North v Port Sat 1440

All discussions to do with the SANFL
User avatar
scott
Veteran
Posts: 3760
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:23 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Location: Noarlunga Oval
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by scott »

DOC wrote:Crowd 1249. Is this the smallest at Prospect.

* Same post as the other game. AFL reserves and weather.

Lowest since 1,134 attended Round 16 2015 North v Glenelg. I recall that day being particularly awful weather-wise as well as Woodville recorded only 1,071 for the Eagles v South clash which is the lowest known crowd for that venue.
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
Posts: 36133
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:02 pm
Team: North Haven
Location: Gotham City
Has thanked: 12448 times
Been thanked: 1744 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by The Dark Knight »

What's the highest recorded disposal count in a SANFL league match? Has any player had more than 57? Is there anywhere where we can find SANFL records like most disposals?

I'm assuming spell_check has an answer?
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:20 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by therisingblues »

He will know, alright.
The trouble is, reaching him. He's not always on this site, recently. We need some sort of direct line, like a Bat Phone, or a giant spot- light that can cast his symbol on to the clouds, and when he sees it, he'll know there's some sort of question related to statistics on SAFooty, and then he could come on here and answer it for us.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
robranisgod
League - Best 21
Posts: 2081
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:06 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Flinders University
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 281 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by robranisgod »

The Dark Knight wrote:What's the highest recorded disposal count in a SANFL league match? Has any player had more than 57? Is there anywhere where we can find SANFL records like most disposals?

I'm assuming spell_check has an answer?


Darel Hart had exactly 57 possesions in a Prospect game in late 1990 when North thrashed West. He also kicked 6 goals in the match. For his efforts he got one Magarey Medal vote.

Kevin Morris said on TV on the Sunday following the match that any player who gets 30 touches in a half shouldn't be allowed back in the second half!

The Saturday after the Magarey Medal count Doug Thomas admitted that at the count he went up to the umpires who gave one vote to Hart (I think one was Mark Mackie) and told them they had absolutely no idea if they only gave one vote to Hart.

Around the same time, Chris McDermott had similar stats for Glenelg against Woodville and didn't get a vote at all.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16423
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:48 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by amber_fluid »

57 possessions and 6 goals.
Not a bad day out.
He was a great player.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
Posts: 36133
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:02 pm
Team: North Haven
Location: Gotham City
Has thanked: 12448 times
Been thanked: 1744 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by The Dark Knight »

robranisgod wrote:
The Dark Knight wrote:What's the highest recorded disposal count in a SANFL league match? Has any player had more than 57? Is there anywhere where we can find SANFL records like most disposals?

I'm assuming spell_check has an answer?


Darel Hart had exactly 57 possesions in a Prospect game in late 1990 when North thrashed West. He also kicked 6 goals in the match. For his efforts he got one Magarey Medal vote.

Kevin Morris said on TV on the Sunday following the match that any player who gets 30 touches in a half shouldn't be allowed back in the second half!

The Saturday after the Magarey Medal count Doug Thomas admitted that at the count he went up to the umpires who gave one vote to Hart (I think one was Mark Mackie) and told them they had absolutely no idea if they only gave one vote to Hart.

Around the same time, Chris McDermott had similar stats for Glenelg against Woodville and didn't get a vote at all.
Thanks for the trivia ROG. What an amazing individual performance having 57 and kicking 6 but bloody hell only the one vote, what a stitch up!!
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:07 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by LMA »

amber_fluid wrote:
locky801 wrote:
beef wrote:What's the record for most possessions? Rockliff with 40 at 3/4 time.


Dunno but he has 56 now :shock: :shock:

Westoff 37 and Powell-Pepper 32


Ridiculous numbers.
It’s why it’s a farce they are playing.

Might as well play the Power theme song.


Where else are they supposed to play, he might of still got 57 playing for Sturt under the old system and nobody would give a shit
Last edited by LMA on Sun Jun 30, 2019 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:07 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by LMA »

PanthersFan wrote:57 touches for Rockliff, 37 and 3 goals for Westhoff.... absolutely ridiculous. It’s a farce they still call this team the “magpies”.


Would it make it more bearable would it. Magpies, Power, whoever, its still PAFC
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by Jim05 »

LMA wrote:
PanthersFan wrote:57 touches for Rockliff, 37 and 3 goals for Westhoff.... absolutely ridiculous. It’s a farce they still call this team the “magpies”.


