by Mickyj » Mon Mar 31, 2008 12:53 pm
by ferret » Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:10 pm
by Mickyj » Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:28 pm
ferret wrote:Last year the Eagles never played more than three talls up forward, maybe different personnel but never more than 3 talls. I know the hierarchy at the Eagles rate Salter one of the best CHFs in the SANFL. With his extra training at the power he will be the ideal CHF. The current mix of tall personnel up forward I feel is just right. Staple HF flank will run all day and wear his opponent out, CHF Salter to take a big mark, move around and KICK the LLLLLLLong goal and Schwarze to take the strong mark on the lead. Mickjaye you must remember that Salter is only 20 yo and of course his performance will fluctuate game to game but just remember what he did at CHF in the second half of 2007 and was most probably our best player in the prelim. final against NA.
by ferret » Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:44 pm
by Mickyj » Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:25 pm
ferret wrote:Granted Salter had the odd run on the ball in the prelim. but does this now defeat your argument he is too slow to play at CHF as you mentioned in one of your previous posting. I'm pretty sure he got most of his 4 goals at CHF. Good to see that we agree on the need to get more goals from other than talls.
Possibility Eagles could have both Paul Stewart and Rob Shirley back.
Would rather have smalls back than Kenny. Have plenty of quality talls such as; Schwarze, Salter, Staple, Twomey, Grocke, Passador, McEntee, McKenzie, and Hier for the tall set positions. Further down the track Hentschel has to be squeezed in.
by johntheclaret » Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:05 am
by drebin » Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:27 am
johntheclaret wrote:Coulter had the wood on Salter all day.
Thought McKenzie had a good game for you guys and took Alleway out of the game for the best part of 3 qtrs. Interesting to see that when McKenzie moved off Alleway, Allers kicked 3 goals (2 in the last qtr).
Now I'm no expert and a long way from the action, but there was a couple of strange decisions that could have changed the course of the game.
Firstly, Jars take Down, our only other ruck, out of the game and played him in the magoos, and put, arguably our best back, in Schubert as a second ruck. what happens, Schwartz kills the inexperienced Cunningham and the even more inexperienced Brown, and kicks 8 nearly winning it for WWT.
Then Fuller takes McKenzie off Alleway late in the 3rd qtr, even though he had keep Alleway goaless up until then, and then Allers kicks three goals which, with hindsight probably won it for North.
?
by Mickyj » Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:32 am
johntheclaret wrote:Coulter had the wood on Salter all day.
Thought McKenzie had a good game for you guys and took Alleway out of the game for the best part of 3 qtrs. Interesting to see that when McKenzie moved off Alleway, Allers kicked 3 goals (2 in the last qtr).
Now I'm no expert and a long way from the action, but there was a couple of strange decisions that could have changed the course of the game.
Firstly, Jars take Down, our only other ruck, out of the game and played him in the magoos, and put, arguably our best back, in Schubert as a second ruck. what happens, Schwartz kills the inexperienced Cunningham and the even more inexperienced Brown, and kicks 8 nearly winning it for WWT.
Then Fuller takes McKenzie off Alleway late in the 3rd qtr, even though he had keep Alleway goaless up until then, and then Allers kicks three goals which, with hindsight probably won it for North.
?
by johntheclaret » Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:33 am
by drebin » Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:26 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Didn't realise that White was ruled of pre-game which would explain Down dropping to the magoo's but it was obvious, even to me, that Cunningham and Brown wern't up to it against a player of Schwartz's ability and experience.
Still a win is a win
by johntheclaret » Thu Apr 03, 2008 3:47 am
drebin wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Didn't realise that White was ruled of pre-game which would explain Down dropping to the magoo's but it was obvious, even to me, that Cunningham and Brown wern't up to it against a player of Schwartz's ability and experience.
Still a win is a win
Surely not having Damon White to play CHB would have ensured a second ruckman in Down was selected to the 21 and use Schubert at CHB??? The final 21 that played in my opinion was short of defensive height and size and that was proven as the game went on.
by drebin » Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:39 am
drebin wrote:.johntheclaret wrote:drebin wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Didn't realise that White was ruled of pre-game which would explain Down dropping to the magoo's but it was obvious, even to me, that Cunningham and Brown wern't up to it against a player of Schwartz's ability and experience.
Still a win is a win
Surely not having Damon White to play CHB would have ensured a second ruckman in Down was selected to the 21 and use Schubert at CHB??? The final 21 that played in my opinion was short of defensive height and size and that was proven as the game went on.
Agree but would that not depend on when White actually dropped out. Was it 5 mins before the game or before the magoos had played. If the latter, then no excuse for Down not playing IMO
by johntheclaret » Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:46 am
by kingrooster » Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:53 am
by drebin » Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:25 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |