Rushby Hinds wrote:Will the other 8 teams subsidise the Bays because our Country zone is (possibly) the furthest away?
An extra hour's drive, get over it. What about Port's zone?
by Andy #24 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:39 pm
Rushby Hinds wrote:Will the other 8 teams subsidise the Bays because our Country zone is (possibly) the furthest away?
by bluestheboy » Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:44 pm
We would probably subsidise the sanfl to keep the port supporters home...Andy #24 wrote:Rushby Hinds wrote:Will the other 8 teams subsidise the Bays because our Country zone is (possibly) the furthest away?
An extra hour's drive, get over it. What about Port's zone?
by Rushby Hinds » Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:58 pm
Andy #24 wrote:Rushby Hinds wrote:Will the other 8 teams subsidise the Bays because our Country zone is (possibly) the furthest away?
An extra hour's drive, get over it. What about Port's zone?
by Andy #24 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:35 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:34 pm
Andy #24 wrote:An hour's extra drive compared to other country zones. Port on the EP is further away than the SE.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:36 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:40 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:42 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:hop on a plane to go to those places
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:47 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:48 pm
by Wedgie » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:48 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by topsywaldron » Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:18 pm
by am Bays » Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:49 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Are those zones designed to have roughly the same amount of people in them ike an electoral zone?
by cd » Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:50 pm
by Brad » Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:55 pm
Wedgie wrote:Ceduna and Coober Pedy looks further away than Mount Gambier to me Rushby!
by am Bays » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:03 pm
Wedgie wrote:Ceduna and Coober Pedy looks further away than Mount Gambier to me Rushby!
by smac » Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:03 pm
cd wrote:I believe is based upon 15 year old males by the govt census and is thus planned to be as equal as possible. May be out with the age used but seem to remember being told was of 15 year olds.
by HeartBeatsTrue » Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:52 pm
smac wrote:cd wrote:I believe is based upon 15 year old males by the govt census and is thus planned to be as equal as possible. May be out with the age used but seem to remember being told was of 15 year olds.
That's my understanding also Col. Am hopeful that they change it to cater for Aussie Rules participation levels in the future, that will ensure the most even allocation possible IMO.
Yes, I have biased reasons for suggesting this - our zone has a very low participation rate, half of most other zones.
by floataboy » Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:38 am
TroyGFC wrote:I am guessing that the main reason for not having country games could be that with the drought alot of ovals would be very hard and dry. From memory last season Glenelg were to play Sturt at Murray Bridge in a trial and Glenelg didn't want to due to oval's condition - I was all keen to go mind you and had booked into hotel next to bridge.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |