SA Footy

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2015 7:46 pm**

Pronouncing someones name incorrect and linking that to the fall of the competition is going a bit over the top.

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2015 8:56 pm**

Dols wrote:
therisingblues wrote:
Pseudo wrote:
Dols wrote:In 2014 there were 10 games where attendances were greater than 4000, 7 of these games involved either Port or the Crows. So how will it be better without these two teams?

In 2015 the average attendance for 7 of the 8 sovereign clubs is increased by removing data involving interloper teams.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=40557&p=2018733#p2018733

Why doesn't Dols respond to this post?
Confucius say, "Cold hard fact, hard to deny."
put up the magpies home game stats!!!!!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2011: 3067
2012: 2752
2013: 2942
2014: 3258
2015: 2551

I could go back further, but 2015 is the lowest. It includes the lowest crowd involving Central (by 1000 and the lowest actual figure of all time); the 2nd lowest involving Glenelg; lowest involving North and lowest involving Sturt (except for an estimated crowd 100 years ago)

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2015 9:03 pm**

spell_check wrote:
Dols wrote:
therisingblues wrote:
Pseudo wrote:[quote="Dols"]In 2014 there were 10 games where attendances were greater than 4000, 7 of these games involved either Port or the Crows. So how will it be better without these two teams?

In 2015 the average attendance for 7 of the 8 sovereign clubs is increased by removing data involving interloper teams.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=40557&p=2018733#p2018733

Why doesn't Dols respond to this post?
Confucius say, "Cold hard fact, hard to deny."
put up the magpies home game stats!!!!!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2011: 3067
2012: 2752
2013: 2942
2014: 3258
2015: 2551

I could go back further, but 2015 is the lowest. It includes the lowest crowd involving Central (by 1000 and the lowest actual figure of all time); the 2nd lowest involving Glenelg; lowest involving North and lowest involving Sturt (except for an estimated crowd 100 years ago)[/quote]so still more than the majority of clubs[emoji106]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2015 9:48 pm**

: Untitled.png (367.63 KiB) Viewed 1309 times

Interesting, albeit short, discussion on twitter tonight

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2015 10:26 pm**

Not sure it is really relevant what they say.
I care what the rank and file SANFL members and supporters think about how their league is travelling.

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 7:27 am**

bomber14 wrote:
Untitled.png

Interesting, albeit short, discussion on twitter tonight

and where do the rest of your players play????????????????? WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 7:34 am**

Dols

Did you even understand what Spelly wrote?
That's the lowest ever average crowd figure for a SANFL season! Central recorded their lowest ever crowd. Glenelg and Sturt, their second lowest ever crowds. I don't understand how you could still believe that the majority of clubs have improved crowds after reading that.

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 7:50 am**

Because, like the SANFL Commission, he BELIEVES the lies.
The figures must be wrong!
There were 9K @ the 'Walker Game' & 6K @ the Clare 'Showdown', 40K went to the GF last year!
We are all delusional - the Competition has never been healthier! :roll:

Pfft...

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 8:14 am**

LPH wrote:Because, like the SANFL Commission, he BELIEVES the lies.
The figures must be wrong!
There were 9K @ the 'Walker Game' & 6K @ the Clare 'Showdown', 40K went to the GF last year!
We are all delusional - the Competition has never been healthier!
Pfft...

Now quickly look over there.....

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:34 am**

Don't you think it ironic some folk come into "The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread" to slag off posters for whinging about the AFL in the SANFL :roll:

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:48 am**

Booney wrote:
therisingblues wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Whilst there are many who dont want them in full stop there are just as many who aren't fussed if they are in just as long as they are never allowed to be successful. A premiership to either of them would be the definate death knell to the comp

Can't say I am aware of that "not fussed" category of people Jim.
I find we can group these people two ways.
1: People who want the AFL sides out, and prefer SANFL to AFL.
2: People who want them to stay, and prefer AFL to SANFL.
I am yet to meet ANYBODY who prefers SANFL to AFL who wants the reserves to stay in our league. I have met a few people who prefer AFL that understand and acknowledge how unreasonable the set up is, but want the reserves to stay because it is more beneficial to the Crows and the Power to have it that way. Usually however, the AFL mob are basically uneducated about the issues and very arrogant in their assertations that we accommodate their reserves. They're often just unable to understand how something that they think is good could be an imposition for others. If you'll excuse the analogy, it is very American.

What group do the people who attend SANFL every week now fall into then?

The ones that love their SANFL club and want to support their team. And just because they are attending doesn't mean they are "not fussed" that AFL Reserves are in the league.

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:48 am**

On Channel 9 News last night Tredrea said the SANFL Commission will be making a decision after the Grand Final as to whether AFL Reserves will be limited to 14 per game next year and whether Port will lose their home games.

Now is the time to let your club know what you want!

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 11:07 am**

cennals05 wrote:On Channel 9 News last night Tredrea said the SANFL Commission will be making a decision after the Grand Final as to whether AFL Reserves will be limited to 14 per game next year and whether Port will lose their home games.

Now is the time to let your club know what you want!

I'm pretty funkn sure My Club knows what I want

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 11:18 am**

CENTURION wrote:
cennals05 wrote:On Channel 9 News last night Tredrea said the SANFL Commission will be making a decision after the Grand Final as to whether AFL Reserves will be limited to 14 per game next year and whether Port will lose their home games.

Now is the time to let your club know what you want!

I'm pretty funkn sure My Club knows what I want

Ditto!!!!!

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 11:21 am**

Apachebulldog wrote:Nice Photo.

http://cdfc.com.au/assets/misc-on-groun ... 68585.jpeg

Considering we got told we wouldnt get it past the front door.

Seriously still surprised security didnt say anything.

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 11:33 am**

cennals05 wrote:On Channel 9 News last night Tredrea said the SANFL Commission will be making a decision after the Grand Final as to whether AFL Reserves will be limited to 14 per game next year and whether Port will lose their home games.

Now is the time to let your club know what you want!

Will the vote also dictate the future of the smears' reserves reserves side?

While well short of the Only Real Solution to this mess, it would be a step in the right direction. I would welcome the change as much as I would welcome the signs that the commission is starting to assert itself in matters pertaining to the interlopers.

A positive vote from the Glenelg delegate, along with a stated intent to further limit the interlopers, would be enough to see me resume membership of the club.

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 11:59 am**

Can't see Port losing their home games. I don't they should either.

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:03 pm**

DOnt forget to get the SANFL annual licence fee properly valued by independent interstate valuers.

WAFL getting $400K, VFL clubs can earn over $1 mill for 3-4 year affiliations with AFL Clubs.

We get $50K.

YOu want to hurt these pricks.

Go for their hip pockets.

They say they we cant afford it well.... bugger ye orf cos thats the value.

Not hard.

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:09 pm**

saintal wrote:Can't see Port losing their home games. I don't they should either.

Yeah agree, when they play at Alberton, cap em to 10 and go to Alberton and watch a nice percentage booster.

Posted: **Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:23 pm**

saintal wrote:Can't see Port losing their home games. I don't they should either.

Keep watching.

SANFL has go to learn the tactic of divide and conquer.

SA Footy

The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread