
by LBT » Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:58 am
by sturt1 » Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:17 am
LBT wrote:After such a wonderful season last year, coupled with brilliant recruiting, sturt will finish top two and star recruit Stephen Brooks will surely win the magarey.
by mal » Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:17 am
LBT wrote:After such a wonderful season last year, coupled with brilliant recruiting, sturt will finish top two and star recruit Stephen Brooks will surely win the magarey.
by sturt1 » Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:26 am
mal wrote:sturt1 wrote:bayman wrote:reserves
norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48
league
norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99
sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63
sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily
Having said that, Sturt will finish higher than glenelg this season.
Sturt will finish HIGHER than Glenelg
I thought smoking dope was illegal
by MST » Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:15 am
bayman wrote:reserves
norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48
league
norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99
sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63
sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily
by Jimmy » Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:41 pm
LBT wrote:After such a wonderful season last year, coupled with brilliant recruiting, sturt will finish top two and star recruit Stephen Brooks will surely win the magarey.
by bayman » Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:38 pm
sturt1 wrote:bayman wrote:reserves
norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48
league
norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99
sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63
sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily
Having said that, Sturt will finish higher than glenelg this season.
by MST » Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:50 pm
bayman wrote:sturt1 wrote:bayman wrote:reserves
norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48
league
norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99
sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63
sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily
Having said that, Sturt will finish higher than glenelg this season.
how much ? (will you pay ?) i'll tell you now sturt WILL RUN BOTTOM
by LBT » Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:09 pm
by sturtpeter » Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:31 pm
by MST » Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 pm
LBT wrote:On a serious note, is Paul Jarvis likely to play league this year? I can remember him playing really well for westies in the late 90's. I have a lot of respect for him due to his commitment to SANFL football. Lesser players have fled to the $$$ of country footy.
by sturt1 » Sat Mar 31, 2007 3:45 pm
bayman wrote:sturt1 wrote:bayman wrote:reserves
norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48
league
norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99
sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63
sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily
Having said that, Sturt will finish higher than glenelg this season.
how much ? (will you pay ?) i'll tell you now sturt WILL RUN BOTTOM
by JK » Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:27 pm
by MST » Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:53 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Im surprised there isn't more concern amongst the Sturt faithful after watching last nights display ... Whats the deal with DeLuca?? How is a bloke like that not the dominant figure he should be?? He has the size (and pace for it) and has plenty of ability IMHO, almost seems like something's not right there!!
SP - It's a trial game mate, I would have thought there were more things to be critical of than a BBQ stall not being open, and as for the Oval and lighting being a sham, perhaps we should have played at Unley last night??![]()
MST - Norwood had plenty of outs, Hill, Duigan, Aish, Nicholas, McDonnell, De Jong, Pfeiffer, Campbell, Meeson (last few AFL listed I know, but will play most of year with us), Gibbo (was showered by 1/2 time) ... A good run with injury and we will play much better than last night.
Sturt have some good players ... Can't remember names but number 50 looked lively and number 12 (the Riewoldt lookalike - from a distance anyway) looks to have good ability.
by bayman » Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:51 pm
sturt1 wrote:bayman wrote:sturt1 wrote:bayman wrote:reserves
norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48
league
norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99
sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63
sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily
Having said that, Sturt will finish higher than glenelg this season.
how much ? (will you pay ?) i'll tell you now sturt WILL RUN BOTTOM
I will pay you what ever you want if we finish below glenelg, however we wont so how much will you give me?
by Jimmy » Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:04 am
sturtpeter wrote:I'd say he would be a chance for Round 1 not only due to his exemplary character and his passion and loyalty to the Jumper but his 100% endeavour always.
by sturt1 » Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:44 am
bayman wrote:sturt1 wrote:bayman wrote:sturt1 wrote:bayman wrote:reserves
norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48
league
norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99
sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63
sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily
Having said that, Sturt will finish higher than glenelg this season.
how much ? (will you pay ?) i'll tell you now sturt WILL RUN BOTTOM
I will pay you what ever you want if we finish below glenelg, however we wont so how much will you give me?
YOU CAN HAVE UP TO $1,000.00 AT EVEN MONEY
by sturt1 » Sun Apr 01, 2007 9:33 am
Constance_Perm wrote:Im surprised there isn't more concern amongst the Sturt faithful after watching last nights display ... Whats the deal with DeLuca?? How is a bloke like that not the dominant figure he should be?? He has the size (and pace for it) and has plenty of ability IMHO, almost seems like something's not right there!!
SP - It's a trial game mate, I would have thought there were more things to be critical of than a BBQ stall not being open, and as for the Oval and lighting being a sham, perhaps we should have played at Unley last night??![]()
MST - Norwood had plenty of outs, Hill, Duigan, Aish, Nicholas, McDonnell, De Jong, Pfeiffer, Campbell, Meeson (last few AFL listed I know, but will play most of year with us), Gibbo (was showered by 1/2 time) ... A good run with injury and we will play much better than last night.
Sturt have some good players ... Can't remember names but number 50 looked lively and number 12 (the Riewoldt lookalike - from a distance anyway) looks to have good ability.
by carey » Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:05 am
by Jimmy » Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:34 am
carey wrote:whats happened to craig taylor and tom hurley ?
i'm not a sturt supporter at all but there 2 kids i think have a great future both guns i believe .
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |