SA Footy

southernbulldog wrote:Thilthorpe & Rowe playing SANFL we will be up against at least 17 AFL listed players now.Will take a big effort for us to get within 5 goals .

I think the stats show teams don't beat 17 listed afl players.

Dogs 5.2(32)
Crows 2.1(13)

1:4 time

Dogs64 wrote:

southernbulldog wrote:Thilthorpe & Rowe playing SANFL we will be up against at least 17 AFL listed players now.Will take a big effort for us to get within 5 goals .

I think the stats show teams don't beat 17 listed afl players.

We obviously can’t read stats then, not that it counts for anything in the big scheme of things

Dogs 7.4(46)
C&$@s 6.8(44)

Half time
Goals : Whitlum 3. Kendall 2

Dogs 9.9(63)
C&$@s 10.9(69)

3/4 time
Goals Dogs : Whitlum 3. Kendall Grace 2 McCormack Launer

am Bays wrote:

Dogs64 wrote:

southernbulldog wrote:Thilthorpe & Rowe playing SANFL we will be up against at least 17 AFL listed players now.Will take a big effort for us to get within 5 goals .

I think the stats show teams don't beat 17 listed afl players.

We obviously can’t read stats then, not that it counts for anything in the big scheme of things

I think he meant average teams don't win against 17 afl listed players.

who was the dogs fan who predicted 8-10 wins after round 1?

3-4 might be more realistic methinks

stampy wrote:who was the dogs fan who predicted 8-10 wins after round 1?

3-4 might be more realistic methinks

To lose by only 4 goals against that team is a fair effort I would say.
We will beat West again, Port twice, Norwood twice & the way South are travelling, them at Elizabeth.

Cannot question the boys effort today the boys tried their hearts out. Two of the three umpires today werent bad but the bald headed one is a blatant cheat.

Yeah -the nude nutted ump did appear to have a sub conscious bias to the Crows.. but in the end our endeavour could only take us so far. Happy with the progress, we are certainly on the right track. McCormack Pres and the Schillers all solid contributors again. Good signs from a couple of the lower profiled recruits in Launer and Gant, along with youngster Whitelum early on.

gazzamagoo wrote:

stampy wrote:who was the dogs fan who predicted 8-10 wins after round 1?

3-4 might be more realistic methinks

To lose by only 4 goals against that team is a fair effort I would say.
We will beat West again, Port twice, Norwood twice & the way South are travelling, them at Elizabeth.

No you won’t!
Westies will beat the Dogs at home. No problem!!!!

gazzamagoo wrote:

stampy wrote:who was the dogs fan who predicted 8-10 wins after round 1?

3-4 might be more realistic methinks

To lose by only 4 goals against that team is a fair effort I would say.
We will beat West again, Port twice, Norwood twice & the way South are travelling, them at Elizabeth.

mate you are going to be 1-7 looking at the draw, for you i hope i am wrong but you have to be realistic

stampy wrote:

gazzamagoo wrote:

stampy wrote:who was the dogs fan who predicted 8-10 wins after round 1?

3-4 might be more realistic methinks

To lose by only 4 goals against that team is a fair effort I would say.
We will beat West again, Port twice, Norwood twice & the way South are travelling, them at Elizabeth.

mate you are going to be 1-7 looking at the draw, for you i hope i am wrong but you have to be realistic

3 and 6 after round 10.

gazzamagoo wrote:

stampy wrote:

gazzamagoo wrote:

stampy wrote:who was the dogs fan who predicted 8-10 wins after round 1?

3-4 might be more realistic methinks

To lose by only 4 goals against that team is a fair effort I would say.
We will beat West again, Port twice, Norwood twice & the way South are travelling, them at Elizabeth.

mate you are going to be 1-7 looking at the draw, for you i hope i am wrong but you have to be realistic

3 and 6 after round 10.

so out of eags, strut, norwood and genelg, which game you gunna win, norwood at the parade?

Very close, just hampered by some ill timed errors or bad luck (and one particular umpire whose inconsistent interpretations seem to consistently favour the Crows)

Billy's a jet and Pres & Travis continue to perform. Grace looked more at home up fwd.
I believe Shaw, Olssen and Neagle have all stepped up as valuable contributors at this level and Kendall had his best game at the Club.
Not sold on Bailey Reeves at present, but he clearly has cred.
Dorizzi looks an exciting talent, and Gant is showing promise.

Stampy, We should beat Norwood at Norwood, playing at Norwood doesn't bother us.

The only one of those four matches I would write ourselves off in is against Glenelg. The Eagles 2022 version is yet to convince me, Norwood is a 45/55 game for us (with a bit of luck, we can make it 51/49) and Sturt are still a very young team, likely to have some inconsistencies. We may not win any of them, but we certainly have chances in them.
Cheers

We wont get near Glenelg but not many teams will they are miles ahead of the rest of the competition.All the other teams i would hope we would be competitive in and hopefully win a few .

Bit tuff on the "melee" outcome. Central players lose their match payments, Adelaide players go without a cup of coffee.

southernbulldog wrote:We wont get near Glenelg but not many teams will they are miles ahead of the rest of the competition.All the other teams i would hope we would be competitive in and hopefully win a few .

Glenelg only just beat the Eagles, so does that mean we won't get close to the Eagles on Saturday.
Unfortunately I think Stampy is on the money,we'll be 1 and 7.