Page 13 of 18

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:49 pm
by Pseudo
GWW wrote:How embarrassing - I wonder if Nigel Smart "cares" about this latest development.

Didja ever notice how that bloke's name is an oxymoron?

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:51 pm
by Pseudo
Macca19 wrote:I dont think its regoked yet but f it is, whicker needs to fall on his sword immediately given his dramatic support of this yesterday

Larry, Moe and Curly - sorry, I meant Whicker, Trigg and Olsen - all should have been given the arse last year. I have more moral fibre in my sphincter than those three clowns in entirety.

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:12 pm
by dedja
I suppose there'll be a Royal Commission now ...

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:24 pm
by redden whites
Is there anyone in the admin of that club that has not been a public laughing stock.

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:42 pm
by Apachebulldog
Get rid of Olsen there has been nothing but controversy since this Klown was appointed.

I also reckon sack Triggy as he did not have the balls to come out with this concept and he also set Smart up ??????

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:51 pm
by Squids
Yeah where is Triggy?

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:52 pm
by kickinit
Apachebulldog wrote:Get rid of Olsen there has been nothing but controversy since this Klown was appointed.

I also reckon sack Triggy as he did not have the balls to come out with this concept and he also set Smart up ??????


he probably did it to take the heat of himself. Also notice how their 2 captains where a no show. When does a club make a "huge announcement" and not have their leaders of the club there.

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:56 pm
by kickinit
Could this had backfired anymore for the crows. Port now using this to their advantage.

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:01 pm
by Apachebulldog
I guess tomorrow they will all be saying Faark Faark Faark Faark what have we done we have alienated a lot of footy supporters in this state.

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:54 pm
by Blackwhite
The crows are a disgrace. The SA guesrnsey should be earnt, not used in a publicity stunt.

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:32 pm
by prowling panther
The decision has been over turned by the SANFL.

No free kick, just play on

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:48 pm
by Blackwhite
prowling panther wrote:The decision has been over turned by the SANFL.

No free kick, just play on



Thank god the SANFL has come to there senses. Finally common sense prevails.

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:29 am
by JK
Spoke to a former Magarey Medallist, State player, Fos William Medallist, and longtime AFL player tonight, and he was clearly offended by the guernsey! But hey, if the Schmoops at West Lakes think they're onto a winner, who's to stop them lol .. **** wits!! :lol:

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:36 am
by JK
From Adelaidenow - Crows chairman Rob Chapman told The Advertiser the Adelaide Football Club's intents with the state guernsey celebration were vastly misunderstood and misrepresented in public.

LMFAO .. Err Rob, where do you think the public perception emanated from? Arrogant club, with arrogant spokespeople and arrogant board members .. Reap what you sew you pieces of shit!!

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:44 am
by StrayDog
Mr Beefy wrote:
Q. wrote:It's probably been mentioned already (this whole thread is TLDR), but I find it wrong that blokes from other states will be wearing the SA guernsey.

What about women from other states? Personally, I think (some) women in footy jumpers can look hot.

Complications with the blood rule, apparently. 8-[

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:02 am
by StrayDog
Macca19 wrote:"SANFL club presidents are questioning why they were not consulted.

Norwood president Joe Tripodi told The Advertiser: "We should have been notified and consulted."


So, by "notify and consult", does he insist they should have "deferred to their member constituency" and made a decision with their interests and opinions at heart? What a great idea!

Perhaps Joe should sit down and discuss those concepts with his board, not to mention the hierarchy of a few other clubs around town. You just never know when a really important matter may arise.

Ain't that right Joe? ;)

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:50 am
by whufc
kickinit wrote:
Apachebulldog wrote:Get rid of Olsen there has been nothing but controversy since this Klown was appointed.

I also reckon sack Triggy as he did not have the balls to come out with this concept and he also set Smart up ??????


he probably did it to take the heat of himself. Also notice how their 2 captains where a no show. When does a club make a "huge announcement" and not have their leaders of the club there.


They didnt want non south Australians wearing the state guernsey at the launch, they would have known that would have added more heat on the debate

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:59 am
by gadj1976
DOC wrote:Get this:

SANFL club presidents are questioning why they were not consulted. Norwood president Joe Tripodi told The Advertiser: "We should have been notified and consulted."

Why? So you could disregard your members wishes and sell them out? Again?


He was notified, along with the rest of us. Being consulted and being notified are two polar opposite events.

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:35 am
by stan
Apachebulldog wrote:I guess tomorrow they will all be saying Faark Faark Faark Faark what have we done we have alienated a lot of footy supporters in this state.


The AFC really dont care what other footy supporters in the state think, however the SANFL does. Nothing like having your own legends giving you a belting in the media.

Re: Crows Disgrace

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:06 am
by Brodlach
Sanity prevails.