASSIFIEDS

WEST & BEACHES

Daniela Abbracciavento, Portside Weekly Messenger

December 15, 2017 4:39pm

Excellent news!

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:31 pm**

Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.

“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.

“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.

“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”

With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???

Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians! :lol:

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:42 pm**

Wedgie wrote:
Booney wrote:Menu

SubscribeLogin

NEWS AFL SPORT ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS LIFESTYLE REAL ESTATE MOTORING CLASSIFIEDS

WEST & BEACHES

Daniela Abbracciavento, Portside Weekly Messenger

December 15, 2017 4:39pm

Excellent news!

Posting from phone. #-o

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:59 pm**

Dutchy wrote:
Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.

“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.

“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.

“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”

With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???

Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!

The reality is they changed the rule for one bloke!
Ridiculous

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:25 pm**

Dutchy wrote:
Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.

“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.

“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.

“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”

With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???

Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!

So in a perfect world if the crows have a marquee and no injuries some of their AFL players may not get a game at all.

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:31 pm**

goddy11 wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.

“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.

“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.

“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”

With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???

Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!

So in a perfect world if the crows have a marquee and no injuries some of their AFL players may not get a game at all.

Bottom placed reserves team no doubt, thus screwing the integrity of that comp too

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:34 pm**

Booney wrote:“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:56 pm**

amber_fluid wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.

“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.

“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.

“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”

With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???

Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!

The reality is they changed the rule for one bloke!
Ridiculous

You couldn’t make this shit up :lol:

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 10:52 pm**

Pseudo wrote:
Booney wrote:“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.

You know it really is a joke when it can make George HW Bush crack a smile.

Posted: **Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:21 pm**

amber_fluid wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.

“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.

“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.

“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”

With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???

Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!

The reality is they changed the rule for one bloke!
Ridiculous

The rules have been changed before (Luke Reynolds at least one instance) .. No one bothers fighting it when 6 clubs are spineless and the other 2 get disregarded. As Dutchy said, policy on the run, run by false custodians that hopefully history shows to be a gutless, selfish, bunch of self serving pigs.

Posted: **Sat Dec 16, 2017 3:56 am**

Magellan wrote:
goddy11 wrote:
JK wrote:
PatowalongaPirate wrote:
[attachment=0]Wilson

And the 4th brother

Wasn't he eaten by a shark.

Needed someone to pump up his inflated ego, and eventually let himself down.

You’ve gotta hand it to him though. Bloody good effort on the face of it.

Posted: **Sat Dec 16, 2017 3:58 am**

Pseudo wrote:
goddy11 wrote:
JK wrote:

Wasn't he eaten by a shark.

No, that was one of his relatives:

You can Burley recognize the family resemblance.

Posted: **Sat Dec 16, 2017 7:44 am**

All this hurley-Burley's making my hair go curly and twirly, surely someone should get in early and bring back Craig Turley.

Posted: **Sat Dec 16, 2017 7:52 am**

Magellan wrote:All this hurley-Burley's making my hair go curly and twirly, surely someone should get in early and bring back Craig Turley.

Shirley you can't be serious ...

Posted: **Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:18 am**

amber_fluid wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.

“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.

“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.

“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”

With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???

Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!

The reality is they changed the rule for one bloke!
Ridiculous

Port has also contracted some other players including a WWT player and a Centrals player plus some interstate academy players. The rule are very flexible at the best. The benefits of no salary cap for the PAM.

http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/2 ... s-for-2018

SA Footy

INS and OUTS for 2019

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018

Re: INS and OUTS for 2018