by Wedgie » Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:41 am
by sus » Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:58 am
Punk Rooster wrote:Now it appears that the holier than thou Eagles, who love to point out to the SANFL who's cheating the cap, have a net growth of players! Some of those players are on decent coin, perhaps, and they "lost" 2 players who weren't even on the books! (Watts & *chortle*Peel) So, perhaps the true count is +5? Now for a club with a holier than thou attitude (I've said it twice to reinforce what hypocrites they are), perhaps shifting the blame away from their own nest, so as to have some breathing space? Let's face it, they ain't gonna win a flag any other way!Wedgie wrote:PS Well done Punky, at least you created a topic that is obviously of interest despite me not agreeing with it. Unlike the trolls who just abuse people's opinions/posts while not coming up with interesting topics of their own. It may have been a point not agreed with you made but at least you have more intelligence than those who can only put down others views with mindless insults without presenting intelligent throught provoking topics of interest themselves. Keep up the good work punky!
Honestly guys, if you're just here to put others down whilst not being prepared to post a topic yourselves that make attract criticism or conversation then go back to where you came from.
by Wedgie » Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:11 pm
sus wrote:
Common Wedgie. Please!
1. "....created a topic that is obviously of interest". The salary cap topic has been done to death on this forum. We didnt need another thread on it!
2. "....Unlike the trolls who just abuse people's opinions/posts while not coming up with interesting topics of their own". Punky's post smack sof trolling too!
3. "....have more intelligence than those who can only put down others views with mindless insults without presenting intelligent throught provoking topics of interest themselves." RandB summed it up "Probably the dumbest method of assessing each club's salary cap anyone's put up so far."
sus wrote:Is Punky your love child???![]()
![]()
sus wrote:In all seriousness though I absolutely agree with your thoughts in the latter posts about not allowing threads to degenerate into kindergarten debate.
by JK » Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:22 pm
by doggies4eva » Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:30 pm
Wedgie wrote:
Supporter A: Norwood Suck
Supporter B: You're a dickhead, your team sucks more.
Supporter C: You're a bigger dickhead and your team sucks more.
Supporter A: Takes one to know one
.
by Wedgie » Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:31 pm
doggies4eva wrote:Wedgie wrote:
Supporter A: Norwood Suck
Supporter B: You're a dickhead, your team sucks more.
Supporter C: You're a bigger dickhead and your team sucks more.
Supporter A: Takes one to know one
.
Wedgie,
I think supporter A has a fair point.
by stan » Tue Jan 24, 2006 3:43 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:For all the bleating about "Salary Caps" let's assess the following....
Central Districts (player count) -1
Glenelg -5
North Adelaide -3
Norwood neutral
Port Adelaide -4
South Adelaide -2
Sturt -2
West Adelaide -6
Woodville-West Torrens +3
Now it appears that the holier than thou Eagles, who love to point out to the SANFL who's cheating the cap, have a net growth of players! Some of those players are on decent coin, perhaps, and they "lost" 2 players who weren't even on the books! (Watts & *chortle*Peel) So, perhaps the true count is +5? Now for a club with a holier than thou attitude (I've said it twice to reinforce what hypocrites they are), perhaps shifting the blame away from their own nest, so as to have some breathing space? Let's face it, they ain't gonna win a flag any other way!
by doggies4eva » Tue Jan 24, 2006 4:11 pm
by drebin » Tue Jan 24, 2006 4:18 pm
by stan » Tue Jan 24, 2006 4:27 pm
doggies4eva wrote:My knowledge of player salaries suggests that the difference between a rookies pay and that of an established champion is a factor of more than 10. That makes the counting of players on and off a list a futile exercise unless they are more or less the same market value.
by Mickyj » Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:21 pm
drebin wrote:Well some CEO's think it is ironic that little Johnny K whinges at the League table (and in the press from time to time) about other clubs re salary caps, poaching etc but cannot take any criticism when other clubs point out the number of players employed directly by the Eagles or via their Major sponsor plus the Eagles back door methods to speak to certain players under contract: cue - a current North league player approached during the finals by the Eagles but you didn't hear a public whinge from North nor was it mentioned at the SANFL table either. The Eagles will be under scrutiny like everyone else!
by LBJ8 » Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:48 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:For all the bleating about "Salary Caps" let's assess the following....
Central Districts (player count) -1
Glenelg -5
North Adelaide -3
Norwood neutral
Port Adelaide -4
South Adelaide -2
Sturt -2
West Adelaide -6
Woodville-West Torrens +3
Now it appears that the holier than thou Eagles, who love to point out to the SANFL who's cheating the cap, have a net growth of players! Some of those players are on decent coin, perhaps, and they "lost" 2 players who weren't even on the books! (Watts & *chortle*Peel) So, perhaps the true count is +5? Now for a club with a holier than thou attitude (I've said it twice to reinforce what hypocrites they are), perhaps shifting the blame away from their own nest, so as to have some breathing space? Let's face it, they ain't gonna win a flag any other way!
by ORDoubleBlues » Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:44 pm
Mickyj wrote:Perhaps it was tit for tat seeing North approached Toia during the season ? then again he wasnt much of a loss was he
by JK » Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:45 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:46 pm
ORDoubleBlues wrote:Mickyj wrote:Perhaps it was tit for tat seeing North approached Toia during the season ? then again he wasnt much of a loss was he
I thought the story went something along the lines of Fuller encouraging Toia to retire?
Let's face it, it would have saved the Eagles some money if he had.
by Dogmatic » Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:10 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:33 pm
LBJ23 24th January 2005 wrote:That would have to be one of the dumbest posts i've seen. Face it you guys are paying over the cap, even if you aren't doing it South Adelaide style, even Port Adelaide people with brains admit that they look to be over the cap this year, so far all of the Roosters supporters are in denial, get your hands off it.
Wedgie 16th January 2005 wrote:If that's the case then my opinion would be that North are in the shit.
by am Bays » Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:23 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:29 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Sorry it is way too obvious not to take the opportunity.......
Isn't De Nile a river in Egypt......
Yuk Yuk Yuk......
by arcadefire » Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:02 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |