I even still have the manuscript of that interview I did with Cornes. Fancy saying that about the club you're coaching though..
Touche on the D.Smith thing

by Footy Chick » Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:17 pm
by nickname » Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:56 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:06 pm
by beenreal » Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:09 pm
UK Fan wrote:What I dont understand is how did we get involved.
Port Power are deliberatly running severely over budget. What has that got to do with the 9 SANFL clubs and the SANFL comp at all.
Its not our fault 1 club is to proud to stick to a budget.
Any chance the AFl clubs could actually thank the SANFl for what we have sacrificed for them over the last 18 years. Any gratitude at all ????
Nope just going to continue to complain and demanding more.
So glad we entered this failed experiment that is the afl.
Best of luck Port . Im sure crowds will go thru the roof now gold coast and west syndey are joining.![]()
![]()
by Dogwatcher » Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:12 pm
by sjt » Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:13 pm
Pseudo wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Then when it all went pair shaped and we had to come up with a team quick smart, they appointed the losing grand final coach over the winning grand final coach
Or, without the anti-Glenelg spin, a coach with a proven record at achieving success with high-level composite teams (i.e. State Of Origin), over a bloke whose record outside of his SANFL club was average at best.I mean, Allan Bartlett... WTF were they thinking?
Probably thinking much the same as when they picked Darren Smith.
by Big Phil » Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:14 pm
nickname wrote:I'd like to think someone at the SANFL with a passion for the competition would feel an attack on the competition warranted a response.
SANFL Web Site wrote:The Port Adelaide Magpies Football Club wishes to assure all its members and supporters as well as SANFL League Football supporters that it will not “be forced to fall on its own sword” for the so-called betterment of the game in South Australia. There has been a great deal of speculation throughout the media over the last week surrounding the Power’s financial challenges, stadium deals and the role of the SANFL and indeed the SANFL Clubs in this.
The future prosperity of the SANFL competition, stadium deals for the two AFL Clubs and indeed the Power’s financial challenges are all complex issues, but there is one thing that is certain, the Magpies no longer continuing in the SANFL is not going to solve any of these issues. In 1997, when the Power entered the AFL, the SANFL knew that Port Adelaide needed to continue in the competition to ensure it remained strong and this has been proven. As difficult as it has been for the Magpies in the SANFL (both on and off the field), the club still holds the highest average and aggregate attendances in the SANFL competition between 1997 to 2008. When you consider that the Club has not had the success on field it would desire since 2000, it highlights the significance of this fact and as the Club rebuilds and becomes successful on field again, there is probably no club in the competition with more upside potential in terms of attendances. The Club has the highest levels of membership and sponsorship in the SANFL and this is currently up by 20% on the same time last year, belying the commonly held view that the Club is on the downward trend.
From a financial sense the Club has some challenges at the moment, but this is no different any other business in the current climate. Our challenges are somewhat unique in the SANFL and this is largely because in 1997 the Club virtually had to start from scratch again. In 2005 the Club purchased the Prince of Wales Hotel at Queenstown and this investment has been a very positive one for the football club. The Club did however have to borrow significant funds to make this purchase but over time our financial position will improve as we effectively own a commercial hotel on a main road in a growth area of Adelaide, and because it is a hotel it can be sold which is unlike most other clubs who effectively cannot sell their licensed venues. This is not to say we would sell, but it highlights that over time the value of our asset will grow and ultimately provide greater returns to the Club. In very simple terms, our asset is now worth nearly $4m, and we have debts of around $2m, so our long term financial viability is secure as long as we maintain and develop our hotel investment.
In 2008, the Club lost $240,000 and this was largely due to a significant downturn in gaming at the Prince of Wales Hotel. This was consistent with the industry in 2008 and was a major factor behind most SANFL Club financial results. It was not because of an overspending football department like some would like us to believe, in fact most SANFL football clubs rely on largely volunteer support across all levels of the Club. We have people who spend 300 to 400 hours a year at the club and receive a $250 honorarium for their considerable efforts and commitment. To our valuable coaches and support staff, I apologize the inference of “over expanding football departments” and sincerely thank them for the considerable time and commitment they put into our football club, for little or no financial gain.
The Club addressed these challenges early and has made some significant changes across the business, and pleasingly indicators for 2009 so far are ahead of budget. On the income side of things, our gaming revenue is 30% up on last year and membership revenue is 20% up whilst the costs savings that were implemented in the latter part of 2008 see total expenditure in the football club already nearly $80,000 less than last year.
The answers to a recent article questioning the continuation of the Magpies in the SANFL, the AFL Club and AAMI Stadium challenges do not lie with the Magpies rolling over. The Club’s Creed opens up by saying that “we accept the heritage that the players and administrators before us have passed down, and in doing so we do not intend to rest in idleness but shall strive with all our power to further this club’s unexcelled achievements.” That statement is as relevant now as it has ever been here at the Magpies, and the current generation of players, administrators, coaches and support staff at the Magpies carry that responsibility with a genuine sense of purpose and belief. This club has always been about looking forward and setting out to achieve our goals and now is no different, no matter what people on the outside might choose to think.
MATTHEW RICHARDSON - CEO
by silent hour » Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:21 pm
dash61 wrote:I think we need the "Port Adelaide Magpies", the club with the outstanding history in the SANFL that funny enough wore the Port Adelaide Football Club jumper yesterday that we all love to hate and that play "THEIR HOME GAMES AT ALBERTON.
The Power or hang on this month its the club with the 130 years tradition as their promotions department call them are a side still wet behind the ears in the AFL could and should move to Adelaide Oval by Chris McDermotts comments.
Well Chris let them move there and let the Port Magpies continue to play at Alberton and wear the prison bar jumper or whatever they call it as they have for years and be the side we all love to hate.
PS I have a soft spot for the Magpies after the way the Power have treated them
by beenreal » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:20 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:06 am
by UK Fan » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:28 am
beenreal wrote:UK Fan wrote:What I dont understand is how did we get involved.
Port Power are deliberatly running severely over budget. What has that got to do with the 9 SANFL clubs and the SANFL comp at all.
Its not our fault 1 club is to proud to stick to a budget.
Any chance the AFl clubs could actually thank the SANFl for what we have sacrificed for them over the last 18 years. Any gratitude at all ????
Nope just going to continue to complain and demanding more.
So glad we entered this failed experiment that is the afl.
Best of luck Port . Im sure crowds will go thru the roof now gold coast and west syndey are joining.![]()
![]()
Now I've read everything. A Centrals fan talking about sticking to a budget. Next you'll be talking about the salary cap..... whoops, Shhhhh
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Ronnie » Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:33 pm
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:55 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:For a start, the Crows should move to Adelaide Oval and Port take over Football Park, but the Glenelg mafia, who actually created the Crows, would never let that happen
by panthers 2008 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:16 pm
by Psyber » Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:48 pm
by am Bays » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:38 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:For a start, the Crows should move to Adelaide Oval and Port take over Football Park, but the Glenelg mafia, who actually created the Crows, would never let that happen
by sjt » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:14 pm
by JK » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:21 pm
by Il Duce » Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:14 pm
Columbo wrote:For those of us who were younger at the time of Port's original attempt for entry to the AFL in 1990 (i was 14 and remember all the fuss and the end result but not all the details) what was the plan?
Did the Magpies plan to enter the AFL and abandon the local comp altogether?
or
Was the plan to have a team in the AFL and SANFL, similar to what we have at the moment?
by ORDoubleBlues » Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:03 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |