by dedja » Sat May 30, 2009 11:09 pm
by Grahaml » Sun May 31, 2009 12:18 am
by dedja » Sun May 31, 2009 12:23 am
Grahaml wrote: 2 vital points, given other finals aspirants may lose points all their points to Centrals for the Eagles to be 1-1 after 2, other sides will go 0-2 you'd think. Could be a very important factor when it comes down to deciding the top 3 and even the top 5.
by Aerie » Sun May 31, 2009 12:29 am
by cd » Sun May 31, 2009 1:11 am
by lesthemechanic » Sun May 31, 2009 8:19 am
dedja wrote:Grahaml wrote: 2 vital points, given other finals aspirants may lose points all their points to Centrals for the Eagles to be 1-1 after 2, other sides will go 0-2 you'd think. Could be a very important factor when it comes down to deciding the top 3 and even the top 5.
Come again???
by purch » Sun May 31, 2009 9:07 am
lesthemechanic wrote:dedja wrote:Grahaml wrote: 2 vital points, given other finals aspirants may lose points all their points to Centrals for the Eagles to be 1-1 after 2, other sides will go 0-2 you'd think. Could be a very important factor when it comes down to deciding the top 3 and even the top 5.
Come again???
Hope the Dogs players have that attitude, because that will trip them up more than once more this season.
by Mickyj » Sun May 31, 2009 9:14 am
dedja wrote:Grahaml wrote: 2 vital points, given other finals aspirants may lose points all their points to Centrals for the Eagles to be 1-1 after 2, other sides will go 0-2 you'd think. Could be a very important factor when it comes down to deciding the top 3 and even the top 5.
Come again???
by Mickyj » Sun May 31, 2009 9:18 am
Grahaml wrote:Anyway, well played to the Eagles in the last 15 minutes when the game was up for grabs. Thought nobody deserved it until then.
by Mickyj » Sun May 31, 2009 9:20 am
Wedgie wrote:Dogsbody wrote:The shift of McGregor up forward was the Midas touch, nuff said.
Let's just say after his effort against North in winning a game off his own boot in one quarter it wasn't rocket science on Ron Fuller's behalf!
by FlyingHigh » Sun May 31, 2009 9:29 am
Grahaml wrote:Well, thought for the first 3 quarters the dogs were the better side in the contests, but skills and turnovers killed us. Then in the last, instead of the skills coming good the Eagles started to win those contests and that was the difference. I thought it was a terrible display by the dogs. Stacks of turnovers, plenty of dropped marks (aside from the ones in the stats, Schell would normally have taken a few more) and some goals missed we should have done better one. Not sure the Eagles will take much more than the 2 points away from the game. Surely they won't be thinking that standard will be good enough, but perhaps they will be happy to get some personnel back and will be looking for improvement along the same lines as the dogs.
Was good to see Hayes and Callinan back, even if neither looked sharp. Schell needs a fair bit more footy before he's back to his best. Hopefully Williams and Griffin recover in time for next week, thereafter they should get a decent break with the bye, unless Griffin plays AFL (hard to imagine given how sore he looked late today though). We missed M. Westhoff terribly today so hopefully that sounds a warning that we're possibly a little too reliant on AFL players to fill a key forward post. Danny Havelberg's return appears vital.
Anyway, well played to the Eagles in the last 15 minutes when the game was up for grabs. Thought nobody deserved it until then, but McGregor in particular really stepped up when needed. 2 vital points, given other finals aspirants may lose points all their points to Centrals for the Eagles to be 1-1 after 2, other sides will go 0-2 you'd think. Could be a very important factor when it comes down to deciding the top 3 and even the top 5.
by Mickyj » Sun May 31, 2009 10:11 am
FlyingHigh wrote:
Would generally agree with that GL, other than I think you need to give the Eagles credit for their desire to stay in the contest and have a scrap which must have been a big turn around from the last couple of weeks.
by centrecirclelegend » Sun May 31, 2009 10:16 am
by SnappyTom » Sun May 31, 2009 10:48 am
by MightyEagles » Sun May 31, 2009 11:12 am
by whufc » Sun May 31, 2009 11:20 am
by udogs01 » Sun May 31, 2009 11:47 am
by purch » Sun May 31, 2009 11:59 am
whufc wrote:I would imagine Sturt would start the game favourites.
by Mickyj » Sun May 31, 2009 12:19 pm
womble wrote:2027 at woodville oval !!
Where were you eagle fans...playing the top team and this is all you can manage.
About 500 eagle fans the rest would have been dogs fans.
PS...Dogs were pathetic congrats to the Eagles for taking advantage of that.
by Mickyj » Sun May 31, 2009 12:20 pm
SnappyTom wrote:Well done to the Eagles on the win. You were hungrier in the final stanza, and needed the win that much more.
The standard of the game, however, left a lot to be desired. One of the worse games from a skill perspective I've seen in the last ten seasons. Only the closeness of the contest made it half a spectacle, and were were sh1te to say the least.
ST...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |