redandblack wrote:So, bayman, if a team has only a dozen scoring shots when you're at a game, then has 25 and 30 scoring shots in their next two games, you don't believe they've either changed their game plan or are effecting it better, because you didn't see it.
Whatever way I read your posts, you're judging West on a trial and then telling dash61 not to judge teams on trials.
look, see me in a month & we'll see where they are...i'll grant you they've had more scoring shots & i hope they do try & score then they have a chance to win but i wonder what would be the first move made if west are 3 or 4 down in a match, i wasn't judging west on a trial per sae but on the team structure & & pattern....perhaps ac read what we thought after trial 1 & decided to attack instead
now r&b (& my friend dash61) please answer this question honestly would you put your money on west adelaide to beat most sides this year ? (on todays form)
i don't look at the scoreboard in trials because we know it means nothing i look at the team structure & the gameplan that teams are trying to employ, west's gameplan hadn't altered from 2008 up to that stage