SA Footy

goddy11 wrote:PORT Adelaide has delisted Sam Skinner, Sam Mayes and Taj Schofield.
Will Taj join the WWT Eagles or move to join his father in WA

Big Phil wrote:

goddy11 wrote:PORT Adelaide has delisted Sam Skinner, Sam Mayes and Taj Schofield.
Will Taj join the WWT Eagles or move to join his father in WA

Or be recruited to another SANFL club that his father scarcely played at?

Spargo wrote:

Big Phil wrote:

goddy11 wrote:PORT Adelaide has delisted Sam Skinner, Sam Mayes and Taj Schofield.
Will Taj join the WWT Eagles or move to join his father in WA

Or be recruited to another SANFL club that his father scarcely played at?

Who would that be?

Wedgie wrote:North Adelaide has secured its eighth Stanley H. Lewis Trophy and first since 2014 as SANFL’s best performed club in 2022.

In the second year of points being awarded for Women’s and U16 matches, the Roosters finished with a significant tally of 3725, ahead of runner-up Sturt with 3525.

With their Hostplus SANFL League team winning its first minor premiership since 1989 and Reserves, Under-18 and Under-16 teams all qualifying for finals, the Roosters were also fuelled by their Women’s side, which claimed its second SANFLW premiership.

Glenelg tallied 3400 to round out the top three, edging out Norwood on 2900 in fourth and fifth-placed South on 2450.

North has previously won the Stanley H. Lewis Trophy in 1966, 1967, 1971, 1972, 2005, 2006, and 2014.

The Trophy, named after past SANFL Chairman Stanley Heathcote Lewis, has been awarded since 1962 to the club which has displayed excellence across all grades of football.

Points are awarded for each win across the minor round, with 100 points allocated for a Men’s and Women’s League victory, 50 points for the Reserves and Under-18s and 25 points for the Under-16s.

In the event of a draw, half of the points allocated for a win in that grade are awarded to each club involved.

mal wrote:With last month's form side of the SANFL , WA , missing finals , it makes NA the team to beat

bulldogproud wrote:

mal wrote:With last month's form side of the SANFL , WA , missing finals , it makes NA the team to beat

In a strange world, the bottom two sides in the SANFL are probably in as good as form as, if not better than, the top two

Wedgie wrote:

bulldogproud wrote:

mal wrote:With last month's form side of the SANFL , WA , missing finals , it makes NA the team to beat

In a strange world, the bottom two sides in the SANFL are probably in as good as form as, if not better than, the top two

Whilst I know you're kidding North won 3 out of their last 4 by a total of 115 points, Adelaide won 2 of their last 4 by a total of 95 points, West won 2 of their last 4 by a total of 5 points and Central lost their last 5 games.
I don't quite think the bottom 2 sides are in as good as form, if not better than, the top 2 sides.

bulldogproud wrote:True, but we ended up within a goal of three of the top five sides in those matches
We are probably in as good form as Norwood, Sturt and Glenelg at present... that goes for Westies too

am Bays wrote:

bulldogproud wrote:True, but we ended up within a goal of three of the top five sides in those matches
We are probably in as good form as Norwood, Sturt and Glenelg at present... that goes for Westies too

F*** applying that logic given we were within 1 pt of Centrals when the siren sounded at the end of the 2009 2nd semi final we can be considered premiers as we were almost as good as them

The reality is you were winless in the last five rounds the only team to be. There’s a strong argument that you ended the season as the worst team in the comp.

So genuine question do you want share your 2009 flag or acknowledge where you are really at in the 2022 season?

whufc wrote:Already hearing depth might be tested again with a few fringe types being open to other offers from country/ammos