Would it make it more bearable would it. Magpies, Power, whoever, its still PAFC

Call themselves what the want, the sooner they are gone the better
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by Jim05 »

LMA wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:
locky801 wrote:
beef wrote:What's the record for most possessions? Rockliff with 40 at 3/4 time.


Dunno but he has 56 now :shock: :shock:

Westoff 37 and Powell-Pepper 32


Ridiculous numbers.
It’s why it’s a farce they are playing.

Might as well play the Power theme song.


Where else are they supposed to play, he might of still got 57 playing for Sturt under the old system and nobody would give a shit

Crows would be praying he gets a recall this week [emoji3]
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:07 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by LMA »

Jim05 wrote:
LMA wrote:
PanthersFan wrote:57 touches for Rockliff, 37 and 3 goals for Westhoff.... absolutely ridiculous. It’s a farce they still call this team the “magpies”.


Would it make it more bearable would it. Magpies, Power, whoever, its still PAFC

Call themselves what the want, the sooner they are gone the better


Tried that 28 years ago but everyone wanted us to stay
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by Jim05 »

LMA wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
LMA wrote:
PanthersFan wrote:57 touches for Rockliff, 37 and 3 goals for Westhoff.... absolutely ridiculous. It’s a farce they still call this team the “magpies”.


Would it make it more bearable would it. Magpies, Power, whoever, its still PAFC

Call themselves what the want, the sooner they are gone the better


Tried that 28 years ago but everyone wanted us to stay

At the time they didn’t envision you becoming a AFL reserves side
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:07 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by LMA »

Thank the SANFL for that, still no premietships though but the so called unfairness is always raised when the argument suits
Brett
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1120
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:07 pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by Brett »

LMA wrote:Thank the SANFL for that, still no premietships though but the so called unfairness is always raised when the argument suits


Always wanting to blame someone , its a culture at Port. Crowds for AFL are down so I assume wheels are in motion to get a new venue. So soon too. On your own now. :lol: I cant see Port surviving in the long term so maybe its time to really explore Tassie, NT or is China open ? Good to look forward .
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:07 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by LMA »

Strange post 8-}
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:20 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by therisingblues »

LMA wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:
locky801 wrote:
beef wrote:What's the record for most possessions? Rockliff with 40 at 3/4 time.


Dunno but he has 56 now :shock: :shock:

Westoff 37 and Powell-Pepper 32


Ridiculous numbers.
It’s why it’s a farce they are playing.

Might as well play the Power theme song.


Where else are they supposed to play, he might of still got 57 playing for Sturt under the old system and nobody would give a shit

Now, now, LMA, no one else wants your cretinous reserves side, least of all the real Magpies fans.
#noteverythingrevolvesaroundthepower
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:07 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by LMA »

onlyplebsusehashtags

Real fans embraced the move into the big leagues, the minority that couldn't see past black and white are probably Collingwood supporters (99% of the ones I know anyway). You would of had the same situation if Sturt won the 2nd licence as I dont think Carlton would of signed off on another Blues being in the comp.
User avatar
goddy11
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1368
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:05 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Myponga-Sellicks
Has thanked: 678 times
Been thanked: 221 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by goddy11 »

LMA wrote:onlyplebsusehashtags

Real fans embraced the move into the big leagues, the minority that couldn't see past black and white are probably Collingwood supporters (99% of the ones I know anyway). You would of had the same situation if Sturt won the 2nd licence as I dont think Carlton would of signed off on another Blues being in the comp.

Your not very familiar with the SANFL are you. Sturt are actually Double Blues and not at all similar to Carlton in ant way. Maybe SA. :D
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:07 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by LMA »

goddy11 wrote:
LMA wrote:onlyplebsusehashtags

Real fans embraced the move into the big leagues, the minority that couldn't see past black and white are probably Collingwood supporters (99% of the ones I know anyway). You would of had the same situation if Sturt won the 2nd licence as I dont think Carlton would of signed off on another Blues being in the comp.

Your not very familiar with the SANFL are you. Sturt are actually Double Blues and not at all similar to Carlton in ant way. Maybe SA. :D


No shit. Very similar logo design and nickname that never would of got through, surely thats not hard to see
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: North v Port Sat 1440

Post by Booney »

LMA wrote:Strange post 8-}


Many of his are.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 289 guests