by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:22 pm
by Mickyj » Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:37 pm
spell_check wrote:Mickyj wrote:spell_check wrote:Reserves:
Eagles 17.8 (110)
Glenelg 8.12 (60)
(or close to that score)
League:
Eagles 3.2 9.9 11.9 15.16 (106)
Glenelg 2.9 4.12 7.16 10.16 (76)
A question for Spelly (may not be answerable ) Eagle seconds won by 10 goals or close to it .But were scoreless in the third term any clue if that has happened often.
Cheers
mickyj
At Reserves level:
Round 8 1920
Torrens 3.6 3.6 8.12 11.15 (81)
Sturt 0.2 2.6 2.6 2.9 (21)
Hindmarsh
Round 13 1964
South 5.8 6.8 14.17 14.17 (101)
West 0.3 1.6 1.6 3.9 (27)
Round 12 1971
South 4.4 13.7 13.7 18.11 (119)
Woodville 3.2 3.4 3.8 3.11 (29)
by Mickyj » Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:39 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:the umpiring was an absolute disgrace today for everyone, but i did think the Eagles got the worst of it
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:18 pm
Mickyj wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:the umpiring was an absolute disgrace today for everyone, but i did think the Eagles got the worst of it
I may not agree with you on anything the rest of the year MT79 but i do with that .But just to say after 3/4 we got a better run than u did the blonde umps seemed to be more sight impaired.
Hell I'm not sure who was booing them more when I was leaving the jarman stand.
by Columbo » Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:37 pm
Mickyj wrote:spell_check wrote:Reserves:
Eagles 17.8 (110)
Glenelg 8.12 (60)
(or close to that score)
League:
Eagles 3.2 9.9 11.9 15.16 (106)
Glenelg 2.9 4.12 7.16 10.16 (76)
A question for Spelly (may not be answerable ) Eagle seconds won by 10 goals or close to it .But were scoreless in the third term any clue if that has happened often.
Cheers
mickyj
by spell_check » Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:39 pm
Columbo wrote: Nice to be smiling on a Saturday night again hey lads!
by am Bays » Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:42 pm
by Columbo » Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:49 pm
am Bays wrote:I dunno, if I had a cat right now I'd be kicking 10 shades of sh!t out of it....
by Mickyj » Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:55 pm
Columbo wrote:Mickyj wrote:spell_check wrote:Reserves:
Eagles 17.8 (110)
Glenelg 8.12 (60)
(or close to that score)
League:
Eagles 3.2 9.9 11.9 15.16 (106)
Glenelg 2.9 4.12 7.16 10.16 (76)
A question for Spelly (may not be answerable ) Eagle seconds won by 10 goals or close to it .But were scoreless in the third term any clue if that has happened often.
Cheers
mickyj
Dont have my budget handy ATM but think the twos scored 2 points in the third qtr Micky, then started the last qtr with 6 straight goals in 12 minutes, amazing 40 odd minutes of footy. None the less i bow to Spelly and his speedy info gathering abilities! Nice to be smiling on a Saturday night again hey lads!
by Mickyj » Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:56 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Mickyj wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:the umpiring was an absolute disgrace today for everyone, but i did think the Eagles got the worst of it
I may not agree with you on anything the rest of the year MT79 but i do with that .But just to say after 3/4 we got a better run than u did the blonde umps seemed to be more sight impaired.
Hell I'm not sure who was booing them more when I was leaving the jarman stand.
And glenelg still lost![]()
![]()
by Columbo » Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:03 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:the umpiring was an absolute disgrace today for everyone, but i did think the Eagles got the worst of it
by woodwt » Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:06 pm
by stampy » Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:15 pm
by bayman » Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:23 pm
Columbo wrote:
Does it annoy everyone else as much as it annoys me to see the umpires using their arm to shield the sun from their eyes late in the game because they are looking straight into it? Logic says they should just face the other way but it just doesnt seem to happen, makes me wonder then how often they are guessing? Are they directed by their observers / coaches to face the grandstand all the time (and yeah i know it makes it easier for supporters to work out who to scream at!!) and if so why?
by Columbo » Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:30 pm
bayman wrote:wedgie & i for that matter don't understand why umpires are directed to 'stay in the corridor' to watch/umpire the game, ffs if it's like it was today come out to the wings so it can be umpired without umpires having to shield their eyes & lets face it even in cricket the square leg umpire can swap to point if the sun is in their eyes (for the record the umpires were not the reason glenelg lost, we were beaten by a better team on the day)
by Mickyj » Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:41 pm
Columbo wrote:bayman wrote:wedgie & i for that matter don't understand why umpires are directed to 'stay in the corridor' to watch/umpire the game, ffs if it's like it was today come out to the wings so it can be umpired without umpires having to shield their eyes & lets face it even in cricket the square leg umpire can swap to point if the sun is in their eyes (for the record the umpires were not the reason glenelg lost, we were beaten by a better team on the day)
Glad im not alone! Umpiring from the corridor, thats another thing again...that prompts more "guesses" IMHO especially if the play is 30m away and players are crowding around, the only consistency that is created from that will be inconsistecy and thats what the punters hate.
by MightyEagles » Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:54 pm
by MightyEagles » Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:56 pm
spell_check wrote:Just another thing today, one of the Eagles cheersquad members was given a decent whack on the cheek - massive egg was left on his face. The police were there taking statements, so I reckon the culprit did a runner. Lets hope that that sort of thing does not go unpunished.
by centrecirclelegend » Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:50 pm
by matt1 » Sun Apr 12, 2009 1:52 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |