Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby SDK » Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:31 pm

It appeared to all but Norwood supporters that Port just had to turn up to win. Wrong !
Any Norwood /Port game..anywhere...anytime....any situation....is ALWAYS 50/50 !

Great game of football and the reason I go to watch this great game of ours. Its why there is no better football than Norwood/Port games.
SDK
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 51 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby mal » Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:35 pm

WALKER
One of the slickest handballers going around as well

I saw another NW footballer with the same uncanny ability to kick goals
He looked laconic as well but just ooooooozed of talent
Mark Jones
This guy kicked about 60 goals in a season of footy as well but injuries and ultimately thewomen/grog/and TAB took over too many of his priorities
Mark Jones last seen Ingle Farm TAB

I thought Mark would be an AFL star but was wrong
Im sure Taylor Walker will be a star

For those worried about his defensive skills, he will learn that, at the moment who cares hes more value kicking goals then chasing defenders
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30243
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2112 times
Been liked: 2149 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby NFC » Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:59 pm

I kind of saw what happened between Hargraves and Kite, looked like he just slung him down with all his strength but it was obviously more than that, must have got him in the jaw or something because he didn’t hit the ground hard, he was gone before he hit the deck.

As for the game, WOW! Great game of footy, brilliant result. Great, great win.

Walker is a freakish talent. Just amazing. Gallagher inspirational, Zorzi, Doyle, Pup, Trotter, all good, as were the others. Great team performance.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby Macca19 » Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:34 pm

heater31 wrote:
Aerie wrote:I was in the Bradman Stand and didn't see what happened. No Norwood players remonstrated with any of the Port players. It must have happened as the ball was sailing way over all of their heads through for the goal. Maybe a freak accident? Hopefully he is alright for next week - looks a good young player running out the backlines.


Aaron Kite has copped one fair on the chops all because the young lad had given his opponent a bath.


He spent all of about 5 minutes on Hargraves for the day. He had three goals kicked on him.
Macca19
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:54 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 10 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby bulldogproud » Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:50 pm

Congratulations to Norwood on their win today. Hopefully set the scene for six great matches in this finals series. Commiserations to Port but I think they did take a small step forward this year.
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:30 am

Pseudo wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:
topsywaldron wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:When Norwood get it right and play direct, they can look a good side.


Also check out the handball stats in the paper, we had about fifty less than Port. IMHO we play our best footy when we give ourselves less chance to cock it up.


Absolutely Topsy. It annoys me when we continually chip wide all the time, especially across the half forward line. Today we rarely did it. Maybe the long and narrow shape of Adelaide Oval straightens us up. Just a theory.


Narrower than the Parade? :?


The SHAPE of the ground. Think about it. It's a lot longer than Norwood, and in comparison to its length, it's is more narrow. Makes you adopt a more direct style of football.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby Booney » Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:19 am

Taylor Walker was the difference. Coupled with Port's overwhelming hunger to use Jeremy Clayton to go forward,even when he was covered left Noroowd deserved winners.

That Walker is something special,isnt he? Looks almost lazy at times,but that,that is the sign of a genuine star,they look lazy and slow but have all the time in the world.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61806
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8229 times
Been liked: 11959 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby HeartBeatsTrue » Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:27 am

The main differences I saw between the 2 teams was this.

When the ball was in dispute, Port worried more about the man with physical tactics rather than the pill. Norwood attacked the footy and got their just reward. Someone has to tell Tim Ginever what worked in the 90s doesnt apply to today's football.

Doyle played smarter in the ruck. Again the Port ruckman was more worried about jumping on Doyle's shoulders rather than just try and tap the ball.

Walker. He's a superstar, but not the difference. Port have 2 very experienced forwards and could have kicked at least 7 between them if the ball went inside 50 more often, and the great job of Norwood's defence in Zorzi, Dawes, Duigan (til he got injured), Kite (til he got decked :evil: ) and Vlatko (stood up in the last qtr when sent back there)

From memory, the stats saw Norwood had a lot more inside 50s, and Port had a lot more handballs. Suggesting Norwood played a lot more direct than they normally do.
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:24 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Pooraka

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby mal » Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:27 am

Booney wrote:Taylor Walker was the difference. Coupled with Port's overwhelming hunger to use Jeremy Clayton to go forward,even when he was covered left Noroowd deserved winners.

That Walker is something special,isnt he? Looks almost lazy at times,but that,that is the sign of a genuine star,they look lazy and slow but have all the time in the world.


Taylor Walker the re-incarnation of Peter Hudson ?
Hudson looked lazy slow laconic etc and what a career he ended up having for Hawthorn
The way WALKER moves reminds me so much of Huddo
Against SA at Carlunga I saw WALKER double back and losing his opponent a few times
Thats what HUDSON did as well
Both are marvellous readers of the game

IF WALKER is 58.47% as good as HUDSON he will make the grade in the AFL
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30243
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2112 times
Been liked: 2149 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby am Bays » Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:38 am

Booney wrote:Taylor Walker was the difference. Coupled with Port's overwhelming hunger to use Jeremy Clayton to go forward,even when he was covered left Noroowd deserved winners.

That Walker is something special,isnt he? Looks almost lazy at times,but that,that is the sign of a genuine star,they look lazy and slow but have all the time in the world.


And to think a former poster on here suggested that he only got drafted because he was NSW scholarship player, not because he could play...

Mind you he is still a young player with that dreaded "P" word hanging over his head, next year in the AFL he'll get the opportunity to get rid of that for his sake.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19775
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby Booney » Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:46 am

HeartBeatsTrue wrote:The main differences I saw between the 2 teams was this.

When the ball was in dispute, Port worried more about the man with physical tactics rather than the pill. Norwood attacked the footy and got their just reward. Someone has to tell Tim Ginever what worked in the 90s doesnt apply to today's football.



Did you stay and watch Central play if so, how different is their game style to the teams Ginever played in that dominated the competition?

Hard at the body and the ball wins games,pehaps Port did go more body than ball but this was an indication the Summerton,Dolling,Clayton and Elstone's of the world knew they were going to be out paced and tried to get the younger Norwood bodies off the line of the ball and at times this worked,but the pace of Gallagher and co did the real damage.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61806
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8229 times
Been liked: 11959 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:48 am

fester69 wrote:
mal wrote:Norwoods first win in a final at Adelaide Oval since 1962
FINALS
HILL1 WIN
0 LOSSES :wink:

FINALS
GINEVER 0 WINS
2 LOSSES

HEAD TO HEAD
HILL 3
GINEVER 6

Can anyone tell me what Hargreaves did to Kite in the Last qtr ?



Sorry Mal you're wrong. We won the 1st Semi against the Eagles in 2002 at Adelaide Oval.


Er...wasn't that match at Football Park?

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby am Bays » Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:51 am

HeartBeatsTrue wrote:
When the ball was in dispute, Port worried more about the man with physical tactics rather than the pill. Norwood attacked the footy and got their just reward. Someone has to tell Tim Ginever what worked in the 90s doesnt apply to today's football.



Disagree HBT when Port domianted in the 90s as per Centrals in the 00s Port went hard at the Ball and the Body (in that order). The trick to playing Port and Centrals is to do what they do best attack the Ball and the body (in that order) harder than what they do. Yesterday you did it to Port Sturt didn't do that to Centrals.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19775
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby Booney » Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:59 am

Great minds Tassie,great minds....
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61806
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8229 times
Been liked: 11959 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Sep 15, 2008 10:20 am

Hearts can say what he likes cos winners are grinners Booney. :lol:

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby mal » Mon Sep 15, 2008 10:24 am

BOONEY/REB/HEARTS BEAT TRUE
Stop this incessive bickering please
The reason why NW won and the defining point was the land invasion when CHAMBO got his 100th
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30243
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2112 times
Been liked: 2149 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby HeartBeatsTrue » Mon Sep 15, 2008 10:25 am

Oh well agree to disagree Boon and Tas.

The Port I remember used to rough up the opposition early and intimidate.

Watched last qtr of Centrals game. Saw more getting the footy rather than worrying about the opposition.
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:24 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Pooraka

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Sep 15, 2008 10:28 am

mal wrote:BOONEY/REB/HEARTS BEAT TRUE
Stop this incessive bickering please
The reason why NW won and the defining point was the land invasion when CHAMBO got his 100th


YOU SILLY MAN! :?
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby JK » Mon Sep 15, 2008 10:40 am

Booney wrote:Hard at the body and the ball wins games,pehaps Port did go more body than ball but this was an indication the Summerton,Dolling,Clayton and Elstone's of the world knew they were going to be out paced and tried to get the younger Norwood bodies off the line of the ball and at times this worked,but the pace of Gallagher and co did the real damage.


I gotta agree with that, spot on IMHO.

I thought the size of our kids would really hurt us yesterday, but all of them put their bodies on the line and played couragous disciplined footy ... I still think Port would have run over us if we'd ducked back into our shells as we have so often in recent years, but thankfully we continued to play in the same manner which set our lead up, and kept the scoreboard ticking over at vital times.

Commiserations to Port, I think they left themselves too much to do in the last 10 weeks of the year and it took it's toll, but the old enemy will always have the world of respect from this
Legs supporter.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Elimnation Final Norwood v Port Review Thread

Postby Hodges 153! » Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:11 am

Constance_Perm wrote:Commiserations to Port, I think they left themselves too much to do in the last 10 weeks of the year and it took it's toll, but the old enemy will always have the world of respect from this
Legs supporter.


Yep, they looked tired near the end.

Side note: It is absolutely ridiculous that both teams have to push their way through the crowd to get off the ground after the game.

With all the concern over crowd invasions after the kicking of a 100th goal, this is an open invitation for an idiot in the crowd to cause an incident.

Hopefully will be rectified with the re-development of the western side.

(Alternative solution - make sure you are playing in the late game I guess! :wink:)
Hodges 153!
Rookie
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 2:05 pm
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 3 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |