Re: Benson resigns at Sturt
Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:42 am
Feel free to name all the other things I got wrong too, Mr Analyst.
Happy to be corrected.
Happy to be corrected.
csbowes wrote:The analyst wrote:csbowes wrote:The analyst wrote:Any suggestion that Matt Benson was forced out by Sturt is utter rubbish, Maybe those inferring anything other than this should deal in facts over fiction.
My information comes from three sources and I know which board member led the charge...
So I have faith in what I've been told.
Unfortunately its not likely the full story will ever be publicised.
Well, and not for the first time on this forum, CS Bowes you are emphatically wrong.
8 posts... well you've been around a while.
Well what are your sources, not asking names. I'm guessing you might know or are a board member, which would be interesting.
I can only put forward what I've been told. If it's wrong, I'll have no way of knowing since I'm not on the board, but I have no reason to doubt the people who told me this or that.
Phil H has the same info as me, so its not just me you're saying has it wrong.
Maybe you're wrong? Always possible.
Can your sources confirm if the memorabilia story is true?
Bounce of the ball wrote:You have made comments with factual information Phil
PhilH wrote:Why am I being involved in this? Sure you have the correct Phil?
Bounce of the ball wrote:PhilH wrote:Why am I being involved in this? Sure you have the correct Phil?
I think the Phil they are referring to is the one that dodges replying with facts on many posts .
The analyst wrote:I didn't know on this forum you had to have over 1000 posts to be considered as knowing what your talking about. The fact is that Matt Benson was not sacked, asked to leave or pressured to leave. End of story. So consider csbowes and Big Phil as both being wrong. Good story ruined by inaccuracy I'm afraid.
PhilH wrote:Why am I being involved in this? Sure you have the correct Phil?
The analyst wrote:
I didn't know on this forum you had to have over 1000 posts to be considered as knowing what your talking about. The fact is that Matt Benson was not sacked, asked to leave or pressured to leave. End of story. So consider csbowes and Big Phil as both being wrong. Good story ruined by inaccuracy I'm afraid.
johntheclaret wrote:The analyst wrote:
I didn't know on this forum you had to have over 1000 posts to be considered as knowing what your talking about. The fact is that Matt Benson was not sacked, asked to leave or pressured to leave. End of story. So consider csbowes and Big Phil as both being wrong. Good story ruined by inaccuracy I'm afraid.
Actually it's 10,000 posts but hey what would I know
Wedgie wrote:johntheclaret wrote:The analyst wrote:
I didn't know on this forum you had to have over 1000 posts to be considered as knowing what your talking about. The fact is that Matt Benson was not sacked, asked to leave or pressured to leave. End of story. So consider csbowes and Big Phil as both being wrong. Good story ruined by inaccuracy I'm afraid.
Actually it's 10,000 posts but hey what would I know
Nup, its 30,000 posts
csbowes wrote:I don't know for sure, but i don't believe its from a deceased estate. There are a few estates promising funds for the club, but they are a while away from being deceased estates.