redandblack wrote:For Central to be talking about saving th SANFl is arrogance of the highest order.
It's a pity they don't take the same moralistic high ground when it comes to some other matters.
Salary Cap?
by Squawk » Sun Aug 10, 2008 11:21 pm
redandblack wrote:For Central to be talking about saving th SANFl is arrogance of the highest order.
It's a pity they don't take the same moralistic high ground when it comes to some other matters.
by drebin » Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:39 am
smac wrote:For clarification.
Campbell is not the spokesperson of the CDFC, he has posted his opinion (on another forum), unsure why that was singled out and reposted here by someone else.
by smac » Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:07 am
by HeartBeatsTrue » Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:24 am
smac wrote:It wasn't a crack at you mate, get over yourself. I stated that I was unsure why it was re-posted here. Still am.
Your logic is quite odd. Tell me which other clubs forum webmaster is a nominated spokesperson of the club.
by Adelaide Hawk » Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:53 am
drebin wrote:smac wrote:For clarification.
Campbell is not the spokesperson of the CDFC, he has posted his opinion (on another forum), unsure why that was singled out and reposted here by someone else.
He is listed on your club website officials page as running the website and the comments were made on the clubs official website forum which is publically accessible??? Whilst he is entitled to his opinion, calling another club CEO a peanut is not acceptable IMO in terms of the debate he was "wading" into.
Still smac - no suprise you found another back door way to have a crack at me (again!).
by Dogwatcher » Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:21 am
by whatever » Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:33 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:35 pm
whatever wrote:As much as I am very opposed to the proposed changes I think it is poor form not to attend the Presidents lunch (it would be even worse if they were told to stay away)
I have never been to these lunches but if the opposition president gets a minute to speek it would give him a chance to address influential people from another club in an open and creative way of explaining why they want to keep the current format.
by rod_rooster » Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:40 pm
smac wrote:It wasn't a crack at you mate, get over yourself. I stated that I was unsure why it was re-posted here. Still am.
Your logic is quite odd. Tell me which other clubs forum webmaster is a nominated spokesperson of the club.
by CENTURION » Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:43 pm
by MagicKiwi » Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:02 pm
by TigerBoss » Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:41 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:56 pm
TigerBoss wrote: I reakon every club has peanuts.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |