SA Footy

SABRE wrote:

cennals05 wrote:I think I can already guess what Norwood supporters will be doing next week.

Very perceptive 'cennals'.
I believe all Norwood supporters would commend Westies fans for their magnificent attitude.
Perhaps we should all be taking hammers and mallets to maximise the decibel levels on signage for the benefit
of these AFL woosies who have no right to exist in OUR COMPETITION.
Then, if their Weslo puppet muppets make any attempt to stop our freedom of expression, these implements
could come in very handy indeed.

Vive la révolution !
"MAKE NOISE FOR YOUR BOYS & FORCE OUT THE TOYS !!!"

Luv,
Sabre.

Sabre's rattling!

Bugga banging on the fence, lets go the whole hog

Crowds

North vs Norwood - 2,019

Centrals vs Port - 1,444

Glenelg vs South - 1,604

West vs Crows - 1,359

JK wrote:

Grenville wrote:Enjoyed the Cocks v Legs game, both teams had a dip, umpires missed a couple either way but generally let the game go. Craig going off leaving Baulderstone to dominate was probably the difference in the end.

Yep good assessment mate

Yes, was a good contest, with the better skilled and better resourced team getting the points. Baulderstone gave the 'Legs' small men first opportunity (a bit too easily for my liking) in the last when the game was three to be won, and North could've done with some of the tall timber that Norwood had as a backup ruckman for James Craig or as a marking target up forward.

Thought North had control in the first half of the third quarter but couldn't take proper advantage on the scoreboard. Like most good sides, Norwood soaked up the pressure and slowly pegged the margin and hit the front by lemon time. On about three occasions Norwood literally waltzed out of the square with the footy and goaled. North kept at it but coudn't bridge the one goal gap. Also Norwood missed a few gettable shots in the last as well which made the 16 point margin a bit kind to the Chooks.

Another good time was had in the Prospect RSL at half time, cheap Coopers and I won $20 in the lucky square raffle! Thanks to the guys at the RSL, would've put it back across the bar if I wasn't driving.

Gozu wrote:Crowds

North vs Norwood - 2,019

Centrals vs Port - 1,444

Glenelg vs South - 1,604

West vs Crows - 1,359

I think someone just doubled the actual crowd at Richmond as there isn't a hope in hell there were that many there.

amber_fluid wrote:

Gozu wrote:Crowds

North vs Norwood - 2,019

Centrals vs Port - 1,444

Glenelg vs South - 1,604

West vs Crows - 1,359

I think someone just doubled the actual crowd at Richmond as there isn't a hope in hell there were that many there.

Must of included the amount of bangs on the fence aswell

Jim05 wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:

Gozu wrote:Crowds

North vs Norwood - 2,019

Centrals vs Port - 1,444

Glenelg vs South - 1,604

West vs Crows - 1,359

I think someone just doubled the actual crowd at Richmond as there isn't a hope in hell there were that many there.

Must of included the amount of bangs on the fence aswell

Maybe included number of Crow official's tears?

Most of the tears seem to be coming from this forum.
It's a non event. Move on.

Maybe a few were borrowed from Glenelg Oval and transferred to Richmond! As I said not a big crowd at the bay but 300 less than last week? Weird!

MW wrote:Most of the tears seem to be coming from this forum.

Some tears here, yes, but lots of incredulous yet unsurprised laughs too.

MW wrote:It's a non event. Move on.

Well....it must be an event of some description if it motivates the lodgement of a formal complaint with the governing body.

Anyway, we can't ignore it until the league decides the outcome during the week. I think it'll be interesting. Either the Crows' embarrassing conduct in complaining will be proven, or West Adelaide will be wound up and excommunicated from the comp forthwith.

MW wrote:Most of the tears seem to be coming from this forum.
It's a non event. Move on.

Yes, probably easier to focus on the complaints here, rather than the bratish behavior from the princesses at West Lakes

Things might not be as seen

Brodlach wrote:Things might not be as seen

A West Adelaide official said the Crows laid an official complaint, are you calling the West Adelaide official a liar?

Magellan wrote:

MW wrote:Most of the tears seem to be coming from this forum.

Some tears here, yes, but lots of incredulous yet unsurprised laughs too.

MW wrote:It's a non event. Move on.

Well....it must be an event of some description if it motivates the lodgement of a formal complaint with the governing body.

Anyway, we can't ignore it until the league decides the outcome during the week. I think it'll be interesting. Either the Crows' embarrassing conduct in complaining will be proven, or West Adelaide will be wound up and excommunicated from the comp forthwith.

Someone did legal studies in year 12...

I hope the SANFL don't deduct Westies premiership points for those alleged naughty supporters!

Wedgie wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Things might not be as seen

A West Adelaide official said the Crows laid an official complaint, are you calling the West Adelaide official a liar?

I'm not calling anyone a liar

Sturt got the breeze?

What are conditions like?

another grub wrote:What are conditions like?

It's pouring at Hindmarsh with no breeze. Woodville is about 5 mins down Port Road.