by Aerie » Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:50 am
by topsywaldron » Sat Apr 18, 2009 2:02 pm
drebin wrote:Umpiring a disgrace??? One of the better performances for awhile by the men in white. They let the play go and were consistent both ways with interpretations on the night.
by JK » Sat Apr 18, 2009 2:09 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:07 pm
topsywaldron wrote:North were the better side and fully deserved to win however the umpires were shocking IMHo so I guess we're going to have to disagree on them and Ackland who I thought looked really, really ordinary. About the only thing Norwood would have won last night was the centre clearances where Doyle dominated.
by Sploosh » Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:50 pm
Big Phil wrote:I ventured down to The Parade last night where a disappointing home side were outclassed by the well coached North Adelaide side...
by drebin » Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:10 pm
topsywaldron wrote: About the only thing Norwood would have won last night was the centre clearances where Doyle dominated.
by Squawk » Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:18 am
drebin wrote:Still after your salary cap cheating Norwood
by drebin » Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:27 am
Squawk wrote:drebin wrote:Still after your salary cap cheating Norwood
If it was cheating - which suggests it was a deliberate act - then why did the club volunteer that it had gone over the cap and as a result, cost itself $50k in fines and recruiting sanctions?
I'm looking forward to seeing the penalties dished out for clubs who are CAUGHT, as opposed to those who fess up an error. Confess and plead guilty at an early stage, get a better hearing. Get caught, maintain your silence, plead not guilty and then get found guilty, lookout.
by topsywaldron » Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:36 am
drebin wrote:The bleating about Rodan was "karma" to a degree (as pointed out previously) when your selfish **** of a coach and your Football Manager refused to allow two of our players to play 2 years ago due to an unintentional mistake on the team sheet when Norwood could have allowed them to play. We still won that with 2 players down!!! Clearly "in the spirit of the game" doesn't exist at the Parade.
by drebin » Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:46 am
topsywaldron wrote:drebin wrote:The bleating about Rodan was "karma" to a degree (as pointed out previously) when your selfish **** of a coach and your Football Manager refused to allow two of our players to play 2 years ago due to an unintentional mistake on the team sheet when Norwood could have allowed them to play. We still won that with 2 players down!!! Clearly "in the spirit of the game" doesn't exist at the Parade.
Obviously the bit where I twice congratulated North on being the better team was lost on some of the slower posters here.
As for our selfish **** of a coach? He's a North man through and through, as you can tell by his woeful record at Norwood, and you can have him back tomorrow.
by Squawk » Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:51 am
drebin wrote:You only admitted it because you got caught!!!![]()
Norwoods that rich and honest it will cough up $50k plus sanctions without any prompting??? Oh yeah - very believable!!!
by drebin » Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:54 am
Squawk wrote:drebin wrote:You only admitted it because you got caught!!!![]()
Norwoods that rich and honest it will cough up $50k plus sanctions without any prompting??? Oh yeah - very believable!!!
Why would the SANFL publicly say that Norwood volunteered it's error and presumably give it a discounted penalty as a result of their confession? In the alternative, if they 'caught' Norwood, then why not just say so?
by JK » Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:31 am
by drebin » Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:40 am
Constance_Perm wrote:Geez you North blokes find your voice again after a year in the wilderness
by am Bays » Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:08 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:16 am
drebin wrote:Squawk wrote:drebin wrote:You only admitted it because you got caught!!!![]()
Norwoods that rich and honest it will cough up $50k plus sanctions without any prompting??? Oh yeah - very believable!!!
Why would the SANFL publicly say that Norwood volunteered it's error and presumably give it a discounted penalty as a result of their confession? In the alternative, if they 'caught' Norwood, then why not just say so?
Face saving maybe? Anyhow it's done and dusted now - I'd be worried about this year too judging by your poor accounting and your recruiting!!!
by ca » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:44 am
by JK » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:45 am
by Punk Rooster » Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:25 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Just about every second Norwood player had some sort of bandage on them, or those ridiculous "achieve nothing" bike pants.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by NFC » Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:29 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Actually I must admit I was impressed with the size of the crowd Friday night, and particularly the amount of North fans there
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |