

by CENTURION » Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:46 am
by CUTTERMAN » Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:17 am
by Dirko » Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:22 am
by Barto » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:05 am
by am Bays » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:11 am
Barto wrote:This thread is now about what a socially inept toss pot Sam Rudolph is for not understanding that handshakes are for after the game
by Footy Smart » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:22 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:sammy would have made a good full forward for sturt yesterday
numerous times as the ball went inside sturts forward 50 sammy was leading to the ball like a full forward with chambo trailing behind.
by Rucciangelo » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:28 am
by sjt » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:30 am
by Bluedemon » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:32 am
stampy wrote:sooky la la didnt let me down when he refused to shake hands with his nemisis Sammy Rudolph before the game today, shame on you you bad sport branty pooh, you got what you deserved, an absolute bath by the best fullback in the comp. Chambers is a tool
by am Bays » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:35 am
Footy Smart wrote:I pose this question and in no way would it have changed the results, but what was your perspective of the standard of umpiring in the game???? IMO opinion very inconsistant and does anyone have the official free kick count????
by Dirko » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:36 am
Punk Rooster wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Next year when we'll play Sturt rather than shake hands we'll get Sammy to give Chambo a cake of soap and towel so that he can bath him properly....
i'm sure most [male] Glenelg supporters would enjoy this show also....
by Psyber » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:39 am
by Punk Rooster » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:40 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by smac » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:41 am
Punk Rooster wrote:hey, all the anti-North stuff is very boring too, but what can you do?
by leftlegger » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:53 am
by Dirko » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:54 am
leftlegger wrote:Jeez if i had the power to delete this thread, i'd do it right now.
FFS, you dont NEED to shake hands before a game.
Sure Sammy destroyed Chambo (again) but really it was the pressure from the midfield that truly snuffed out the delivery.
How about some positive posting Stampy.
We're in a fuggin GF!!!!!
YOU BLOODY BEAUTY!
GO TIGES! ITS TIME!!
by Barto » Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:08 am
smac wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:hey, all the anti-North stuff is very boring too, but what can you do?
Not pay it forward.
by Footy Smart » Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:09 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Footy Smart wrote:I pose this question and in no way would it have changed the results, but what was your perspective of the standard of umpiring in the game???? IMO opinion very inconsistant and does anyone have the official free kick count????
FS
This won't surprise you, I thought the umpiring was very consistant yesterday players in front positin got rewarded with a free kick if it was there and if players had prior opportunity and where tackled (allbeit briefly e.g Panozzo in teh2nd qtr) they got pinged.
When Sturt got first to the footy late in teh 2nd qtr they got free kicks and in the third qtr when they had the footy i.e were first they got the run of the umpiring. Fair enough they were first to the footy.
I wont say they were perfect I mean in the third qtr after Sturt got their two goals we brought the ball into our fifty to a leading Kirkby he was being held as he led (you could see his jumper stretch most obvious free of the day I thought and play on was the call...)
So all in all like last week when Centrals got the run of the umpiring (justifiably) it was the team first to the footy that got rewarded.
Good umpiring IMO particularly from Williams.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |