Page 12 of 14
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2016 12:55 pmby Rik E Boy
Booney wrote:Pseudo wrote:oldfella wrote:While i barrack for west adelaide i am a bigger supporter of the sanfl as a whole -- the glenelg football club is one of the foundation clubs of the sanfl and i find it distressing to say the least to think a foundation club could be lost
While I appreciate and share your sentiment regarding the loss of any club, Glenelg was not a foundation club.
Technically, but you could say many clubs have built their success upon the GFC, making them a sound foundation.
LMAO. Everyone bar the Roosters!
regards,
REB
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2016 2:49 pmby Wedgie
Rik E Boy wrote:Booney wrote:Pseudo wrote:oldfella wrote:While i barrack for west adelaide i am a bigger supporter of the sanfl as a whole -- the glenelg football club is one of the foundation clubs of the sanfl and i find it distressing to say the least to think a foundation club could be lost
While I appreciate and share your sentiment regarding the loss of any club, Glenelg was not a foundation club.
Technically, but you could say many clubs have built their success upon the GFC, making them a sound foundation.
LMAO. Everyone bar the Roosters!
regards,
REB
1987 was alright. Premiership, Margaret Medalist, Ken Farmer Medalist and largest GF winning margin between the two. Just a wee bit of success there.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:24 pmby Sheik Yerbouti
& the win was more than 85/6 combined.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:45 pmby Magellan
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:& the win was more than 85/6 combined.
I wish that were the case SY, but IIRC the margin in 1985 was 57 points, and 1986 was 48 points.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:50 pmby Spargo
Magellan wrote:Sheik Yerbouti wrote:& the win was more than 85/6 combined.
I wish that were the case SY, but IIRC the margin in 1985 was 57 points, and 1986 was 48 points.
Plus the 7 pts from '73
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:54 pmby Sheik Yerbouti
Spargo wrote:Magellan wrote:Sheik Yerbouti wrote:& the win was more than 85/6 combined.
I wish that were the case SY, but IIRC the margin in 1985 was 57 points, and 1986 was 48 points.
Plus the 7 pts from '73
haha yeah the 45 minute last quarter, bastards.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:03 pmby Magellan
If the Bays do fold, will North be awarded the 1973, 1985 and 1986 flags a la the 2012 Brownlow?
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:33 pmby Pseudo
Magellan wrote:If the Bays do fold, will North be awarded the 1973, 1985 and 1986 flags a la the 2012 Brownlow?
No. They will be raffled off to help pay the outstanding debts.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:59 pmby Rik E Boy
Wedgie wrote:1987 was alright. Premiership, Margaret Medalist, Ken Farmer Medalist and largest GF winning margin between the two. Just a wee bit of success there.
By Glenelg ownership standards that is very wee indeed.
regards,
REB
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:20 pmby HeartBeatsTrue
Wedgie wrote:1987 was alright. Premiership, Margaret Medalist, Ken Farmer Medalist and largest GF winning margin between the two. Just a wee bit of success there.
All these years following SANFL, I never knew there was a medal named in honor of Margaret.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:42 pmby Dogwatcher
Interesting news.
Seemingly, Frankston in the VFL has been saved:
http://bit.ly/2fnuGqEGlenelg will be very interested in this.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:11 pmby heater31
Dogwatcher wrote:Interesting news.
Seemingly, Frankston in the VFL has been saved:
http://bit.ly/2fnuGqEGlenelg will be very interested in this.
Do they get their spot back in the VFL?
Noticed a lot of their better players were crossing town and playing for Williamstown next year.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:17 pmby therisingblues
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Wedgie wrote:1987 was alright. Premiership, Margaret Medalist, Ken Farmer Medalist and largest GF winning margin between the two. Just a wee bit of success there.
All these years following SANFL, I never knew there was a medal named in honor of Margaret.
Presented to the maker of the best cup of tea in a SANFL season I believe.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:20 pmby therisingblues
Rik E Boy wrote:Wedgie wrote:1987 was alright. Premiership, Margaret Medalist, Ken Farmer Medalist and largest GF winning margin between the two. Just a wee bit of success there.
By Glenelg ownership standards that is very wee indeed.
regards,
REB
We have them 3 nil in grand finals.
How have other sides gone cashing in on the Bays in grand finals?
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:46 pmby Spargo
therisingblues wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Wedgie wrote:1987 was alright. Premiership, Margaret Medalist, Ken Farmer Medalist and largest GF winning margin between the two. Just a wee bit of success there.
By Glenelg ownership standards that is very wee indeed.
regards,
REB
We have them 3 nil in grand finals.
How have other sides gone cashing in on the Bays in grand finals?
'69 no, but '70 & '74 we simply blew*
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:55 pmby Rik E Boy
therisingblues wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Wedgie wrote:1987 was alright. Premiership, Margaret Medalist, Ken Farmer Medalist and largest GF winning margin between the two. Just a wee bit of success there.
By Glenelg ownership standards that is very wee indeed.
regards,
REB
We have them 3 nil in grand finals.
How have other sides gone cashing in on the Bays in grand finals?
We have them 3 nil in grand finals as well. 'What's Norwood done since the War?' Cornes used to say...'Won three grand finals against Glenelg' was always my answer.
regards,
REB
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Thu Nov 24, 2016 1:08 pmby therisingblues
That'd have to be the two best grand final records against the Bays.
Port have cashed in on the Bays also, but, Glenelg's first flag was against the Pies. Tat's a tarnished record.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:17 amby Dogwatcher
We're one for one against them.
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:31 amby Hazydog
So what was the outcome of the Council meeting?
Re: Save the Tigers
Posted:
Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:59 amby oldfella
From reading councils website members of public excluded and all records confidential for 2 years based on business confidentiality
Motion moved reaffirming that council is commited to supporting the glenelg football club