SA Footy

Don't Sturt have a different method of appointing Board members? My recollection is that the members have very little say in who's on the Board.

dedja wrote:Glenelg have had a massive turnaround and will get close to breaking even.

dedja wrote:Glenelg results are out, $243K loss in 2014

I'll have to apologise to Dedja here. This atrocious result puts paid to my notion that the Bays would massage their figures in an attempt to put a positive spin on the entry of the two AFL reserves teams.

topsywaldron wrote:Don't Sturt have a different method of appointing Board members? My recollection is that the members have very little say in who's on the Board.

No, Topsy. There are four Board members who are elected by the membership. These are two year terms, but, they are staggered terms, much like the Senate elections. Two of these elected positions are renewed every year and nominations are called for prior to the AGM. A further Board position comes from the Vice Presidents group. Other Board positions are co-opted onto the Board depending on the expertise needed. e.g, Football, Finance, Junior Football and Marketing & Fundraising. As with most SANFL clubs there is always a lack of nominations from the membership, so, the incumbent member elected members have pretty much just rolled over for the last decade. Hope that clears it up for you.

Thanks.

knowledge wrote:

topsywaldron wrote:Don't Sturt have a different method of appointing Board members? My recollection is that the members have very little say in who's on the Board.

No, Topsy. There are four Board members who are elected by the membership. These are two year terms, but, they are staggered terms, much like the Senate elections. Two of these elected positions are renewed every year and nominations are called for prior to the AGM. A further Board position comes from the Vice Presidents group. Other Board positions are co-opted onto the Board depending on the expertise needed. e.g, Football, Finance, Junior Football and Marketing & Fundraising. As with most SANFL clubs there is always a lack of nominations from the membership, so, the incumbent member elected members have pretty much just rolled over for the last decade. Hope that clears it up for you.

Are you saying members vote Knowledge ?

Chris Threadgold is nominating I heard .

Bounce of the ball wrote:

knowledge wrote:

topsywaldron wrote:Don't Sturt have a different method of appointing Board members? My recollection is that the members have very little say in who's on the Board.

No, Topsy. There are four Board members who are elected by the membership. These are two year terms, but, they are staggered terms, much like the Senate elections. Two of these elected positions are renewed every year and nominations are called for prior to the AGM. A further Board position comes from the Vice Presidents group. Other Board positions are co-opted onto the Board depending on the expertise needed. e.g, Football, Finance, Junior Football and Marketing & Fundraising. As with most SANFL clubs there is always a lack of nominations from the membership, so, the incumbent member elected members have pretty much just rolled over for the last decade. Hope that clears it up for you.

Are you saying members vote Knowledge ?

Chris Threadgold is nominating I heard .

Yes, members vote if there are more than two nominations.

Hearing that the premiers have had to cut staff from their senior coaching group in order to cut expenditure. Geez if the 3 x premiers are going rough financially the whole comp might be in trouble.

Not the only club cutting coaching staff, either.

Excellent result by Sturt. A much needed piece of good news from a SANFL club.

Clearly the NAFC posting a $315k profit is not good news?

on the rails wrote:Clearly the NAFC posting a $315k profit is not good news?

A fantastic return in today's climate...

Well done, Roosters...

davesa wrote:Hearing that the premiers have had to cut staff from their senior coaching group in order to cut expenditure. Geez if the 3 x premiers are going rough financially the whole comp might be in trouble.

Far from going rough financially.
Reckon we are in a pretty good position, you can always make cuts though, perhaps the club though some money was been wasted.

Jim05 wrote:

davesa wrote:Hearing that the premiers have had to cut staff from their senior coaching group in order to cut expenditure. Geez if the 3 x premiers are going rough financially the whole comp might be in trouble.

Far from going rough financially.
Reckon we are in a pretty good position, you can always make cuts though, perhaps the club though some money was been wasted.

I wish my mob would waste some money and win one premiership let alone three.

Come on RIG North spends plenty on on and off field support except you can't spend on the one thing we need no matter how much $$$ you have - can't buy a winning non mediocre culture - we are stuck with middle of the road results given it has littered our path for more than 100 years!

Jim05 wrote:

davesa wrote:Hearing that the premiers have had to cut staff from their senior coaching group in order to cut expenditure. Geez if the 3 x premiers are going rough financially the whole comp might be in trouble.

Far from going rough financially.
Reckon we are in a pretty good position, you can always make cuts though, perhaps the club though some money was been wasted.

Who were the coaching member(s) cut?

Sorry mate that I didnt post about the North profit. Good news as well. Well done to North as well. It is good to see SANFL clubs doing well considering its a very slow economy at the moment.

Big Phil wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

davesa wrote:Hearing that the premiers have had to cut staff from their senior coaching group in order to cut expenditure. Geez if the 3 x premiers are going rough financially the whole comp might be in trouble.

Far from going rough financially.
Reckon we are in a pretty good position, you can always make cuts though, perhaps the club though some money was been wasted.

Who were the coaching member(s) cut?

Runner
Opposition analyst
Reserves coach

davesa wrote:

Big Phil wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

davesa wrote:Hearing that the premiers have had to cut staff from their senior coaching group in order to cut expenditure. Geez if the 3 x premiers are going rough financially the whole comp might be in trouble.

Far from going rough financially.
Reckon we are in a pretty good position, you can always make cuts though, perhaps the club though some money was been wasted.

Who were the coaching member(s) cut?

Runner
Opposition analyst
Reserves coach

McLeod wasn't cut

davesa wrote:

Big Phil wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

davesa wrote:Hearing that the premiers have had to cut staff from their senior coaching group in order to cut expenditure. Geez if the 3 x premiers are going rough financially the whole comp might be in trouble.

Far from going rough financially.
Reckon we are in a pretty good position, you can always make cuts though, perhaps the club though some money was been wasted.

Who were the coaching member(s) cut?

Runner
Opposition analyst
Reserves coach

So they're not going to have a Runner or Reserves Coach???

on the rails wrote:Clearly the NAFC posting a $315k profit is not good news?

Great! I can hear it now at the AGM this year. WITH THE INTRODUCTION OF THE 2 AFL TEAMS, WE ARE PROUD TO SAY THE CLUB HAS MADE A SIGNIFICANT PROFIT ON PREVIOUS YEARS. All hail Sir Bodan jawhisky